Rethinking policy-related research: Charting a path using qualitative comparative analysis and complexity theory

Contemporary Social Science

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 333-345

  Blackman, Tim ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

complexity theory; evidence based policy; qualitative comparative analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889666275     PISSN: 21582041     EISSN: 2158205X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.751500     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahmed, N., Bourton, I., Dechartres, A., Durieux, P., & Ravaud, P. (2010). Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: A systematic review. Trials, 11(1), 20 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-20
2. Befani, B., Ledermann, S., & Sager, F. (2007). Realistic evaluation and QCA: Conceptual parallels and an empirical application. Evaluation, 13(2), 171-192. doi: 10.1177/1356389007075222
3. Blackman, T. (2006). Placing health, Bristol: Policy Press.
4. Blackman, T., Wistow, J., & Byrne, D. (2011). A qualitative comparative analysis of factors associated with trends in narrowing health inequalities in England. Social Science & Medicine, 72(12), 1965-1974. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.003
5. Brousselle, A., & Lessard, C. (2011). Economic evaluation to inform health care decision-making: Promise, pitfalls and a proposal for an alternative path. Social Science & Medicine, 72(6), 832-839. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.008
6. Bunge, M. (2004). How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 182-210. doi: 10.1177/0048393103262550
7. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences, London: Routledge.
8. Byrne, D. (2011). Applying social science, Bristol: Policy Press.
9. Byrne, D., & Ragin, C. (2009). The SAGE handbook of case-based methods, London: Sage.
10. Cartwright, N. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties, 2(1), 11-20. doi: 10.1017/S1745855207005029
11. Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. W. (2009). Sociology and complexity science: A new field of inquiry, Berlin: Springer.
12. Chapman, J. (2004). System failure: Why governments must learn to think differently, London: Demos.
13. Cilliers, P. (1988). Complexity and postmodernism, London: Routledge.
14. Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2010). Contrasting variable-analytic and case-based approaches to the analysis of survey datasets: Exploring how achievement varies by ability across configurations of social class and sex. Methodological Innovations Online, 5(1), 4-23.
15. Coote, A., Allen, J., & Woodhead, D. (2004). Finding out what works: Understanding complex, community-based initiatives, London: King's Fund.
16. Eve, R., Horsfall, S., & Lee, M. (1997). Chaos, complexity, and sociology: Myths, models, and theories, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
17. Exworthy, M., Bindman, A., Davies, H., & Washington, E. A. (2006). Evidence into policy and practice? Measuring the progress of U.S. and U.K. policies to tackle disparities and inequalities in U.S. and U.K. health and health care. The Milbank Quarterly, 84(1), 75-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00439.x
18. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and discursive practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180-1198. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586092
20. Flitcroft, K., Gillespie, J., Salkeld, G., Carter, S., & Trevena, L. (2011). Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies? Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1039-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.034
21. Graham, H. (2004). Tackling inequalities in health in England: Remedying health disadvantages, narrowing health gaps or reducing health gradients. Journal of Social Policy, 33(1), 115-131. doi: 10.1017/S0047279403007220
22. Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101-18.
23. Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
24. Hoddinott, P., Britten, J., & Pill, R. (2010). Why do interventions work in some places and not others: A breastfeeding support group trial. Social Science & Medicine, 70(5), 769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.067
25. Järvinen, T. L.N., Sievänen, H., Kannus, P., Jokihaara, J., & Khan, K. M. (2011). The true cost of pharmacological disease prevention. British Medical Journal, 342, d2175 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2175
26. Kellogg Foundation (2004). Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action: Logic model development guide, Battle Creek: Kellogg Foundation.
27. Kelly, M. P. (2010). The axes of social differentiation and the evidence base on health equity. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103(7), 266-272. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.100005
28. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies, New York: Addison-Wesley.
29. Liebovitch, L. S., & Scheurle, D. (2000). Two lessons from fractals and chaos. Complexity, 5(4), 34-43. doi: 10.1002/1099-0526(200003/04)5:4<34::AID-CPLX5>3.0.CO;2-3
30. Macintyre, S., Maciver, S., & Sooman, A. (1993). Area, class and health: Should we be focusing on places or people? Journal of Social Policy, 22(2), 213-234. doi: 10.1017/S0047279400019310
31. Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process, New Haven: Yale University Press.
32. Maryon-Davis, A., & Jolley, R. (2010). Healthy nudges - When the public wants change and politicians don't know it, London: Faculty of Public Health.
33. Meadows, D. H. (2009). Thinking in systems: A primer, London: Earthscan.
34. National Cancer Action Team (2010). Reducing cancer inequality: Evidence, progress and making it happen, London: Department of Health.
35. Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services, Bristol: Policy Press.
36. Oliver, A., & McDaid, D. (2002). Evidence-based health care: Benefits and barriers. Social Policy & Society, 1(3), 183-190. doi: 10.1017/S1474746402003020
37. Ormerod, P. (2010). N squared: Public policy and the power of networks, London: Royal Society of Arts.
38. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation, London: Sage.
39. Petticrew, M., Tugwell, P., Welch, V., Ueffing, E., Kristjansson, E., Armstrong, R., & Waters, E. (2009). Cochrane update: Better evidence about wicked issues in tackling health inequities. Journal of Public Health, 31(3), 453-56. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp076
40. Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Rihoux, B., Rezsöhazy, I., & Bol, D. (2011). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in public policy analysis: An extensive review. German Policy Studies, 7(3), 9-82.
42. de Savigny, D., & Adam, T. (2009). Systems thinking for health systems strengthening, Geneva: World Health Organization.
43. Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies, New York: Basic Books.
44. Seddon, J. (2005). Freedom from command and control: A better way to make the work work, Buckingham: Vanguard Education.
45. Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: An ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237-256. doi: 10.1017/S0047279410000723
46. Tett, G. (2009, March 10). Lost through destructive creation. Financial Times, p. 11
47. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Lin, K.-H. (2011). Income dynamics, economic rents, and the financialization of the U.S. economy. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 538-559. doi: 10.1177/0003122411414827
48. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.