Sustainable forest management in a Mediterranean region: Social preferences

Forest Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 546-558

  Maroto, C ^a   Segura, M ^a   Ginestar, C ^a   Uriol, J ^a   Segura, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Goal programming; Multiple criteria decision making; Preferences aggregation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889686200     PISSN: 21715068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2013223-04135     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ananda J, Herath G, 2003a. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 45: 75-90.
2. Ananda J, Herath G, 2003b. The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics 5: 13-26.
3. Ananda J, 2007. Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning. Environmental Management 39: 534-544.
4. Ananda J, Herath G, 2008. Multi-attribute preference modelling and regional land use planning. Ecological Economics 65: 325-335.
5. Ananda J, Herath G, 2009. A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics 68: 2535-2548.
6. Belton V, Stewart TJ, 2003. Multiple criteria decision analysis - An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 372 pp.
7. Díaz-Balteiro L, Romero C, 2008. Making forestry decision with multiple criteria: a review and assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 3222-3241.
8. Díaz-Balteiro L, González-Pachón J, Romero C, 2009. Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: an application to two public forests in Spain. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24: 87-93.
9. FORSYS, 2011. Forest management decision support systems [on line]. Available in http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Participatory_processes [September, 2011].
10. González-Pachón J, Romero C, 2004. A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research 158(2): 351-361.
11. González-Pachón J, Romero C, 2007. Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices without suitable properties. Annals of Operational Research 154(1): 123-132.
12. Hiltunen V, Kurttila M, Leskinen P, Pasanen K, Pykä-läinen J, 2009. Mesta: an internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning. Forest Policy and Economics 11: 1-9.
13. Hjortsø CN, 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR -- an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. European Journal of Operational Research 152: 667-683.
14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Climate Change 2007, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers. www. ipcc.ch.
15. Kangas J, Kangas A, 2005. Multiple criteria decision support in forest management - the approach, methods applied and experiences gained. Forest Ecology and Management 207: 133-143.
16. Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M, 2008. Decision Support for Forest Management, Springer. 222 pp.
17. Kangas A, Saarinen N, Saarikoski H, Leskinen LA, Hujala, T, Tikkanen J, 2010. Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 213-222.
18. Kazana V, Fawcett R, Mutch W, 2003. A decision support modelling framework for multiple use forest management: the Queen Elizabeth Forest case study in Scotland. European Journal of Operational Research 148: 1002-1115.
19. Martell DL, Gunn EA, Weintraub A, 1998. Forest management challenges for operational researchers. European Journal of Operational Research 104: 1-17.
20. Mendoza GA, Martins H, 2006. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management 230: 1-22.
21. Nordström EM, Romero C, Eriksson LO, Öhman K, 2009. Aggregation of preferences in participatory forest planning with multiple criteria: an application to the urban forest in Lycksele, Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39: 1979-1992.
22. Nordström EM, Eriksson LO, Öhman K. 2010. Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 12, 562-574.
23. PATFOR, 2011. Plan de acción territorial forestal de la comunitat valenciana, Generalitat Valenciana [on line]. Available in http://www.cma.gva.es/web/indice.aspx? nodo=72266&idioma=C [May, 2011].
24. Petrokofsky G, Brown ND, Heremy GE, 2010. A participatory process for identifying and prioritizing policy-relevant research questions in natural resource management: a case study from the UK forestry sector. Forestry 83(4): 357-367.
25. Saaty TL, 2006. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA. 478 pp.
26. Saaty TL, 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int J Services Sciences 1(1): 83-98.
27. Saaty TL, Peniwati K, 2008. Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RW S Publications, Pittsburgh, USA. 385 pp.
28. Saaty TL, Shih H, 2009. Structures in decision making: on the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. European Journal of Operational Research 199: 867-872.
29. Schmoldt DL, Mendoza GA, Kangas J (ed), 2001. Past developments and future directions for the AHP in natural resources. The analytic hierarchy process in natural re-source and environmental decision making. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp: 289-305.
30. Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M, 2005. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207(1-2): 171-187.
31. SuperDecisions, 2010. http://www.superdecisions.com/ [October 2010].
32. XU Z, 2000. On consistency of weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 126: 683-687.