Assessing the validity and reproducibility of genome-scale predictions

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 2844-2851

  Sugden, Lauren A ^a   Tackett, Michael R ^b   Savva, Yiannis A ^c   Thompson, William A ^a   Lawrence, Charles E ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b St Laurent Institute   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DEAMINASE;

ANIMAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RNA EDITING; STATISTICAL MODEL; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

ADENOSINE DEAMINASE; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; GENOME; GENOMICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RNA EDITING; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84890015963     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt508     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Auer, P.L. and Doerge, R.W. (2010) Statistical design and analysis of RNA sequencing data. Genetics, 185, 405-416.
2. Baggerly, K.A. et al. (2003) Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation. Bioinformatics, 19, 1477-1483.
3. Barrett, J.C. et al. (2008) Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease. Nat. Genet., 40, 955-962.
4. Barrows, N.J. et al. (2010) Factors affecting reproducibility between genome-scale siRNA-based screens. J. Biomol. Screen., 15, 735-747.
5. Bass, B.L. and Weintraub, H. (1988) An unwinding activity that covalently modifies its double-stranded RNA substrate. Cell, 55, 1089-1098.
6. Begley, C.G. and Ellis, L.M. (2012) Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483, 531-533.
7. Bell, A.W. et al. (2009) A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Meth., 6, 423-430.
8. Black, M.A. and Doerge, R.W. (2002) Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 18, 1609-1616.
9. Boulesteix, A.L. and Slawski, M. (2009) Stability and aggregation of ranked gene lists. Brief. Bioinform., 10, 556-568.
10. Button, K.S. et al. (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 14, 365-376.
11. DeVeale, B. et al. (2012) Critical evaluation of imprinted gene expression by RNAseq: a new perspective. PLoS Genet., 8, e1002600.
12. Editorial. (2012a) Further confirmation needed. Nat. Biotechnol., 30, 806.
13. Editorial. (2012b) Error prone: biologists must realize the piffalls of work on massive amounts of data. Nature, 487, 406.
14. Gelman, A. et al. (2003) Hierarchical models. In: Bayesian Data Analysis. 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp. 120-160.
15. Glaus, P. et al. (2012) Identifying differentially expressed ranscripts from RNA-seq data with biological variation. Bioinformatics, 28, 1721-1728.
16. Gregg, C. et al. (2010) High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science, 329, 643-648.
17. Hoopengardner, B. et al. (2003) Nervous system targets of RNA editing identified by comparative genomics. Science, 301, 832-836.
18. Hoskins, R.A. et al. (2011) Genome-wide analysis of promoter architecture in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res., 21, 182-192.
19. Hughes, T.R. (2009) 'Validation' in genome-scale research. J. Biol., 8, 3-5.
20. Hunt, K.A. et al. (2012) Rare and functional SIAE variants are not associated with autoimmune disease risk in up to 66, 924 individuals of European ancestry. Nat. Genet., 44, 3-5.
21. Ioannidis, J.P.A. et al. (2009) Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nat. Genet., 41, 149-155.
22. Jepson, J.E.C. et al. (2012) Visualizing adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in the drosophila nervous system. Nat. Meth., 9, 189-194.
23. Ji, H. and Liu, X.S. (2010) Analyzing omics data using hierarchical models. Nat. Biotech., 28, 337-340.
24. Kerr, M.K. and Churchill, G.A. (2001) Bootstrapping cluster analysis: assessing the reliability of conclusions from microarray experiments. PNAS, 98, 8961-8965.
25. Kleinman, C.L. and Majewski, J. (2012) Comment on Widespread RNA and DNA Sequence Differences in the Human Transcriptome. Science, 335, 1302.
26. Kuo, W. et al. (2006) A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridization-based technologies. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 832-840.
27. Leek, J.T. et al. (2010) Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 733-739.
28. Li, Q. et al. (2011a) Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments. Ann. Appl. Stat., 5, 1752-1779.
29. Li, M. et al. (2011b) Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the Human Transcriptome. Science, 333, 53-58.
30. Li, X. et al. (2008) Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol., 6, e27.
31. Lin, W. et al. (2012) Comment on widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. Science, 335, 1302.
32. MacArthur, D. (2012) Face up to false positives. Nature, 487, 427-428.
33. Macleod, M. (2011) Why animal research needs to improve. Nature, 477, 511-511.
34. MAQC Consortium. (2006) The microarray quality control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 1151-1161.
35. McShane, L.M. et al. (2002) Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics, 18, 1462-1469.
36. Moonesinghe, R. et al. (2008) Required sample size and nonreplicability thresholds for heterogeneous genetic associations. PNAS, 105, 617-622.
37. Nègre, N. et al. (2010) A comprehensive map of insulator elements for the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet., 6, e1000814.
38. Nishikura, K. et al. (1991) Substrate specificity of the dsRNA unwinding/modifying activity. EMBO J., 10, 3523-3532.
39. Nishikura, K. (2010) Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 79, 321-349.
40. Pahl, R. et al. (2009) Optimal multistage designs - a general framework for efficient genome-wide association studies. Biostatistics, 10, 297-309.
41. Palladino, M.J. et al. (2000) A-to-I Pre-mRNA editing in Drosophila is primarily involved in adult nervous system function and integrity. Cell, 102, 437-449.
42. Pan, W. et al. (2002) How many replicates of arrays are required to detect gene expression changes in microarray experiments? A mixture model approach. Genome Biol., 3 research 0022.
43. Pickrell, J.K. et al. (2012) Comment on widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. Science, 335, 1302.
44. Prinz, F. et al. (2011) Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 10, 712-712.
45. Russell, J.F. (2013) If a job is worth doing, it is worth doing twice. Nature, 496, 7-7.
46. Shanks, D.R. et al. (2013) Priming intelligent behavior: an elusive phenomenon. PLoS One, 8, e56515.
47. St. Laurent, G. et al. (2013) Genome-wide analysis of A-to-I RNA editing via single molecule sequencing in Drosophila. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, in press.
48. Stapleton, M. et al. (2006) RNA editing in Drosophila melanogaster: new targets and functional consequences. RNA, 12, 1922-1932.
49. Storey, J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 64, 479-498.
50. Surolia, I. et al. (2010) Functionally defective germline variants of sialic acid acetylesterase in autoimmunity. Nature, 466, 243-247.
51. Tibshirani, R. (2005) A simple method for assessing sample sizes in microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 106.
52. Van Hijum, S. et al. (2005) A generally applicable validation scheme for the assessment of factors involved in reproducibility and quality of DNA-microarray data. BMC Genomics, 6, 77.
53. Vaux, D.L. (2012) Know when your numbers are significant. Nature, 492, 180-181.
54. Vêncio, R.Z.N. et al. (2004) Bayesian model accounting for within-class biological variability in Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE). BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 119.
55. Wei, C. et al. (2004) Sample size for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. BMC Genomics, 5, 87.
56. Xia, L.C. et al. (2011) Extended local similarity analysis (eLSA) of microbial community and other time series data with replicates. BMC Syst. Biol., 5, S15.
57. Yang, X. et al. (2006) Similarities of ordered gene lists. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 4, 693-708.
58. Yong, E. (2012) Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature, 485, 298-300.
59. Zeggini, E. and Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2009) Meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies. Pharmacogenomics, 10, 191-201.
60. Zeggini, E. et al. (2008) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and largescale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet., 40, 638-645.
61. Zeitlinger, J. et al. (2007) RNA polymerase stalling at developmental control genes in the Drosophila melanogaster embyo. Nat. Genet., 39, 1512-1516.
62. Zhang, M. et al. (2009) Evaluating reproducibility of differential expression discoveries in microarray studies by considering correlated molecular changes. Bioinformatics, 25, 1662-1668.