Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: A quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2013, Pages

  Montori, Victor M ^a   Leblanc, Annie ^a   Buchholz, Angela ^b   Stilwell, Diana L ^c   Tsapas, Apostolos ^d  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c Informed Medical Decisions Foundation   (United States)

^d ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

EID: 84889673693     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S5     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Beauchamp T, Childress J, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009
2. Editorial: renewing professionalism in medicine: the physician charter. Brennan TA, Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 27 2087 10.1097/00007632-200210010-00002 12394918
3. Through the patient's eyes. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco T, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1993
4. Progress in evidence-based medicine. Montori VM, Guyatt GH, JAMA 2008 300 1814 1816 10.1001/jama.300.15.1814 18854545
5. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, BMJ 2008 336 924 926 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD 18436948 (Pubitemid 351632017)
6. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence - study limitations (risk of bias). Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl EA, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y, Norris SL, Williams JW Jr., Atkins D, Meerpohl J, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 407 415 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 21247734
7. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence - publication bias. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams JW Jr., Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 1277 1282 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2011.01.011 21802904
8. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Akl EA, Norris S, Vist G, Dahm P, Shukla VK, Higgins J, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 1294 1302 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017 21803546
9. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence - imprecision. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Freyschuss B, Vist G, Jaeschke R, Williams JW Jr., Murad MH, Sinclair D, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Whittington C, Thorlund K, Andrews J, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 1283 1293 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 21839614
10. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Falck-Ytter Y, Jaeschke R, Vist G, Akl EA, Post PN, Norris S, Meerpohl J, Shukla VK, Nasser M, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 1303 1310 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014 21802903
11. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 1311 1316 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004 21802902
12. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M, J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 1013 1020 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009 19230606
13. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Hanna SE, Littlejohns P, Makarski J, Zitzelsberger L, CMAJ 2010 182 839 842 10.1503/cmaj.090449 20603348
14. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH, BMJ 2010 340 117 10.1136/bmj.c117 20354011
15. Getting the methods right - the foundation of patient-centered outcomes research. Gabriel SE, Normand SL, N Engl J Med 2012 367 787 790 10.1056/NEJMp1207437 22830434
16. How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D, Ann Intern Med 2007 147 224 233 10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00179 17638714 (Pubitemid 351664578)
17. Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects. Spencer FA, Iorio A, You J, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ, Vandvik PO, Crowther MA, Pottie K, Lang ES, Meerpohl JJ, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH, BMJ 2012 345 7401 10.1136/bmj.e7401 23152569
18. Cardiovascular risk assessment scores for people with diabetes: a systematic review. Chamnan P, Simmons RK, Sharp SJ, Griffin SJ, Wareham NJ, Diabetologia 2009 52 2001 2014 10.1007/s00125-009-1454-0 19629430
19. A systematic review of information in decision aids. Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S, McIssac K, Austoker J, Charvet A, Hewitson P, Sepucha KR, Whelan T, Health Expect 2007 10 46 61 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00420.x 17324194
20. Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: A randomized trial. Akl EA, Maroun N, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Alonso-Coello P, Vist GE, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 1298 1305 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.011 17998085 (Pubitemid 350061142)
21. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Akl EA, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ, J Clin Epidemiol 2013 66 151 157 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01. 006 22542023
22. Clinician's use of the Statin Choice decision aid in patients with diabetes: a videographic study nested in a randomized trial. Abadie R, Weymiller AJ, Tilburt J, Shah ND, Charles C, Gafni A, Montori VM, J Eval Clin Pract 2009 15 492 497 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01048.x 19366386