The SAMMIE Corpus of Multimodal Dialogues with an MP3 Player

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 2018-2023

  Kruijff Korbayová, Ivana ^a   Becker, Tilman ^b   Blaylock, Nate ^a   Gerstenberger, Ciprian ^a   Kaißer, Michael ^b   Poller, Peter ^b   Rieser, Verena ^a   Schehl, Jan ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERACTION STRATEGY; LOG FILE; MP-3 PLAYERS; MULTI-MODAL; MULTIMODAL DIALOGUE; NITE XML TOOLKIT; RICH FEATURES; WIZARD OF OZ;

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

EID: 84889711699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. N. Blaylock, B. Fromkorth, C. Gerstenberger, I. Kruijff-Korbayová (ed.), O. Lemon, P. Manchón, A. Moos, V. Rieser, C. del Solar, and K. Weilhammer. 2006. Annotators handbook. Deliverable D6.2, TALK Project.
2. H. Bunt. 2005. A framework for dialogue act specification. Paper presented at the Joint ISO TC 37/SC 4/TDG 3 and ACL-SIGSEM WG Workshop on the Representation of Multimodal Semantic Information, Tilburg, January 2005.
3. J. Carletta, A. Isard, S. Isard, J. C. Kowtko, G. Doherty-Sneddon, and A. H. Anderson. 1997. The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Linguistic, 1(23):13-31.
4. J. Carletta, S. Evert, U. Heid, J. Kilgour, J. Robertson, and H. Voormann. 2003. The NITE XML Toolkit: flexible annotation for multi-modal language data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, special issue on Measuring Behavior. Submitted.
5. H. Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
6. M. Core and J. Allen. 1997. Coding dialogs with the damsl annotation scheme. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, pages 28-35, Boston, MA, November.
7. T. Höhle. 1983. Topologische Felder. University of Cologne.
8. P. Jordan and M. Walker. 2005. Learning Content Selection Rules for Generating Object Descriptions in Dialogue. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 24:157-194.
9. I. Kruijff-Korbayová, T. Becker, N. Blaylock, C. Gerstenberger, M. Kaißer, P. Poller, J. Schehl, and V. Rieser. 2005. An experiment setup for collecting data for adaptive output planning in a multimodal dialogue system. In Proc. of ENLG, pages 191-196.
10. C. Lauer, J. Frey, B. Lang, T. Becker, T. Kleinbauer, and J. Alexandersson. 2005. Amigram - a generalpurpose tool for multimodal corpus annotation. In Proc. of MLMI.
11. D. L. Martin, A. J. Cheyer, and D. B. Moran. 1999. The open agent architecture: A framework for building distributed software systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, 13(1-2):91-128.
12. S. Mattes. 2003. The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In Proc. of IGfA.
13. M. Poesio. 2000. Annotating a Corpus to Develop and Evaluate Discourse Entity Realization Algorithms: Issues and Preliminary Results. In Proc. of LREC, pages 211-218, Athens, May/June.
14. M. Poesio. 2004. The MATE/GNOME Scheme for Anaphoric Annotation, Revisited. In Proc. of the SIG-DIAL, pages 154-162, Boston, April.
15. Verena Rieser, Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, and Oliver Lemon. 2005. A corpus collection and annotation framework for learning multimodal clarification strategies. In Proc. of SIGdial6-2005, pages 97-106.
16. D. R. Traum and E. A. Hinkelman. 1992. Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Computational Intelligence, 8(3):575-599. Also available as University of Rochester Department of Computer Science Technical Report 425.
17. D. Traum and S. Larsson. 2003. The information state approach to dialogue management. In Current and New Directions in Discourse & Dialogue. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. M. Walker and R. Passoneau. 2001. DATE: A dialogue act tagging scheme for evaluation. In Human Language Technology Conference, pages 1-8.
19. M. Walker, D. Litman, C. Kamm, and A. Abella. 1997. Paradise: a general framework for evaluating spoken dialogue agents. In Proc. of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL/EACL, pages 271-280.