Patients' evaluation for the surgical management of nasal obstruction

Rhinology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 361-367

  Akduman, Davut ^a   Yanilmaz, Muhammed ^b   Haksever, Mehmet ^a   Döner, Fehmi ^c   Sayar, Zeynep ^a  

^a Bursa Sevket Yilmaz Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b FATIH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Medical Park Bursa Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Glasgow benefit inventory; Likert scale; Nasal obstruction; Nasal obstruction septoplasty eectiveness scale; Nasal valve surgery; Septoplasty; Turbinoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE SEPTUM; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURBINATE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL OBSTRUCTION; NASAL SEPTUM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURBINATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890031692     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4193/Rhino12.209     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Uppal S, Mistry H, Nadig S, Back G, Coatesworth A. Evaluation of patient benefit from nasal septal surgery for nasal obstruction. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005; 32: 129-137.
2. Devaiah AK, Keojampa BK. Surgery of the nasal septum. In: Stucker FJ, De Souza C, Kenyon GS, et al, eds: Rhinology and Facial Plastic Surgery. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2009: 181-185.
3. Dinis PB, Haider H. Septoplasty: Long-term evaluation of results. Evaluation studies. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002; 23: 85-90.
4. Harrill WC, Pillsbury HC 3rd, McGuirt WF, Stewar t MG. Radiofrequency turbinate reduction: a NOSE evaluation. Laryngoscope. 2007;117: 1912-1919.
5. Rhee JS, Poetker DM, Smith TL, Bustillo A, Burzynski M, Davis RE. Nasal valve surgery improves disease-specific quality of life. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 437-440.
6. Arunachalan PS, Kitcher E, Gray J, Wilson JA. Nasal septal surgery: evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes. Clin Otol. 2001; 26: 367-370.
7. Siegel N, Gliklich R, Taghizadeh F, Chang Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 122: 229-232.
8. McKiernan DC, Banfield G, Kumar R, Hinton AE. Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol. 2001; 26: 50-52.
9. Stewart EJ, Robinson K, Wilson JA. Assessment of patient benefit from rhinoplasty. Rhinology 1996; 34: 57-59.
10. Likert, Rensis. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932; 140: 1-55.
11. Constantian MB, Brian CR. The relative importance of septal and nasal valvular surgery in correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98: 38-54.
12. Bloching MB. Disorders of the nasal valve area. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 6: Doc07. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
13. Toriumi DM, Josen J, Weinberger M, Tardy ME Jr. Use of alar batten grafts for correction of nasal valve collapse. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 123: 802-808.
14. Kridel RW, Scott BA, Foda HM. The tongue-in-groove technique in septorhinoplasty. A 10-year experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 1: 246-258.
15. Akduman D, Haksever M, Yanilmaz M. Repositioning of the caudal septal dislocations with notching and suturing the cartilage to the nasal spine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar 30. [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2458-4.
16. Pastorek NJ. Becker DG. Treating the caudal septal deflection. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 2: 217-220.
17. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinoiaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996; 105: 415-422.
18. Konstantinidis I, Triaridis S, Triaridis A, Karagiannidis K, Kontzoglou G. Long term results following nasal septal surgery. Focus on patients' satisfaction. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005; 32: 369-374
19. Chandra RK, Patadia MO, Raviv J. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009; 42: 207-225.
20. Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2010; 120: 635-638.
21. Broms P, Ivarsson A, Jonson B, Rhinomanometry I. Simple equipment. Acta Otolaryngol. 1982; 93: 455-460.
22. Reber M, Rahm F, Monnier P. The role of acoustic rhinometry in the pre-and postoperative evaluation of results for nasal obstruction. Rhinology. 1998; 36: 184-187.
23. Youlton LTF. The peak nasal inspiratory flow meter: a new instrument for the assessment of response to immunotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergol Immunopathol. 1980; 8: 344-347.
24. Kahveci OK, Miman MC, Yucel A, Yucedag F, Okur E, Altuntas A. The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012; 39: 275-279.
25. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 157-163.
26. Bezerra TF, Padua FG, Pilan RR, Stewart MG, Voegels RL. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality of life questionnaire: the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation questionnaire. Rhinology. 2011; 49: 227-231.
27. Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT, Johnson JT. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 283-290.
28. Croy I, Hummel T, Pade A, Pade J. Quality of life following nasal surgery. Laryngoscope. 2010; 120: 826-831.