Risk factors for classical hysterotomy by gestational age

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 122, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 845-850

  Osmundson, Sarah S ^a,b   Garabedian, Matthew J ^a,b   Lyell, Deirdre J ^a,b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DELIVERY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYSTEROTOMY; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALPRESENTATION; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIPARA; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK FACTOR; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; HYSTEROTOMY; LOGISTIC MODELS; PREGNANCY; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84889805718     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a39731     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bakhshi T, Landon MB, Lai Y, Spong CY, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of repeat cesarean delivery in women with a prior classical versus low transverse uterine incision. Am J Perinatol 2010;27:791-6.
2. Shah YG, Ronner W, Eckl CJ, Stinson SK. Acute maternal morbidity following classical cesarean delivery of the preterm infant. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:16-9.
3. Blanco JD, Gibbs RS. Infections following classical cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:167-9.
4. Lao TT, Halpern SH, Crosby ET, Huh C. Uterine incision and maternal blood loss in preterm caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1993;252:113-7.
5. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-9.
6. Halperin ME, Moore DC, Hannah WJ. Classical versus lowsegment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:990-6.
7. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:323-33.
8. Greene RA, Fitzpatrick C, Turner MJ. What are the maternal implications of a classical caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;18:345-7.
9. Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, Lai Y, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009;360:111-20.
10. Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J 1999;3:225-31.
11. Greenland S, Rothman KJ. Introduction to stratified analysis. In:Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott- Raven Publishers; 1998. p. 253-79.
12. MacDorman MF, Declercq E, Zhang J. Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006. Am J Public Health 2010;100:2241-7.
13. Stoll BJ, Hansen NIN, Bell EF, Shankaran SS, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010;126:443-56.
14. Malloy MH. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000- 2003. Pediatrics 2008;122:285-92.
15. Lee HC, Gould JB. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriatefor- gestational-age status. Pediatrics 2006;118:e1836-44.
16. Bethune MM, Permezel MM. The relationship between gestational age and the incidence of classical caesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;37:153-5.
17. Keeping JD, Morrison JJ, Chang AM. Classical caesarean section in preterm deliveries. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;20: 103-5.
18. Haesslein HC, Goodlin RC. Delivery of the tiny newborn. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;134:192-200.