Clinical feasibility of noninvasive visualization of lymphatic flow with principles of spin labeling MR imaging: Implications for lymphedema assessment

Radiology

Volumn 269, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 893-902

  Rane, Swati ^a,d   Donahue, Paula M C ^a,b   Towse, Ted ^a,d   Ridner, Sheila ^c   Chappell, Michael ^e,f   Jordi, John ^g   Gore, John ^a,d   Donahue, Manus J ^a,b,d  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^f JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g Siskin Hospital Lymphedema Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BLOOD FLOW; BODY FLUID; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; LYMPH FLOW; LYMPHATIC FLUID; LYMPHATIC PARAMETERS; LYMPHEDEMA; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MIDDLE AGED; NONINVASIVE ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPIN LABELING;

ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH; LYMPHEDEMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPIN LABELS;

EID: 84890043713     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120145     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Moseley AL, Carati CJ, Piller NB. A systematic review of common conservative therapies for arm lymphoedema secondary to breast cancer treatment. Ann Oncol 2007;18(4):639-646.
2. Armer J, Fu MR, Wainstock JM, Zagar E, Jacobs LK. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment, including sentinel lymph node biopsy. Lymphology 2004;37(2):73-91.
3. Langer I, Guller U, Berclaz G, et al. Morbidity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) alone versus SLN and completion axillary lymph node dissection after breast cancer surgery: a prospective Swiss multicenter study on 659 patients. Ann Surg 2007;245(3):452-461.
4. Warren AG, Brorson H, Borud LJ, Slavin SA. Lymphedema: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59(4):464-472.
5. Torres Lacomba M, Yuste Sánchez MJ, Zapico Goñi A, et al. Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial. BMJ 2010;340:b5396.
6. Lucarelli RT, Ogawa M, Kosaka N, Turkbey B, Kobayashi H, Choyke PL. New approaches to lymphatic imaging. Lymphat Res Biol 2009;7(4):205-214.
7. Modi S, Stanton AW, Svensson WE, Peters AM, Mortimer PS, Levick Jr. Human lymphatic pumping measured in healthy and lymphoedematous arms by lymphatic congestion lymphoscintigraphy. J Physiol 2007;583(Pt 1):271-285.
8. Luciani A, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Meignan M, Clement O. Lymph node imaging: basic principles. Eur J Radiol 2006;58(3):338- 344.
9. Barrett T, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Imaging of the lymphatic system: new horizons. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2006;1(6):230-245.
10. Hama Y, Koyama Y, Urano Y, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Two-color lymphatic mapping using Ig-conjugated near infrared optical probes. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127(10):2351-2356.
11. Kobayashi H, Kawamoto S, Bernardo M, Brechbiel MW, Knopp MV, Choyke PL. Delivery of gadolinium-labeled nanoparticles to the sentinel lymph node: comparison of the sentinel node visualization and estimations of intra-nodal gadolinium concentration by the magnetic resonance imaging. J Control Release 2006;111(3):343-351.
12. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23(1):37-45.
13. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Aronen HJ, et al. Susceptibility contrast imaging of cerebral blood volume: human experience. Magn Reson Med 1991;22(2):293-299; discussion 300-303.
14. Rudin M, Sauter A. Noninvasive determination of regional cerebral blood flow in rats using dynamic imaging with Gd(DTPA). Magn Reson Med 1991;22(1):32-46.
15. Tourdias T, Rodrigo S, Oppenheim C, et al. Pulsed arterial spin labeling applications in brain tumors: practical review. J Neuroradiol 2008;35(2):79-89.
16. Bokkers RP, van der Worp HB, Mali WP, Hendrikse J. Noninvasive MR imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with a carotid artery stenosis. Neurology 2009;73(11):869-875.
17. Detre JA, Samuels OB, Alsop DC, Gonzalez- At JB, Kasner SE, Raps EC. Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral blood flow with acetazolamide challenge in patients with cerebrovascular stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10(5):870-875.
18. Donahue MJ, Strother MK, Hendrikse J. Novel MRI approaches for assessing cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 2012;43(3):903-915.
19. Pfefferbaum A, Chanraud S, Pitel AL, et al. Cerebral blood flow in posterior cortical nodes of the default mode network decreases with task engagement but remains higher than in most brain regions. Cereb Cortex 2011;21(1):233-244.
20. Donahue MJ, Blicher JU, Østergaard L, et al. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and oxygen metabolism dynamics in human visual and motor cortex as measured by whole-brain multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009;29(11):1856-1866.
21. Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, van Zijl PC. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;52(3):679-682.
22. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed 1997;10(4-5):237-249.
23. Buxton RB. Quantifying CBF with arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22(6):723-726.
24. Dai W, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008;60(6):1488-1497.
25. Zuther JE. Lymphedema management: the comprehensive guide for practitioners. 2nd ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme, 2009.
26. Fischer M, Franzeck UK, Herrig I, et al. Flow velocity of single lymphatic capillaries in human skin. Am J Physiol 1996;270(1 Pt 2):H358-H363.
27. Berk DA, Swartz MA, Leu AJ, Jain RK. Transport in lymphatic capillaries. II. Microscopic velocity measurement with fluorescence photobleaching. Am J Physiol 1996;270(1 Pt 2):H330-H337.
28. Swartz MA, Berk DA, Jain RK. Transport in lymphatic capillaries. I. Macroscopic measurements using residence time distribution theory. Am J Physiol 1996;270(1 Pt 2):H324-H329.
29. Scaranelo AM, Eiada R, Jacks LM, Kulkarni SR, Crystal P. Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis: study of reproducibility and reliability. Radiology 2012;262(2):425-434.
30. Demetris AJ, Seaberg EC, Batts KP, et al. Reliability and predictive value of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database nomenclature and grading system for cellular rejection of liver allografts. Hepatology 1995;21(2):408-416.
31. Sena LM, Fishman SJ, Jenkins KJ, et al. Magnetic resonance lymphangiography with a nano-sized gadolinium-labeled dendrimer in small and large animal models. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2010;5(8):1183-1191.
32. Ye FQ, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. Noise reduction in 3D perfusion imaging by attenuating the static signal in arterial spin tagging (ASSIST). Magn Reson Med 2000;44(1):92-100.
33. Kim T, Kim SG. Quantitative MRI of cerebral arterial blood volume. Open Neuroimaging J 2011;5:136-145.