Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: Which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Klomp, Trudy ^a   de Jonge, Ank ^a   Hutton, Eileen K ^b   Lagro Janssen, Antoine L M ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PETHIDINE; REMIFENTANIL;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY ROOM; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; HOME DELIVERY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABOR ONSET; LABOR PAIN; MATERNAL CARE; MIDWIFE ATTITUDE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIMIPARA; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ADULT; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HOME CHILDBIRTH; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LABOR ONSET; MIDWIFERY; NETHERLANDS; PARITY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84889820083     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-230     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Melzack R. From the gate to the neuromatrix. Pain 1999, 6:S121-S126.
2. Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:S16-S24.
3. Niven C. Psychological Care for Families: Before, During and After Birth 1992, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
4. Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R. More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med 2008, 6:7. 10.1186/1741-7015-6-7, 2358911, 18366632.
5. de Vries R. A Pleasing Birth: Midwifery and Maternity Care in the Netherlands 2005, Amsterdam: University Press.
6. Hayes-Klein H. Introduction: my story. Conference papers/Human rights in childbirth, International conference of jurists, midwives & obstetricians 2012, 11-21. The Netherlands: Bynkers Hoek, The Hageue, Hayes-Klein H.
7. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 12. CD000331.
8. Hutton EK, Kasperink M, Rutten M, Reitsma A, Wainman B. Sterile water injection for labour pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG 2009, 116:1158-1166. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02221.x, 19459860.
9. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 3. CD009234.
10. Christiansen P, Klostergaard KM, Terp MR, Poulsen C, Agger AO, Rasmussen KL. [Long-memory of labor pain]. Ugeskr Laeger 2002, 164:4927-4929.
11. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:S160-S172.
12. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Weston J. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 7. CD003766.
13. Christiaens W, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, de Vries R. Trends in the medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery 2013, 29:e1-e8. 10.1016/j.midw.2012.08.010, 23266221.
14. Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Epidural and spinal anesthesia use during labor: 27-state reporting area, 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011, 59:1-13. 16.
15. Marmor TR, Krol DM. Labor pain management in the United States: understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:S173-S180.
16. Van den Bussche E, Crombez G, Eccleston C, Sullivan MJ. Why women prefer epidural analgesia during childbirth: the role of beliefs about epidural analgesia and pain catastrophizing. Eur J Pain 2007, 11:275-282. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.03.002, 16624602.
17. PRN The Netherlands perinatal registry. Perinatale zorg in Nederland 2001-2009 http://www.perinatreg.nl/jaarboeken_zorg_in_nederland, PRN.
18. Klomp T, Mannien J, De JA, Hutton EK, Lagro-Janssen AL. What do midwives need to know about approaches of women towards labour pain management? A qualitative interview study into expectations of management of labour pain for pregnant women receiving midwife-led care in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2013, doi:pii: S0266-6138(13)00153-8. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.013. [Epub ahead of print].
19. CBO Guideline pharmacological pain relief during labour (Richtlijn Medicamenteuze Pijnbehandeling tijdens de bevalling) 2008, Utrecht: Dutch Organisation of Anaesthesiology (NVA) and Dutch Organisation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG), CBO.
20. Mannien J, Klomp T, Wiegers T, Pereboom M, de JA, et al. Evaluation of primary care midwifery in The Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER). BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:69. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-69, 3331850, 22433820.
21. Le Ray C, Goffinet F, Palot M, Garel M, Blondel B. Factors associated with the choice of delivery without epidural analgesia in women at low risk in France. Birth 2008, 35:171-178. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00237.x, 18844642.
22. Jimenez-Puente A, Benitez-Parejo N, Del Diego-Salas J, Rivas-Ruiz F, Maanon-Di LC. Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:207. 10.1186/1472-6963-12-207, 3411410, 22818255.
23. Green JM. Expectations and experiences of pain in labor: findings from a large prospective study. Birth 1993, 20:65-72. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00419.x, 8240609.
24. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) 2013, http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/dossiers/allochtonen/nieuws/default.htm, Statistics Netherlands (CBS).
25. Walraven C. Review: the effect of audit and feedback on guideline adherence and patient outcomes is limited. Ann Intern Med 2013, 158:JC11.
26. Schytt E, Waldenstrom U. Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010, 89:238-242. 10.3109/00016340903280974, 19824867.
27. Christiaens W, Verhaeghe M, Bracke P. Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:268. 10.1186/1472-6963-10-268, 2944275, 20831798.
28. Walsh D, Devane D. A metasynthesis of midwife-led care. Qual Health Res 2012, 22:897-910. 10.1177/1049732312440330, 22427456.
29. Begley C, Devane D, Clarke M, McCann C, Hughes P, Reilly M, et al. Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:85. 10.1186/1471-2393-11-85, 3226589, 22035427.
30. Gottvall K, Waldenstrom U, Tingstig C, Grunewald C. In-hospital birth center with the same medical guidelines as standard care: a comparative study of obstetric interventions and outcomes. Birth 2011, 38:120-128. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00461.x, 21599734.
31. Pavlova M, Hendrix M, Nouwens E, Nijhuis J, van MG. The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: implications for policy and management. Health Policy 2009, 93:27-34. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.05.008, 19540012.
32. Scotland GS, McNamee P, Cheyne H, Hundley V, Barnett C. Women's preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment. Birth 2011, 38:36-46. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00447.x, 21332773.