Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000-2010

JAMA

Volumn 310, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 2426-2434

  Kawwass, Jennifer F ^a,b   Monsour, Michael ^b   Crawford, Sara ^b   Kissin, Dmitry M ^a,b   Session, Donna R ^a   Kulkarni, Aniket D ^b   Jamieson, Denise J ^a,b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MIDDLE AGED; OOCYTE DONATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; BIRTH WEIGHT; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MIDDLE AGED; OOCYTE DONATION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84889824851     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280924     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Matthews TJ, Hamilton BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. NCHS Data Brief. 2009;(21):1-8.
2. Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):548-558.
3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Family Database. http://www.oecd.org/social/soc/oecdfamilydatabase.htm. 2012. Accessed March 19, 2013.
4. Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1410-1418.
5. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al FASTER Consortium. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5, pt 1):983-990.
6. Ziadeh S, Yahaya A. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001;265(1):30-33.
7. Kort DH, Gosselin J, Choi JM, Thornton MH, Cleary-Goldman J, Sauer MV. Pregnancy after age 50: defining risks for mother and child. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(4):245-250.
8. Stoop D, Baumgarten M, Haentjens P, et al. Obstetric outcome in donor oocyte pregnancies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:42.
9. Vincent-Rohfritsch A, Le Ray C, Anselem O, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Pregnancy in women aged 43 years or older: maternal and perinatal risks [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012;41(5):468-475.
10. Tranquilli AL, Biondini V, Talebi Chahvar S, Corradetti A, Tranquilli D, Giannubilo S. Perinatal outcomes in oocyte donor pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(13):1263-1267.
11. Laskov I, Birnbaum R, Maslovitz S, Kupferminc M, Lessing J, Many A. Outcome of singleton pregnancy in women ≥45 years old: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(11):2190-2193.
12. Shrim A, Levin I, Mallozzi A, et al. Does very advanced maternal age, with or without egg donation, really increase obstetric risk in a large tertiary center? J Perinat Med. 2010;38(6):645-650.
13. Paulson RJ, Boostanfar R, Saadat P, et al. Pregnancy in the sixth decade of life: obstetric outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA. 2002;288(18):2320-2323.
14. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, Beyene J, Ohlsson A; Knowledge Synthesis Group. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146(2):138-148.
15. Joshi N, Kissin D, Anderson JE, Session D, Macaluso M, Jamieson DJ. Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):843-851.
16. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 [FCSRCA]. Pub L No. 102-4931992.
17. Adashi EY, Wyden R. Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs. JAMA. 2011;306(10):1135-1136.
18. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Flowers L, et al Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012;61(7):1-23.
19. Stillman RJ, Richter KS, Jones HWJr. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2599-2607.
20. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):835-842.
21. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced age: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(2):337-340.
22. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):44-46.
23. Steinberg ML, Boulet S, Kissin D, Warner L, Jamieson DJ. Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome - United States, 1999 to 2010. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(7):1937-1943.
24. Kawwass JF, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Boulet S, Jamieson DJ. Tubal factor infertility and perinatal risk after assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1263-1271.