Closed-loop double-vasopressor automated system vs manual bolus vasopressor to treat hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial

Anaesthesia

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 37-45

  Sng, B L ^a   Tan, H S ^b   Sia, A T H ^a  

^a KK WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^b DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; EPHEDRINE; FENTANYL; LACTIC ACID; MORPHINE; PHENYLEPHRINE;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PH; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; BOLUS INJECTION; BRADYCARDIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CLOSED LOOP DOUBLE VASOPRESSOR AUTOMATED SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LACTATE BLOOD LEVEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NAUSEA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SYRINGE; SYRINGE PUMP; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; CESAREAN SECTION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EPHEDRINE; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PHENYLEPHRINE; PREGNANCY; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890089126     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12460     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ngan Kee WD,. Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 2010; 23: 304-9.
2. Lewinsky RM, Riskin-Mashiah S,. Autonomic imbalance in preeclampsia: evidence for increased sympathetic tone in response to the supine-pressor test. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 91: 935-9.
3. Li P, Tong C, Eisenach JC,. Pregnancy and ephedrine increase the release of nitric oxide in ovine uterine arteries. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; 82: 288-93.
4. Leduc L, Wasserstrum N, Spillman T, Cotton DB,. Baroreflex function in normal pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 165: 886-90.
5. Greiss FC Jr,. Pressure-flow relationship in the gravid uterine vascular bed. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1966; 96: 41-7.
6. Cyna AM, Andrew M, Emmett RS, Middleton P, Simmons SW,. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006; 4: CD002251.
7. Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T,. A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002; 94: 920-6.
8. Cooper DW, Carpenter M, Mowbray P, Desira WR, Ryall DM, Kokri MS,. Fetal and maternal effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 1582-90.
9. Sia ATH, Tan HS, Sng BL,. Closed-loop double-vasopressor automated system to treat hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a preliminary study. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 1348-55.
10. Hanss R, Ilies C, Missalla H, Steinfath M, Bein B,. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. ASA Annual Meeting, 2009; A827. http://www.asaabstracts.com/strands/ asaabstracts/abstract.htm;jsessionid=5F43A6D4D70C215A3B8A64D2FC427F46?year= 2009&index=14&absnum=445 (accessed 19/10/2013).
11. Ilies C, Bauer M, Berg P, et al. Investigation of the agreement of a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure device in comparison with invasive radial artery measurement. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2012; 108: 202-10.
12. Jeleazcov C, Krajinovic L, Munster T, et al. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAP™) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: assessment during general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2010; 105: 264-72.
13. Archibald CP, Lee HP,. Sample size estimation for clinicians. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 1995; 24: 328-32.
14. Ngan Kee WD, Tam YH, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Critchley LA, Karmakar MK,. Closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a preliminary descriptive study. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 1251-6.
15. Varvel JR, Donoho DL, Shafer SL,. Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1992; 20: 63-94.
16. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF,. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 744-50.
17. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Tam YH,. Randomized comparison of closed-loop feedback computer-controlled with manual-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013; 110: 59-65.
18. Doherty A, Ohashi Y, Downey K, Carvalho JCA,. Phenylephrine infusion versus bolus regimens during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a double-blind randomized clinical trial to assess hemodynamic changes. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2012; 115: 1343-50.
19. Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Lee BB,. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2004; 98: 815-21.
20. Allen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS,. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2010; 111: 1221-9.
21. Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M,. The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2010; 111: 1230-7.