Unethical practices in anesthetic research and publication: Clinical impact, consequences and preventive measures

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 491-492

  Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Singh ^a  

^a GIAN SAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HUMAN; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 84889765359     PISSN: 1658354X     EISSN: 09753125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.121073     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Shamim T. Serious thoughts about plagiarism from India. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:191.
2. Eldawlatly A, Shafer SL. Caveat lector. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:99-101.
3. Bithal PK. Ethics in medical writing. Anesth Essays Res 2012;6:113-4.
4. Harsoor SS, Gangadhar SB. Fraud in anaesthetic research and publication. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:1-3.
5. Boldt J, Suttner S, Brosch C, Lehmann A, Röhm K, Mengistu A. Cardiopulmonary bypass priming using a high dose of a balanced hydroxyethyl starch versus an albumin-based priming strategy. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1752-62.
6. Kranke P, Apfel CC, Roewer N, Fujii Y. Reported data on granisetron and postoperative nausea and vomiting by et al. Are incredibly nice! Anesth Analg 2000;90:1004-7.
7. R euben SS, Connelly NR. Postoperative analgesic effects of celecoxib or rofecoxib after spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1221-5.