Endotracheal intubation with the GlideScope®, the Airtraq®, the McGrath® videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy: A comparative study on an infant manikin

Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 844-849

  Orliaguet, G A ^a   Blot, R M ^a   Bourdaud, N ^a   Egan, M ^a   Dogaru, E ^a   Salvi, N ^a   Gall, O ^a   Carli, P ^a  

^a HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

Author keywords

Children; Manikin; Tracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION GUIDE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGOSCOPY; PEDIATRICS; TREATMENT FAILURE; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENFANT; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INFANT; INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; MANNEQUIN; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDÉO-LARYNGOSCOPE;

CHILDREN; ENFANT; INTUBATION; MANIKIN; MANNEQUIN; TRACHEAL INTUBATION; VIDÉO-LARYNGOSCOPE; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INFANT; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MANIKINS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84889679672     PISSN: 07507658     EISSN: 17696623     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Rolf N., Cote C.J. Frequency and severity of desaturation events during general anesthesia in children with and without upper respiratory infections. J Clin Anesth 1992, 4:200-203.
2. Dupeyrat A., Dubreuil M., Ecoffey C. Preoxygenation in children. Anesth Analg 1994, 79:1027.
3. Xue F.S., Luo L.K., Tong S.Y., Liao X., Deng X.M., An G. Study of the safe threshold of apneic period in children during anesthesia induction. J Clin Anesth 1996, 8:568-574.
4. Vlatten A., Aucoin S., Litz S., MacManus B., Soder C. A comparison of bonfils fiberscope-assisted laryngoscopy and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated difficult pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Paediatr Anaesth 2010, 20:559-565.
5. White M., Weale N., Nolan J., Sale S., Bayley G. Comparison of the Cobalt Glidescope video-laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in simulated normal and difficult infant airways. Paediatr Anaesth 2009, 19:1108-1112.
6. Kim J.T., Na H.S., Bae J.Y., Kim D.W., Kim H.S., Kim C.S., et al. GlideScope video-laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2008, 101:531-534.
7. Sola C., Delous E., Raux O., Capdevila X., Dadure C. GlideScope(R) Cobalt with disposable blades: series of 121intubations in young children. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2011, 30:447-448.
8. Fiadjoe J.E., Gurnaney H., Dalesio N., Sussman E., Zhao H., Zhang X., et al. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt(R) video-laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology 2012, 116:622-628.
9. White M.C., Marsh C.J., Beringer R.M., Nolan J.A., Choi A.Y., Medlock K.E., et al. A randomised, controlled trial comparing the Airtraq optical laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in infants and children. Anaesthesia 2012, 67:226-231.
10. Riad W., Moussa A., Wong D.T. Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the pediatric population. Saudi J Anaesth 2012, 6:332-335.
11. Videira R.L., Neto P.P., do Amaral R.V., Freeman J.A. Preoxygenation in children: for how long?. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992, 36:109-111.
12. Woollard M., Lighton D., Mannion W., Watt J., McCrea C., Johns I., et al. Airtraq vs standard laryngoscopy by student paramedics and experienced prehospital laryngoscopists managing a model of difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2008, 63:26-31.
13. ® videolaryngoscope in children younger than two years - a randomized pilot-study. BMC Anesthesiol 2012, 12:7.
14. Armstrong J., John J., Karsli C. A comparison between the GlideScope Video-laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways - a pilot study. Anaesthesia 2010, 65:353-357.
15. Griesdale D.E., Liu D., McKinney J., Choi P.T. Glidescope(R) video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2012, 59:41-52.
16. Healy D.W., Maties O., Hovord D., Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol 2012, 12:32.
17. Taylor A.M., Peck M., Launcelott S., Hung O.R., Law J.A., MacQuarrie K., et al. The McGrath(R) Series 5videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2013, 68:142-147.
18. Baciarello M., Zasa M., Manferdini M.E., Tosi M., Berti M., Fanelli G. The learning curve for laryngoscopy: Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscopes. J Anesth 2012, 26:516-524.
19. Powell L., Andrzejowski J., Taylor R., Turnbull D. Comparison of the performance of four laryngoscopes in a high-fidelity simulator using normal and difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103:755-760.
20. Lees M., Seal R.F., Spady D., Csanyi-Fritz Y., Robinson J.L. Randomized trial of success of pediatric anesthesiologists learning to use two video-laryngoscopes. Paediatr Anaesth 2013, 23:435-439.
21. ® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by advanced paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation. BMC Emerg Med 2009, 9:9.
22. Di Marco P., Scattoni L., Spinoglio A., Luzi M., Canneti A., Pietropaoli P., et al. Learning curves of the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation by novice laryngoscopists: a clinical study. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:122-125.
23. Savoldelli G.L., Schiffer E., Abegg C., Baeriswyl V., Clergue F., Waeber J.L. Learning curves of the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009, 26:554-558.
24. Wetsch W.A., Carlitscheck M., Spelten O., Teschendorf P., Hellmich M., Genzwurker H.V., et al. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video-laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011, 28:849-858.
25. Rai M.R., Popat M.T. Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin?. Anaesthesia 2011, 66:1-3.
26. Howes B.W., Wharton N.M., Gibbison B., Cook T.M. LMA Supreme insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia 2010, 65:343-347.
27. Hesselfeldt R., Kristensen M.S., Rasmussen L.S. Evaluation of the airway of the SimMan full-scale patient simulator. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005, 49:1339-1345.
28. Cook T.M., Green C., McGrath J., Srivastava R. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of single use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:713-718.
29. Jordan G.M., Silsby J., Bayley G., Cook T.M., Difficult Airway S. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:708-712.
30. Silsby J., Jordan G., Bayley G., Cook T.M. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as simulators for inserting the LMA Classic*. Anaesthesia 2006, 61:576-579.
31. Jackson K.M., Cook T.M. Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia 2007, 62:388-393.