Carer preferences in economic evaluation and healthcare decision making

Patient

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 235-239

  Al Janabi, Hareth ^a   McCaffrey, Nikki ^b   Ratcliffe, Julie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; WELLBEING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAREGIVERS; DECISION MAKING; HOME CARE SERVICES; HOME NURSING; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE;

EID: 84890046530     PISSN: 11781653     EISSN: 11781661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0035-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Dahlberg L, Demack S, Bambra C. Age and gender of informal carers: a population-based study in the UK. Health Soc Care Community. 2007;15(5):439-45.
2. Pickard L. Informal care for older people provided by their adult children: projections of supply and demand to 2041 in England. University of Kent; 2008. Report No.: PSSRU Discussion Paper 2515. http://www.pssru.ac.uk/pdf/ dp2515.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2013
3. Tooth L, Russell A, Lucke J, Byrne G, Lee C, Wilson A, et al. Impact of cognitive and physical impairment on carer burden and quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:267-73.
4. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. London: The Stationery Office Limited; 2010. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment-data/file/213823/dh-117794.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2013
5. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. Br Med J. 2004;328:360-1.
6. Claxton K, Walker S, Palmer S, Sculpher M. Appropriate perspectives for healthcare decisions. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 2010. Report No.: CHE Research Paper 54. http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/ documents/papers/researchpapers/rp54-appropriate-perspectives-for-health-care- decisions.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2013
7. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O'Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
8. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
9. de Bekker-Grob E, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145-72.
10. Ratcliffe J, Lester L, Couzner L, Crotty M. An assessment of the relationship between informal caring and quality of life in older community-dwelling adults - more positives than negatives? Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21(1):35-46.
11. Al-Janabi H, Coast J, Flynn T. What do people value when they provide unpaid care to an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(1):111-21.
12. Wiseman V. Caring: the neglected health outcome? Or input? Health Policy. 1997;39:43-53.
13. Konig M, Wettstein A. Caring for relative with dementia: willingness-to-pay for a reduction in caregiver's burden. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2002;2(6):89-101.
14. Van Den Berg B, Brouwer W, Van Exel J, Koopmanschap M. Economic valuation of informal care: the contingent valuation method applied to informal caregiving. Health Econ. 2005;14:169-83.
15. Duff P, Dolphin C. Cost-benefit analysis of assistive technology to support independence for people with dementia - part 2: results from employing the ENABLE cost-benefit model in practice. Technol Disabil. 2007;19:79-90.
16. Wittenberg E, Prosser L. Disutility of illness for caregivers and families: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jun;31(6):489-500
17. Schulz R, Beach S. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282(23):2215-9.
18. Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(2):250-67.
19. Prosser L, Grosse S, Wittenberg E. Health utility elicitation: is there still a role for direct methods? Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(2):83-6.
20. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. 2013. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/D45/1E/ GuideToMethodsTechnologyAppraisal2013.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2013.
21. Goodrich K, Kaambwa B, Al-Janabi H. The inclusion of informal care in applied economic evaluation: a review. Value Health. 2012;15(6):975-81.
22. Coast J. Is economic evaluation in touch with society's health values? Br Med J. 2004;329:1233-6.
23. Al-Janabi H, Flynn T, Coast J. Estimation of a preference based carer experience scale. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):458-68.
24. Hoefman R, Van Exel J, Rose J, van de Wetering L, Brouwer W. A discrete choice experiment to obtain tariffs for valuing informal care situations measured with the CarerQol instrument. Med Decis Making. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
25. Gage H, Kaye J, Owen C, Trend P, Wade D. Evaluating rehabilitation using cost-consequences analysis: an example in Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:232-8.
26. Culyer A. The nature of the commodity 'health care' and its efficient allocation. Oxf Econ Pap. 1971;23(2):189-211.
27. Jacobsson F, Carstensen J, Borgquist L. Caring externalities in health economic evaluation: how are they related to severity of illness? Health Policy. 2005;73:172-82.
28. Prosser L, Ray T, O'Brien M, Kleinman K, Santoli J, Lieu T. Preferences and willingness-to-pay for health states prevented by pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Pediatrics. 2004;113:283-90.
29. Dickie M, Messman M. Parental altruism and the value of avoiding acute illness: are kids worth more than parents? J Environ Econ Manag. 2004;48:1146-74.
30. Basu A, Dale W, Elstein A, Meltzer D. A time tradeoff method for eliciting partner's quality of life due to patient's health states in prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:355-65.
31. Bergstrom T. Benefit-cost in a benevolent society. Am Econ Rev. 2006;96(1):339-51.
32. Basu A, Meltzer D. Implications of spillover effects within the family for medical cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ. 2005;24:751-73.
33. Gomes B, Calazani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson I. Heterogeneity and changes in preference for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2013;12:7.
34. Tang S, Liu T, Lai M, McCorkle M. Discrepancy in the preferences of place of death between terminally ill cancer patients and their primary family caregivers in Taiwan. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1560-6.
35. Neubauer S, Holle R, Menn P, Grossfeld-Schmitz M, Graesel E. Measurement of informal care time in a study of patients with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20:1160-76.
36. Tennstedt S, McKinlay J, Sullivan L. Informal care for frail elders: the role of secondary caregivers. Gerontologist. 1989;29(5):677-83.
37. Usita P, Hall S, Davis J. Role ambiguity in family caregiving. J Appl Gerontol. 2004;23(1):20-39.
38. Karlawish J, Klocinski M, Merz J, Clark C, Asch D. Caregivers' preferences for the treatment of people with Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 2000;55:1008-14.
39. Al-Janabi H, Flynn T, Coast J. QALYs and carers. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(12):1015-23.