'Tell me what you think about the geological storage of carbon dioxide': Towards a fuller understanding of public perceptions of CCS

Energy Procedia

Volumn 37, Issue , 2013, Pages 7444-7453

  Mabon, Leslie ^a   Vercelli, Samuela ^b   Shackley, Simon ^a   Anderlucci, Jonathan ^b   Battisti, Nadia ^c   Franzese, Carmela ^b   Boot, Kelvin ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d PLYMOUTH MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide capture and storage; Deliberation and engagement; Environmental values; Public perceptions; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889667199     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.687     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Feenstra CFJ, Mikunda T, Brunsting S. What happened in Barendrecht? Case study on the planned onshore carbon dioxide storage in Barendrecht, the Netherlands. Amsterdam: ECN/GCCSI; 2010.
2. Duetschke E. What drives local public acceptance? CoMParing two cases from Germany. Energy Procedia 2010;4:6234-40.
3. Ashworth P, Rodriguez S, Miller A. Case study of the CO2RC Otway project. Canberra: CSIRO/GCCSI; 2010.
4. Shackley S, Evar B. Public Understanding, Engagement and Communication Efforts on CCS: A Review for the IEA CCS Technology Roadmap. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2009.
5. Wynne B. Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science - Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? Community Genetics 2006:9(3):211-20.
6. Douglas M. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge; 1992.
7. Bielicki J, Stephens J. Public Perception of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology: Workshop Report. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University; 2008.
8. Starr C. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 1969:165(3899):1232-8.
9. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982.
10. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
11. Benedict R. Patterns of Culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin; 1934.
12. Farr RM, Moscovici S. Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
13. Markusson N, Shackley S, Evar B. The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage. London: Earthscan; 2012.
14. Gardiner S, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 2010.
15. Howell R, Shackley S, Mabon L. Public perceptions of low carbon energy technologies: Results from a Scottish Large Group Process. Canberra: Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute; 2012.
16. Citizens of Moray. Carbon capture and storage: SiteChar positioning paper. Amsterdam: ECN; 2012.
17. Potter J. Contemporary discursive psychology: Issues, prospects, and Cororan's awkward ontology. British Journal of Social Psychology 2010:49: 657-78.
18. Salvatore S, Venuleo C. Understanding the role of emotion in sensemaking. A semiotic psychoanalytic oriented perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science 2008:42(1):32-46.
19. Carli R, Paniccia RM. Analisi della domanda: Teoria e intervento in psicologia clinica [Demand analysis: Theory and intervention in clinical psychology]. Bologna: Il Mulino; 2003.
20. Dolcetti FR, Battisti N, Casaccio F. Costruire testo: Analisi di un processo di formazione all'intervista in psicologia [Text construction: Analysis of a training process to interview in psychology]. In Heiden S, Pincemin B, editors. JADT 2008. Actes des 9es journees internationales d 'analyse statistique des données textuelles Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon; 2008, p.409-20.