Implementing decentralized local government: A treacherous road with potholes, detours and road closures

Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and the Rebuilding of Indonesia: The ‘Big Bang’ Program and its Economic Consequences

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 301-337

  Shah, Anwar ^a   Thompson, Theresa ^a  

^a WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889964195     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845421656.00023     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bednar, Jenna (2000). ‘Formal Theory and Federalism’. APSA-CP Newsletter 11 (1), 19-23.
2. Brodjonegoro, Bambang and Shinji Asanuma (2000). ‘Regional Autonomy and Fiscal Decentralization in Democratic Indonesia’. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 41 (2), 111-22.
3. Eaton, Kent (2001). ‘Political Obstacles to Decentralization: Evidence from Argentina and the Philippines’. Development and Change 32, 101-27.
4. Ehdaie, Jaber (1994). Fiscal Decentralization and the Size of Government. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 1387. Washington, DC: World Bank.
5. Gurgur, Tugrul and Anwar Shah (2002). ‘Localization and Corruption: Panacea or Pandora’s box’. In Ehtisham Ahmad and Vito Tanzi (eds), Managing Fiscal Decentralization. London and New York: Routledge Press, pp. 46-67.
6. Hofman, Bert and Kai Kaiser (2002). ‘The Making of the Big Bang and its Aftermath: A Political Economy Perspective’. Paper presented at the Conference ‘Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia?' A Conference sponsored by the International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, 1-3 May.
7. Manor, James (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
8. Remmer, Karen and Erik Wibbels (2000). ‘The Political Economy of Decentralization in Latin America’. APSA-CP Newsletter 11 (1), 28-31.
9. Rose-Ackerman, Susan (2000). ‘The Economics and Politics of Federalism: Tensions and Complementarities’. APSA-CP Newsletter 11 (1), 16-19.
10. Shah, Anwar (1988). ‘Capitalization and the Theory of Local Public Finance: An Interpretive Essay’. Journal of Economic Surveys 2 (3), 209-43.
11. Shah, Anwar (1994). The Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Developing and Emerging Market Economies. World Bank Policy and Research Series No. 23. Washington, DC: World Bank
12. Shah, Anwar (1998a). Balance, Accountability and Responsiveness: Lessons about Decentralization. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 2021. Washington, DC: World Bank.
13. Shah, Anwar (1998b). ‘Indonesia and Pakistan: Fiscal Decentralization - An Elusive Goal?' In Richard Bird and Francois Vaillancourt (eds), Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Shah, Anwar (1999). ‘Governing for Results in Globalized and Localized World’. The Pakistan Development Review 38 (4, Part I), 385-431.
15. Shah, Anwar (2001). ‘Inter-jurisdictional Competition and Federal Cooperation. To Compete or to Cooperate? That’s not the Question’. Presented at the International Forum on Federalism in Mexico: Local and Global Challenges, held in Veracruz, Mexico, 14-17 November 2001.
16. Shah, Anwar et al. (1994). Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Indonesia. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 239. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17. Watts, Ronald L. (1999). ‘Comparing Federal Systems’. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
18. Willis, Eliza, Christopher Garman and Stephan Haggard (1999). ‘The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America’. Latin American Research Review, 34 (1), 7-46.
19. World Bank (2000). Entering the 21st Century. World Development Report 1999/2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. World Bank (2001). Decentralization in the Transition Economies: Challenges and the Road Ahead. Washington, DC.
21. World Bank (forthcoming). Indonesia - Public Expenditure Review.