Communication in design

Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 232-261

  Eckert, Claudia ^a   Maier, Anja ^a   McMahon, Chris ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889977582     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Agar M (1996) The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. University of Maryland Press
2. Ahmed S, Blessing L,Wallace K (1999) The relationships between data, information and knowledge based on a preliminary study of engineering designers. ASME DTM-99, Las Vegas, NE, USA
3. Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107-136
4. Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press
5. Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Clarendon
6. Baldwin AN,Austin SA, Hassan TM,Thorpe A (1999) Modelling information flow during the conceptual and schematic stages of building design. Construction Management and Economics, 17: 155-167
7. Belbin RM (1991) Management teams. Butterworth-Heinemann
8. Bly SA (1988) A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings. CSCW'88, Portland, OR, USA
9. Bly SA, Minneman SL (1990) Commune: A shared drawing surface. COIS-90, Boston, MA, USA
10. Brereton, MF, Cannon DM, Mabogunje A, Leifer LJ (1996) Collaboration in design teams: Mediating design progress through social interaction. In: Analysing design activity. John Wiley
11. Bucciarelli LL (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press
12. Clark HH (1992) Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press
13. Clark HH (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press
14. Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: Perspectives on socially shared cognition.American Psychological Association
15. Clark HH, Carlson TB (1982) Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58: 322-373
16. Clark HH, Murphy GL (1982) Audience design in meaning and reference. In: Language and comprehension. North-Holland
17. Clark HH, Schreuder R, Buttrick S (1983) Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22: 245-258
18. Clarkson PJ, Hamilton JR (2000) 'Signposting-: A parameter-driven taskbased model of the design process. Research in Engineering Design, 12(1): 18-38
19. Cockburn A (2001) Agile software development. Addison Wesley
20. Cross NG, Christiaans HHCM, Dorst K eds (1996) Analysing design activity. John Wiley
21. Dahlbom B, Mathiassen L (1995) Computers in context: The philosophy and practice of systems design. Blackwell
22. Delia JG (1977) Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63: 66-83
23. DeSanctis G, Gallupe B (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5): 589-609
24. Eckert CM (2001)The communication bottleneck in knitwear design: Analysis and computing solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10(1): 29-74
25. Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2003) If only I knew what you were going to do: Communication and planning in large organizations. In: Methods and tools for co-operative and integrated design. Kluwer Academic
26. Eckert CM, Stacey MK (2000) Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Design Studies, 21: 523-538
27. Eckert CM, Stacey MK (2001) Dimensions of communication in design. ICED-01, Glasgow, UK
28. Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ, Stacey MK (2001) Information flow in engineering companies: Problems and their causes. ICED-01, Glasgow, UK. Figure 9.8 has been reproduced from Design management - process and information issues (ICED01), 2001, pp 43-60, Figure 1
29. Eckert CM, Stacey MK, Earl CF (2003) Ambiguity is a double-edged sword: Similarity references in communication. ICED-03, Stockholm, Sweden
30. Ellis CA, Gibbs SJ, Rein GL (1991) Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1): 39-58
31. Flanagan T, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2003) Parameter trails. ICED-03, Stockholm, Sweden
32. Frost R (1994) A suggested taxonomy for engineering design problems. Journal of Engineering Design, 5(4): 399-410
33. Gomes S, Eynard B, Magnon L (2001) A multi-site design experience using a computer supported collaborative work tool. ICED-01, Glasgow, UK
34. Goodwin C (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 1489-1522
35. Habermas J (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp
36. Henderson K (1999) On line and on paper. MIT Press
37. Huang W,Wei KK (1997)Task as a moderator for the effects of group support systems on group influence processes. European Journal of Information Systems, 6: 208-217
38. Hurley R (1995) Group culture and its effect on innovative productivity. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12(1/2): 57-75
39. Hymes D, Gumperz JJ eds (1972) Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Holt, Rinehart and Winston
40. Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Design Studies, 12: 3-11
41. Johansen R (1988) Groupware: Computer support for business teams. Free Press
42. Kaplan SM,Tolone WJ, Bogia DP, Bignoli C (1992) Flexible, active support for collaborative work with conversation builder. CSCW'92, Toronto, Canada
43. Kunz JC, Christiansen TR, Cohen GP, Jin Y, Levitt RE (1998) The virtual design team: A computational simulation model of project organizations. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 41(11): 84-92
44. Levelt WJM (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press
45. Lotus Notes (2001) http://www.lotus.com
46. Maletzke G (1963) Psychologie der Massenkommunikation.Verlag Hans Bredow Institut
47. McGregor S,Thomson AI, Juster NP (2001) Information sharing within a distributed, collaborative design process: A case study. ASME CIE-01, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
48. Merten K (1976) Reflexivität als Grundbegriff der Kommunikationsforschung. Publizistik, 21: 171-179
49. Merten K (1999) Einführung in die Kommunikationswissenschaft. 1/1: Grundlagen der Kommunikationswissenschaft. LIT Microsoft Exchange (2003) http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/
50. Minneman SL (1991) The social construction of a technical reality: Empirical studies of group engineering design practice. PhD thesis, Stanford University, CA, USA
51. Ostergaard KJ, Summers JD (2003) A taxonomy for collaborative design. ASME DAC-03, Chicago, IL, USA
52. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: A systematic approach. Springer
53. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage
54. Penn A, Desyllas J,Vaughan L (1999) The space of innovation: Interaction and communication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26: 193-218
55. Reddy M (1979)The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In: Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press
56. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books
57. Searle JR (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge University Press
58. Shannon CE,Weaver W (1949)The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press
59. SMAC (1995) Suppliers and manufacturers in automotive collaboration. European Community RACE Research Project R2112
60. Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2003) Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 125: 240-252
61. Stacey MK, Eckert CM (2003) Against ambiguity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(2): 153-183
62. Tang JC (1989) Listing, drawing and gesturing in design: A study of the use of shared workspaces by design teams. PhD thesis, Stanford University, CA, USA
63. Thomson AI, Ion WJ,Temple BK,Allan M, Kernohan N, Davidson S (2001 VIDEEO - virtual development enterprise for Europe. ICED'01, Glasgow, UK
64. Tuomi I (1999) Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3): 103-117
65. Ullman D (1992) A taxonomy for mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design, 3: 179-189
66. Ullman D (1995) A taxonomy for classifying engineering design decision problems and support systems. AI EDAM, 9: 427-438 Wiki (2003) http://wiki.org/