Environmental bio-monitoring with high-throughput sequencing

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 575-588

  Wang, Jing ^a   McLenachan, Patricia A ^b   Biggs, Patrick J ^c   Winder, Linton H ^c   Schoenfeld, Barbara I K ^c   Narayan, Vinay V ^c   Phiri, Bernard J ^c   Lockhart, Peter J ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c Institute of Fundamental Sciences Massey University ^*

Author keywords

Environmental bio monitoring; High throughput sequencing; Metagenomics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ECOSYSTEM; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL BIO-MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENETIC DATABASE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METAGENOMICS; STATISTICS;

ENVIRONMENTAL BIO-MONITORING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; METAGENOMICS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; METAGENOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84890081997     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbt032     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Thomas T, Gilbert J, Meyer F. Metagenomics-a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microb Inf Exp 12012;2:3.
2. Gonzalez A, Jose C, Shade A., et al. Our microbial selves: What ecology can teach us. EMBO Rep 2011;12: 775-84.
3. Garcia GD, Gregoracci GB, de O, Santos E, et al. Metagenomic analysis of healthy and white plague-affected mussismilia braziliensis corals. Microb Ecol 2013;65:1076-86.
4. Carter MQ, Xue K, Brandl MT, et al. Functional metagenomics of Escherichia coli O157:H7 interactions with spinach indigenous microorganisms during biofilm formation. PloS One 2012;7: e44186.
5. Knight R, Jansson J, Field D, et al. Unlocking the potential of metagenomics through replicated experimental design. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:513-20.
6. Kennedy J, Flemer B, Jackson SA, et al. Marine metagenomics: new tools for the study and exploitation of marine microbial metabolism. Mar Drugs 2010;8: 608-28.
7. Calvignac-Spencer S, Merkel K, Kutzner N, et al. Carrion fly-derived DNA as a tool for comprehensive and costeffective assessment of mammalian biodiversity. Mol Eol 2013;22:915-24.
8. Woyke T, Teeling H, Ivanova NN, et al. Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium. Nature 2006;443:950-5.
9. Sloan DB, Moran N. Endosymbiotic bacteria as a source of carotenoids in whiteflies. Biol Lett 2012;8:986-9.
10. Vorsino AE, Wieczorek AM, Wright MG, et al. Using evolutionary tools to facilitate the prediction and prevention of host-based differentiation in biological control: a review and perspective. Ann Appl Biol 2012;160:204-16.
11. Jurado-Rivera JA, Vogler AP, Reid CAM, et al. DNA barcoding insect-host plant associations. Proc. Biol Sci R Soc 2009;276:639-48.
12. Holland JM, Smith BM, Birkett TC, et al. Farmland bird invertebrate food provision in arable crops. Ann Appl Biol 2012;160:66-75.
13. Lundgren JG, Ellsbury ME, Prischmann DA. Analysis of the predator community of a subterranean herbivorous insect based on polymerase chain reaction. Ecol Appl 2009;19: 2157-66.
14. Ellwood MDF, Foster WA. Doubling the estimate of invertebrate biomass in a rainforest canopy. Nature 2004;429: 549-51.
15. Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 2011;470:479-85.
16. Marx CJ. Can you sequence ecology? Metagenomics of adaptive diversification. PLoS Biol 2013;11:e1001487.
17. Manly BFJ. The Design and Analysis of Research Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992;353.
18. Southwood T, Henderson PA. Ecological Methods. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000;75.
19. Prosser JI. Replicate or lie. Environ Microb 2010;12:1806-10.
20. Tringe SG, Rubin EM. Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:805-14.
21. Delmont TO, Robe P, Cecillon S, et al. Accessing the soil metagenome for studies of microbial diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:1315-24.
22. Lombard N, Prestat E, Van Elsas JD, et al. Soil-specific limitations for access and analysis of soil microbial communities by metagenomics. FEMSMicrobiol Ecol 2011;78:31-49.
23. Zarraonaindia I, Smith DP, Gilbert JA. Beyond the genome: community-level analysis of the microbial world. Biol Philos 2013;28: 261-82.
24. Zambrano L, Contreras V, Mazari-Hiriart M., et al. Spatial heterogeneity of water quality in a highly degraded tropical freshwater ecosystem. Environ Manage 2009;43: 249-63.
25. Ugland KI, Gray JS, Ellingsen KE. The species-accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. J Anim 2003;888-97.
26. Thompson GG, Thompson SA, Withers PC, et al. Determining adequate trapping effort and species richness using species accumulation curves for environmental impact assessments. Austral Ecol 2007;32:570-80.
27. Unterseher M, Jumpponen A, Opik M, et al. Species abundance distributions and richness estimations in fungal metagenomics- lessons learned from community ecology. Mol Ecol 2011;20:275-85.
28. Wooley JC, Godzik A, Friedberg I. A primer on metagenomics. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000667.
29. Dole-Olivier MJ, Castellarini F, Coineau N, et al. Towards an optimal sampling strategy to assess groundwater biodiversity: comparison across six European regions. Freshwater Biol 2009;54:777-96.
30. Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, Ricketts TH, et al. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:4399-06.
31. Zinger L, Gobet A, Pommier T. Two decades of describing the unseen majority of aquatic microbial diversity. Mol Ecol 2012;21:1878-96.
32. Whittaker RH. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 1960;30:279-338.
33. Wang JF, Jiang CS, Hu MG, et al. Design-based spatial sampling: theory and implementation. Environ Model Softw 2013;40:280-8.
34. Wang JF, Stein A, Gao BB, et al. A review of spatial sampling. Spat Stat 2012;2:1-14.
35. Zhang J, Zhang C. Sampling and sampling strategies for environmental analysis. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2012;92: 466-78.
36. Smith KL, Jones ML. Allocation of sampling effort to optimize efficiency of watershed-level ichthyofaunal inventories. Trans Am Fish Soc 2008;137:1500-6.
37. Mizrahi-Man O, Davenport ER, Gilad Y. Taxonomic classification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes using short sequencing reads: evaluation of effective study designs. PloS One 2013;8:e53608.
38. Dickie IA. Insidious effects of sequencing errors on perceived diversity in molecular surveys. New Phytol 2010; 188:916-8.
39. Krsek M, Wellington EM. Comparison of different methods for the isolation and purification of total community DNA from soil. JMicrobiol Methods 1999;39:1-16.
40. Stach JEM, Bathe S, Clapp JP, et al. PCR-SSCP comparison of 16S rDNA sequence diversity in soil DNA obtained using different isolation and purification methods. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2001;36:139-51.
41. LaMontagne MG, Michel FC, Holden PA, et al. Evaluation of extraction and purification methods for obtaining PCRamplifiable DNA from compost for microbial community analysis. JMicrobiol Methods 2002;49:255-64.
42. Carrigg C, Rice O, Kavanagh S, et al. DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007;77:955-64.
43. Hong S, Bunge J, Leslin C, et al. Polymerase chain reaction primers miss half of rRNA microbial diversity. ISME J 2009;3:1365-73.
44. Feinstein LM, Sul WJ, Blackwood CB. Assessment of bias associated with incomplete extraction of microbial DNA from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:5428-33.
45. Temperton B., Field D, Oliver A, et al. Bias in assessments of marine microbial biodiversity in fosmid libraries as evaluated by pyrosequencing. ISMEJ 2009;3:792-6.
46. Zhao F, Xu K. Efficiency of DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of soil microeukaryotic diversity. Acta Ecol Sinica 2012;32:209-14.
47. Morgan JL, Darling AE, Eisen JA. Metagenomic sequencing of an in vitro-simulated microbial community. PLoS One 2010;5:1-10.
48. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNAbased studies. PLoS One 2011;6:e27310.
49. Diaz PI, Dupuy AK, Abusleme L, et al. Using high throughput sequencing to explore the biodiversity in oral bacterial communities. Mol Oral Microbiol 2012;27:182-201.
50. Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, Wrighton KC, et al. Experimental factors affecting PCR-based estimates of microbial species richness and evenness. ISMEJ 2010;4:642-7.
51. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, et al. Ultra-highthroughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSEQ and MiSEQ platforms. ISMEJ 2012;6:1621-4.
52. Whiteley AS, Jenkins S, Waite I, et al. Microbial 16S rRNA Ion Tag and community metagenome sequencing using the Ion Torrent (PGM) Platform. J Microbiol Methods 2012;91: 80-8.
53. Lemos LN, Fulthorpe RR, Triplett EW, et al. Rethinking microbial diversity analysis in the high throughput sequencing era. JMicrobiol Mhethods 2011;86:42-51.
54. Shah N, Tang H, Doak TG, et al. Comparing bacterial communities inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics. Pac Symp Biocomput 2011;16:165-76.
55. Glass EM, Wilkening J, Wilke A, et al. Using the metagenomics RAST server (MG-RAST) for analyzing shotgun metagenomes. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010. pdb.prot5368.
56. Bowen De León K, Ramsay BD, Fields MW. Quality-score refinement of SSU rRNA gene pyrosequencing differs across gene region for environmental samples. Microb Ecol 2012;64:499-508.
57. Haas BJ, Gevers DE, Ashlee M, et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454- pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res 2011;21: 494-504.
58. Quince C, Lanzen A, Davenport RJ, et al. Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:38.
59. Patin NV, Kunin V, Lidström U, et al. Effects of OTU clustering and PCR artifacts on microbial diversity estimates. Microb Ecol 2013;65:709-19.
60. Lee CK, Herbold CW, Polson SW, et al. Groundtruthing next-gen sequencing for microbial ecology-biases and errors in community structure estimates from PCR amplicon pyrosequencing. PloS One 2012;7:e44224.
61. Sipos R, Székely AJ, Palatinszky M, et al. Effect of primer mismatch, annealing temperature and PCR cycle number on 16S rRNA gene-targetting bacterial community analysis. FEMSMicrobiol Ecol 2007;60:341-50.
62. Mao DP, Zhou Q, Chen CY, et al. Coverage evaluation of universal bacterial primers using the metagenomic datasets. BMCMicrobiol 2012;12:66.
63. Ahn JH, Kim BY, Song J, et al. Effects of PCR cycle number and DNA polymerase type on the 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial communities. JMicrobiol 2012;50:1071-4.
64. Vasileiadis S, Puglisi E, Arena M, et al. Soil bacterial diversity screening using single 16S rRNA gene V regions coupled with multi-million read generating sequencing technologies. PLoS One 2012;7:e42671.
65. Huber JA, Morrison HG, Huse SM, et al. Effect of PCR amplicon size on assessments of clone library microbial diversity and community structure. Environ Microbiol 2009;11: 1292-302.
66. Prosdocimi EM, Novati S, Bruno R, et al. Errors in ribosomal sequence datasets generated using PCRcoupled 'panbacterial' pyrosequencing, and the establishment of an improved approach. Mol Cell Probes 2013;27: 65-7.
67. Kembel SW, Wu M, Eisen JA., et al. Incorporating 16S gene copy number information improves estimates of microbial diversity and abundance. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8: e1002743.
68. Luo C, Tsementzi D, Kyrpides N, et al. Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. PLoS One 2012; 7:e30087.
69. Zhou J, Wu L, Deng Y, et al. Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J 2011;5:1303-13.
70. Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2011;7:1-8.
71. Cox MP, Peterson DA, Biggs PJ. Solexa QA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:485.
72. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2011;7:335-36.
73. Berger SA, Krompass D, Stamatakis A. Performance, accuracy, and web server for evolutionary placement of short sequence reads under maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 2011; 60:291-302.
74. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. Fast Tree: Computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 2009;26:1641-50.
75. Matsen FA, Kodner RB, Armbrust EV. Pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMCBioinformatics 2010;11:538.
76. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72: 5069-72.
77. Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh HJ, et al. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res 2011;21: 1552-60.
78. Monzoorul HM, Ghosh TS, Komanduri D, et al. SOrt-ITEMS: Sequence orthology based approach for improved taxonomic estimation of metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1722-30.
79. Gerlach W, Stoye J. Taxonomic classification of metagenomic shotgun sequences with CARMA3. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:e91.
80. Liu B, Gibbons T, Ghodsi M, et al. Meta Phyler: taxonomic profiling for metagenomic sequences. IEEE International Conference. Bioinform Biomed 2010;95-100.
81. Mohammed MH, Ghosh TS, Reddy R, et al. INDUS: a composition-based approach for rapid and accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences. BMC Genomics 2011;12(Suppl. 3):S4.
82. Rosen GL, Reichenberger ER, Rosenfeld AM. NBC: the Naïve Bayes classification tool webserver for taxonomic classification of metagenomic reads. Bioinformatics 2011;27: 127-9.
83. Sharma VK, Kumar N, Prakash T, et al. Fast and accurate taxonomic assignments of metagenomic sequences using Meta Bin. PLoS One 2012;7:e34030.
84. Diaz NN, Krause L, Goesmann A, et al. TACOA: taxonomic classification of environmental genomic fragments using a kernelized nearest neighbor approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:56.
85. Yang B, Peng Y, Leung HCM, et al. Meta Cluster: unsupervised binning of environmental genomic fragments and taxonomic annotation. New York, NY: ACM, 2010; 170-9.
86. Wang Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, et al. Meta Cluster 4.0: A novel binning algorithm for NGS reads and huge number of species. JComput Biol 2012;19:241-9.
87. Brady A, Salzberg SL. Phymm and Phymm BL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nat Methods 2009;6:673-6.
88. Wu M, Eisen JA. A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference. Genome Biol 2008;9:R151.
89. Stark M, Berger SA, Stamatakis A, et al. MLTree Map: accurate maximum likelihood placement of environmental DNA sequences into taxonomic and functional reference phylogenies. BMCGenomics 2010;11:461.
90. Munch K, Boomsma W, Huelsenbeck JP, et al. Statistical assignment of DNA sequences using Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst Biol 2008;57:750-7.
91. Mohammed MH, Ghosh TS, Singh NK, et al. SPHINX: an algorithm for taxonomic binning of metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 2011;27:22-30.
92. Singh R, Narayan V, McLenachan PA, et al. Detection and diversity of pathogenic Vibrio from Fiji. Environ Microbiol Rep 2012;4:403-11.
93. Pickett SB, Bergey CM, Di Fiore AA. Metagenomic study of Primate insect diet diversity. Am J Primatol 2012;10: 622-31.
94. Xiang Q, Soltis D, Soltis P. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred from matK and rbcL sequences. Am J Bot 1998;85:285.
95. Zhao X, Wang Q, Zhou J, Zhong Y. Phylogenetic relationships of taxaceae and its related groups inferred from nuclear 18S rRNA, chloroplast matK, rbcL, rps4, 16S rRNA and mitochondrial coxI sequences. J Genet Mol Biol 2006;17:81-93.
96. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PloS One 2011;6:e19254.
97. Raupach MJ, Astrin JJ, Hannig K, et al. Molecular species identification of Central European ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) using nuclear rDNA expansion segments and DNA barcodes. Front Zool 2010;7:e26.
98. Edwards RA, Rohwer F. Opinion: viral metagenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:504-10.
99. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. JMol Biol 1990;215:403-10.
100. Eddy SR. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998;14:755-63.
101. Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, et al. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res 2007;17:377-86.
102. Huson DH, Mitra S. Introduction to the analysis of environmental sequences: metagenomics with MEGAN. Methods Mol Biol 2012;856:415-29.
103. Kelley DR, Salzberg SL. Clustering metagenomic sequences with interpolated Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:544.
104. Bazinet AL, Cummings MPA. comparative evaluation of sequence classification programs. BMC Bioinformatics 2012; 13:92.
105. Lin H, Ma XMX, Chandramohan P, et al. Efficient data access for parallel BLAST. 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2005;72b.
106. Camacho C., Coulouris G, Avagyan V, et al. BLAST{thorn}: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10: 421.
107. Darling AE, Carey L, Feng W. The design, implementation, and evaluation of mpi BLAST. Proc Cluster World 2003; 13-5.
108. Vouzis PD, Sahinidis NV. GPU-BLAST: using graphics processors to accelerate protein sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 2011;27:182-8.
109. Ling C, Benkrid K. Design and implementation of a CUDA-compatible GPU-based core for gapped BLAST algorithm. Proc Comput Sci 2010;1:495-504.
110. Kent WJ. BLAT: The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 2002;12:656-64.
111. Ye Y, Choi JH, Tang H. RAPSearch: A fast protein similarity search tool for short reads. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:159.
112. Zhao Y, Tang H, Ye Y. RAPSearch2: A fast and memoryefficient protein similarity search tool for next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:125-6.
113. Huson D, Chao X. A poor man's BLASTX-high throughput metagenomic protein database search using PAUDA. Bioinformatics 2013. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics /btt254 (Advance Access publication 7 May 2013).
114. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-60.
115. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. JMol Biol 1981;147:195-7.
116. Ligowski L, Rudnicki W. An efficient implementation of Smith Waterman algorithm on GPU using CUDA, for massively parallel scanning of sequence databases. Processing 2009;1-8.
117. Liu Y, Schmidt B, Maskell DL. CUDASW{thorn}{thorn}2.0: Enhanced Smith-Waterman protein database search on CUDA-enabled GPUs based on SIMT and virtualized SIMD abstractions. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:93.
118. Nguyen DH, Pham PH. Applying GPUs for Smith-Waterman sequence alignment acceleration. GSTF J Comput 2012. doi: 10.5176_2010-2283_1.2.56.
119. Schnoes AM, Brown SD, Dodevski I., et al. Annotation error in public databases: misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput Biol 2009; 5:13.