A two-step representation of accounting measurement

Accounting Horizons

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 861-866

  Gao, Pingyang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890056997     PISSN: 08887993     EISSN: 15587975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/acch-10367     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Ball, R. 1989. The Firm as a Specialist Contracting Intermediary: Application to Accounting and Auditing. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.
2. Demski, J. S. 1973. The general impossibility of normative accounting standards. The Accounting Review 48: 718-723.
3. Dye, R. A. 2001. An evaluation of "Essays on Disclosure" and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 181-235.
4. Dye, R. A. 2002. Classifications manipulation and Nash accounting standards. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 1125-1162.
5. Dye, R. A., and S. Sridhar. 2004. Reliability-relevance trade-offs and the efficiency of aggregation. Journal of Accounting Research 42: 51-88.
6. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2010. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
7. Gao, P. 2013a. A measurement approach to conservatism and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 55: 251-268.
8. Gao, P. 2013b. Optimal Thresholds in Accounting Standards. Working paper, The University of Chicago.
9. Ijiri, Y. 1975. Theory of Accounting Measurement. Studies in Accounting Research No. 10. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
10. Leuz, C. 1998a. Embedded Contingencies in Earnings-Based Contracts. Unpublished manuscript, University of Frankfurt.
11. Leuz, C. 1998b. The role of accrual accounting in restricting dividends to shareholders. European Accounting Review 7: 579-604.