Compositionality in Software Product Lines

Emerging Methods, Technologies, and Process Management in Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 21-42

  Prehofer, Christian ^a   Van Gurp, Jilles ^a   Bosch, Jan ^b  

^a NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Intuit Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Compositional product family approach; Implicit dependencies; Integration oriented platform approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889806872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470238103.ch2     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. J.-J. Amor-Iglesias, J. M. González-Barahona, G. Robles-Martínez, and I. Herráiz-Tabernero. Measuring Libre software using Debian 3.1 (Sarge) as a case study: Preliminary results. UPGRADE: European Journal for the Informatics Professionals 6(3), 13-16, 2005.
2. L. Bass, P. Clements, S. Cohen, L. Northrop, and J. Withey. Product Line Practice Workshop Report, Technical Report CMU/SEI-97-TR-003, Software Engineering Institute, June 1997.
3. J. Bosch. Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product Line Approach. Pearson Education (Addison-Wesley & ACM Press), Reading, MA, 2000.
4. J. Bosch. Maturity and evolution in software product lines: Approaches, artefacts and organization. In Proceedings of the Second Conference Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2), pages 257-271, 2002.
5. J. Bosch. Expanding the scope of software product families: Problems and alternative approaches. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Quality of Software Architectures (QoSA 2006), LNCS 4214, page 1, Springer, 4.
6. M. Calder, M. Kolberg, E. H. Magill, and S. Reiff-Marganiec. Feature interaction: A critical review and considered forecast. Computer Networks. 41(1), 115-141, 2003.
7. D. Dikel, D. Kane, S. Ornburn, W. Loftus, and J. Wilson. Applying software product-line architecture. IEEE Computer 30(8), 49-55, 1997.
8. J. van Gurp. OSS Product Family Engineering. First International Workshop on Open Source Software and Product Lines at SPLC 2006. Available from www.sei.cmu.edu/splc 2006/
9. J. van Gurp, R. Smedinga, and J. Bosch. Architectural design support for composition and superimposition. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35 2002), page 287, 2002.
10. IEEE Std P1471-2000. Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software- Intensive Systems. IEEE, New York, 2000.
11. T. Kim, Y. T. Song, L. Chung, and D. T. Huynh. Dynamic software architecture slicing. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'99), pages 61-66, 1999.
12. R. R. Macala, L. D. Stuckey Jr., and D. C. Gross. Managing domain-specific product-line development. IEEE Software 13(3), 57-67, 1996.
13. R. van Ommering. Building product populations with software components. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 255-265, 2002.
14. R. van Ommering and J. Bosch. Widening the scope of software product lines-From variation to composition. In Proceedings of the 2nd Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2), pages 328-347, 2002.
15. W. Pree and K. Koskimies. Framelets-small and loosely coupled frameworks, ACM Computing Surveys 32(1):6, 4.
16. C. Prehofer. Feature-oriented programming: A new way of object composition. Concurrency and Computation 13(6), 465-501, 2001.
17. E. S. Raymond. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA, 1999.
18. M. Stal. Web services: Beyond component-based computing. Communications of the ACM 45(10), 71-76, 2002.
19. C. Szyperski. Component Software-Beyond Object Oriented Programming. Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.
20. D. Wheeler. More than a Gigabuck: Estimating GNU/Linux's Size, www.dwheeler.com/sloc/redhat71-v1/redhat71sloc.html, 2002.