Using implantation biopsies as a surrogate to evaluate selection criteria for living kidney donors

Transplantation

Volumn 96, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 975-980

  Chauhan, Ashutosh ^a   Diwan, Tayyab S ^a   Franco Palacios, Carlos R ^a   Dean, Patrick G ^a   Heimbach, Julie K ^a   Chow, George K ^a   Prieto, Mikel ^a   Cosio, Fernando G ^a   Taler, Sandra J ^a   Textor, Stephen C ^a   Kudva, Yogish C ^a   Cornell, Lynn D ^b   Stegall, Mark D ^a  

^a Rochester Methodist Hospital   (United States)

^b Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Implantation allograft biopsies; Living kidney donor; Selection criteria

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERTENSION; IMPLANTATION BIOPSY; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROALBUMINURIA; MODERATE TO SEVERE CHANGES SCORING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BIOPSY; BLOOD PRESSURE; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84889888642     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a2b455     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Collin AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C. US Renal Data System, USRDS 2009 annual data report. Am J Kidney Disease 2010; 55: S1.
2. Saran R, Marshall M, Madsen R, et al. Long term follow up of kidney donors; a longitudinal study. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 1997; 12: 1615.
3. Fehr man-Ekholm I, Duner F, Brink B, et al. No evidence of accelerated loss of kidney function in living donors; results from a cross sectional follow up. Transplantation 2001; 72: 444.
4. Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, et al. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA 2010; 303: 959.
5. Gibney EM, Parikh CR, Garg AX. Age, gender, race and association with kidney failure following living kidney donation. Transplant Proc 2008; 40: 1337.
6. Reese PP, Feldman HI, McBride MA, et al. Substantial variation in the acceptance of medically complex live kidney donors across US renal transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2062.
7. Nogueira JM, Weir MR, Jacobs S, et al. A study of renal outcomes in obese living kidney donors. Transplantation 2010; 90: 993.
8. Rea DJ, Heimbach JK, Grande JP, et al. Glomerular volume and renal histology in obese and non obese living kidney donors. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 1636.
9. Heimbach JK, Taler SJ, Prieto M, et al. Obesity in living kidney donors: Clinical characteristics and outcomes in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1057.
10. Textor S, Taler S, Driscoll N, et al. Blood pressure and renal function after kidney donation from hypertensive living donors. Transplantation 2004; 78: 276.
11. Mancilla E, Casado CA, Uribe NU, et al. Time zero biopsy in living kidney transplantation: A valuable opportunity to correlate pre donation clinical data with histological abnormalities. Transplantation 2008; 86: 1684.
12. Cosio FG, Grande JP, Larson TS, et al. Kidney allograft fibrosis and atrophy early after living donor transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1130.
13. Rook M, Hofker HS, Van Son WJ, et al. Predictive capacity of pre donation GFR and renal reserve capacity for donor renal function after living kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1653.
14. Goecke H, Ortiz AM, Troncoso P, et al. Influence of the kidney histology at the time of donation on long term kidney function in living kidney donors. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 3351.
15. Sund S, Reisaeter A, Fauchald P, et al. Living donor kidney transplants: A biopsy study 1 year after transplantation, compared to baseline changes and correlation to kidney function at 1 and 3 years. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 1999; 14: 2445.
16. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 753.