Selected Mesostructure Properties in Loblolly Pine from Arkansas Plantations

Characterization of the Cellulosic Cell Wall

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 149-170

  Kretschmann, David E ^a   Cramer, Steven M ^b   Lakes, Roderic ^b   Schmidt, Troy ^b  

^a FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Annual growth; Biological processes; Fertilization; Pine plantation; Property differences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889830354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470999714.ch12     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. ASTM. 2004. International Book of Standards. D 2915, Standard Practice for Evaluating Allowable Properties for Grades of Structural Lumber. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
2. Bendtsen, B.A., and J.F. Senft. 1986. Mechanical and anatomical properties in individual growth rings of plantation-grown eastern cottonwood and loblolly pine. Wood and Fiber Science 18(1): 23-28.
3. Biblis, E.J. 1969. Transitional variation and relationships among properties within loblolly pine growth rings. Wood Science and Technology 3: 14-24.
4. Brody, M., L.S. Cook, and R.S. Lakes. 1995. Apparatus for measuring viscoelastic properties over ten decades: Refinements. Review of Scientific Instruments 66(11): 5292-5297.
5. Chen, C.P., and R.S. Lakes. 1989. Apparatus for determining viscoelastic properties of materials over ten decades of frequency and time. Journal of Rheology 33: 1231-1249.
6. Cramer, S.M., D.E. Kretschmann, R. Lakes, and T. Schmidt. 2005. Earlywood and latewood elastic properties in loblolly pine. Holzforschung. (Vol. 59, pp. 531-538).
7. Goggans, J.F. 1964. Correlation and heritability of certain wood properties in loblolly pine. Tappi Journal 47: 318-322.
8. Groom, L., L. Mott, and S. Shaler. 2002. Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part I. Determination and variability of stress-strain curves with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood and Fiber Science 34(2): 14-27.
9. Groom, L., S. Shaler, and L. Mott. 2002. Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part III. Global relationships between fiber properties and fiber location within an individual tree. Wood and Fiber Science 34(2): 238-250.
10. Hodge, G.R., and R.C. Purnell. 1993. Genetic parameter estimates for wood density, transition age, and radial growth in slash pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 1881-1891.
11. Kretschmann, D.E., H.A. Alden and S. Verrill. 1998. Variations of microfibril angle in loblolly pine: Comparison of iodine crystallization and X-ray diffraction techniques. In B.G. Butterfield, ed. Microfibril Angle in Wood, pp. 157-176. University of Canterbury, New Zealand. International Association of Wood Anatomists.
12. Larson, P. 1969. Wood Formation and the Concept ofWood Quality. School of Forestry Bulletin No. 74. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University. 54 pp.
13. Larson, P.R., D.E. Kretschmann, A. Clark III, and J.G. Isebrands. 2001. Juvenile Wood Formation and Properties in Southern Pine. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-129. Madison, Wisconsin: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
14. Megraw, R.A. 1985. Wood Quality Factors in Loblolly Pine. Atlanta, Georgia: Tappi Press. pp. 88
15. Mott, L., L. Groom, and S. Shaler. 2002. Mechanical properties of individual southern pine fibers. Part II. Comparison of earlywood and latewood fibers with respect to tree height and juvenility. Wood and Fiber Science 34(2): 221-237.
16. Paul, B.H. 1958. Specific gravity changes in southern pines. Southern Lumberman 197: 122-124.
17. Pew, J.C, and R.G. Knechtges. 1939. Cross-sectional dimensions of fibers in relation to paper making properties of loblolly pine. Paper Trade Journal 109: 46-48.
18. Verrill, S.P., D.E. Kretschmann, and V.L. Herian. 2001. JMFA-A Graphically Interactive Java Program That Fits Microfibril Angle X-ray Diffraction Data. Research Note FPL-RN-0283. Madison, Wisconsin: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 44 pp.
19. Walker, J.C.F., and B.G. Butterfield. 1995. The importance of microfibril angle for the processing industry. New Zealand Forestry, November.
20. Ying, L., D.E. Kretschmann, and B.A. Bendtsen. 1994. Longitudinal shrinkage in fast-growth loblolly pine plantation wood. Forest Products Journal 44(1): 58-62.