BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes: Setting boundaries in development and defense

Plant Science

Volumn 215-216, Issue , 2014, Pages 157-171

  Khan, Madiha ^a   Xu, Huasong ^a   Hepworth, Shelley R ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abscission; BLADE ON PETIOLE; BTB ankryin; Defense; Development; Lateral organ boundaries

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; EMBRYOPHYTA; PHYLLANTHUS (ANGIOSPERM);

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; BOP1 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS;

ABSCISSION; BLADE-ON-PETIOLE; BTB-ANKRYIN; DEFENSE; DEVELOPMENT; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES; MERISTEM; METABOLISM; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENE; REVIEW;

ABSCISSION; BLADE-ON-PETIOLE; BTB-ANKRYIN; DEFENSE; DEVELOPMENT; LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; MERISTEM; PLANT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84889663848     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.019     Document Type: Review

References (166)

1. Cao H., Bowling S.A., Gordon S., Dong X. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1583-1592.
2. Fu Z.Q., Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64:839-863.
3. Fu Z.Q., et al. NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature 2012, 486:228-232.
4. Canet J.V., Dobón A., Roig A., Tornero P. Structure-function analysis of npr1 alleles in Arabidopsis reveals a role for its paralogs in the perception of salicylic acid. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33:1911-1922.
5. Ha C.M., et al. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 gene controls leaf pattern through the modulation of meristematic activity. Development 2003, 130:161-172.
6. Ha C.M., Jun J.H., Nam H.G., Fletcher J.C. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 encodes a BTB/POZ domain protein required for leaf morphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45:1361-1370.
7. Norberg M., Holm M., Nilsson O. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes act redundantly to control the growth and development of lateral organs. Development 2005, 132:2203-2213.
8. Hepworth S.R., Zhang Y., McKim S., Li X., Haughn G.W. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE-dependent signaling controls leaf and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:1434-1448.
9. Phytozome database, (accessed 30.06.13). http://www.phytozome.net/.
10. Lewis L.A., McCourt R.M. Green algae and the origin of land plants. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91:1535-1556.
11. Saleh O., et al. MicroRNA534a control of BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 mediates juvenile-to-adult gametophyte transition in Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2011, 65:661-674.
12. Prigge M.J., Bezanilla M. Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: Physcomitrella patens. Development 2010, 137:3535-3543.
13. Xu M., et al. Arabidopsis BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 promote floral meristem fate and determinacy in a previously undiscovered pathway targeting APETALA1 and AGAMOUS-LIKE24. Plant J. 2010, 63:974-989.
14. Yaxley J.L., Jablonski W., Reid J.B. Leaf and flower development in pea (Pisum sativum L.): mutants cochleata and unifoliata. Ann. Bot. 2001, 88:225-234.
15. Aida M., Tasaka M. Genetic control of shoot organ boundaries. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9:72-77.
16. Rast M.I., Simon R. The meristem-to-organ boundary: more than an extremity of anything. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2008, 18:287-294.
17. Takeda S., Aida M. Establishment of the embryonic shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Res. 2011, 124:211-219.
18. Khan M., et al. Antagonistic interaction of BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 with BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE regulates Arabidopsis inflorescence architecture. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:946-960.
19. Spinelli S.V., Martin A.P., Viola I.L., Gonzalez D.H., Palatnik J.F. A mechanistic link between STM and CUC1 during Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:1894-1904.
20. Jun J.H., Ha C.M., Fletcher J.C. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 coordinates organ determinacy and axial polarity in Arabidopsis by directly activating ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2. Plant Cell 2010, 22:62-76.
21. McKim S.M., et al. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes are essential for abscission zone formation in Arabidopsis. Development 2008, 135:1537-1546.
22. Ha C.M., Jun J.H., Nam H.G., Fletcher J.C. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 control Arabidopsis lateral organ fate through regulation of LOB domain and adaxial-abaxial polarity genes. Plant Cell 2007, 19:1809-1825.
23. Hay A., Tsiantis M. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 2010, 137:3153-3156.
24. Champagne C., Sinha N. Compound leaves: equal to the sum of their parts. Development 2004, 131:4401-4412.
25. Efroni I., Eshed Y., Lifschitz E. Morphogenesis of simple and compound leaves: a critical review. Plant Cell 2010, 22:1019-1032.
26. Zoulias N., Koenig D., Hamidi A., McCormick S., Kim M. A role for PHANTASTICA in medio-lateral regulation of adaxial domain development in tomato and tobacco leaves. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109:407-418.
27. Belles-Boix E., et al. KNAT6: an Arabidopsis homeobox gene involved in meristem activity and organ separation. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1900-1907.
28. Blein T., et al. A conserved molecular framework for compound leaf development. Science 2008, 322:1835-1839.
29. Hamant O., Pautot V. Plant development: a TALE story. C. R. Biol. 2010, 333:371-381.
30. Ha C.M., Jun J.H., Fletcher J.C. Control of Arabidopsis leaf morphogenesis through regulation of the YABBY and KNOX families of transcription factors. Genetics 2010, 186:197-206.
31. Byrne M.E., et al. Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 2000, 408:967-971.
32. Ori N., Eshed Y., Chuck G., Bowman J.L., Hake S. Mechanisms that control knox gene expression in the Arabidopsis shoot. Development 2000, 127:5523-5532.
33. Guo M., Thomas J., Collins G., Timmermans M.C.P. Direct repression of KNOX loci by the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 complex of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20:48-58.
34. Lodha M., Marco C.F., Timmermans M.C. The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES complex maintains repression of KNOX homeodomain genes via direct recruitment of Polycomb-repressive complex2. Genes Dev. 2013, 27:596-601.
35. Semiarti E., et al. The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates formation of a symmetric lamina, establishment of venation and repression of meristem-related homeobox genes in leaves, Development 2001, 128:1771-1783.
36. Shani E., et al. Stage-specific regulation of Solanum lycopersicum leaf maturation by Class I KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX proteins. Plant Cell 2009, 21:3078-3092.
37. Shuai B., Reynaga-Peña C.G., Springer P.S. The LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES gene defines a novel, plant-specific gene family. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129:747-761.
38. Nakazawa N., et al. Activation tagging, a novel tool to dissect the functions of a gene family. Plant J. 2003, 34:741-750.
39. Chalfun-Junior A., et al. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2-LIKE1 gene, a members of the AS2/LOB family, controls proximal-distal patterning in Arabidopsis petals. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57:559-575.
40. Koyama T., Mitsuda N., Seki M., Shinozaki K., Ohme-Takagi M. TCP transcription factors regulate the activities of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and miR164, as well as the auxin response, during differentiation of leaves in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22:3574-3588.
41. Li Z., Sheen W.-H., Huang H., Dong A. TCP transcription factors interact with AS2 in the repression of class-I KNOX genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2012, 71:99-107.
42. Rast M.I., Simon R. Arabidopsis JAGGED LATERAL ORGANS acts with ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 to co-ordinate KNOX and PIN expression in shoot and root meristems. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2917-2933.
43. Yamaguchi T., Nukazuki A., Tsukaya H. Leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity specification and lamina outgrowth: evolution and development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53:1180-1194.
44. Ichihashi Y., et al. Key proliferative activity in the junction between the leaf blade and leaf petiole of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:1151-1162.
45. Dinneny J.R., Yadegari R., Fischer R.L., Yanofsky M.F., Weigel D. The role of JAGGED in shaping lateral organs. Development 2004, 131:1101-1110.
46. Ohno C.K., Reddy G.V., Heisler M.G.B., Meyerowitz E.M. The Arabidopsis JAGGED gene encodes a zinc finger protein that promotes leaf tissue development. Development 2004, 131:1111-1122.
47. Dinneny J.R., Weigel D., Yanofsky M.F. NUBBIN and JAGGED define stamen and carpel shape in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133:1645-1655.
48. David-Schwartz R., Koenig D., Sinha N.R. LYRATE is a key regulator of leaflet initiation and lamina outgrowth in tomato. Plant Cell 2009, 21:3093-3104.
49. van der Graaff E., Dulk-Ras A.D., Hooykaas P.J.J., Keller B. Activation tagging of the LEAFY PETIOLE gene affects leaf petiole development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2000, 127:4971-4980.
50. Sarojam R., et al. Differentiating Arabidopsis shoots from leaves by combined YABBY activities. Plant Cell 2010, 22:2113-2130.
51. Ori N., et al. Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR139 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:787-791.
52. Efroni I., Blum E., Goldshmidt A., Eshed Y. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 2008, 20:2293-2306.
53. Palatnik J.F., et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003, 425:257-263.
54. Wang W., et al. YUCCA genes are expressed in response to leaf adaxial-abaxial juxtaposition and are required for leaf margin development. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:1805-1819.
55. Hofer J., et al. UNIFOLIATA regulates leaf and flower morphogenesis in pea. Curr. Biol. 1977, 7:581-587.
56. Gourlay W.W., Hofer J.M., Ellis T.H. Pea compound leaf architecture is regulated by interactions among the genes UNIFOLIATA, cochleata, afila, and tendril-less. Plant Cell 2000, 12:1279-1294.
57. Wang H., et al. Control of compound leaf development by FLORICAULA/LEAFY ortholog SINGLE LEAFLET1 in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 2008, 146:1759-1772.
58. Couzigou J.-M., et al. NODULE ROOT and COCHLEATA maintain nodule development and are legume orthologs of Arabidopsis BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes. Plant Cell 2012, 24:4498-4510.
59. Wellensiuk S.J. Neutronic mutations in peas. Euphytica 1959, 8:209-215.
60. Kumar S., Mishra R.K., Kumar A., Srivastava S., Chaudhary S. Regulation of stipule development by COCHLEATA and STIPULE-REDUCED genes in pea Pisum sativum. Planta 2009, 230:449-458.
61. Sharma V., Chaudhary S., Kumar A., Kumar S. COCHLEATA controls leaf size and secondary inflorescence architecture via negative regulation of UNIFOLIATA (LEAFY ortholog) gene in garden pea Pisum sativum. J. Biosci. 2012, 37:1041-1059.
62. Schultz E.A., Haughn G.W. LEAFY, a homeotic gene that regulates inflorescence development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1991, 3:771-781.
63. Blázquez M.A., Ferrándiz C., Madueño F., Parcy F. How floral meristems are built. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60:855-870.
64. Liu C., Thong Z., Yu H. Coming into bloom: the specification of floral meristems. Development 2009, 136:3379-3391.
65. Hepworth S.R., Klenz J.E., Haughn G.W. UFO in the Arabidopsis inflorescence apex is required for floral-meristem identity and bract suppression. Planta 2006, 223:769-778.
66. Hempel F.D., et al. Floral determination and expression of floral regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. Development 1997, 124:3845-3853.
67. Chahtane H., et al. A variant of LEAFY reveals its capacity to stimulate meristem development by inducing RAX1. Plant J. 2013, 74:678-689.
68. Karim M.R., Hirota A., Kwiatkowska D., Tasaka M., Aida M. A role for Arabidopsis PUCHI in floral meristem identity and bract suppression. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1360-1372.
69. Benlloch R., et al. Integrating long-day flowering signals: a LEAFY binding site is essential for proper photoperiodic activation of APETALA1. Plant J. 2011, 67:1094-1102.
70. Wigge P.A. FT, a mobile developmental signal in plants. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:R374-R378.
71. Wang J.-W., Czech B., Weigel D. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis. Cell 2009, 138:738-749.
72. Yamaguchi A., et al. The microRNA-regulated SBP-box transcription factor SPL3 is a direct upstream activator of LEAFY, FRUITFULL, and APETALA1. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:268-278.
73. Li S., et al. Nuclear activity of ROXY1, a glutaredoxin interacting with TGA factors, is required for petal development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21:429-441.
74. Maier A.T., et al. Dual roles of the bZIP transcription factor PERIANTHIA in the control of floral architecture and homeotic gene expression. Development 2009, 136:1613-1620.
75. Taylor S.A., et al. PROLIFERATING INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM, a MADS-box gene that regulates floral meristem identity in pea. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129:1150-1159.
76. (accessed 15.06.13). http://apps.carleton.edu/people/ssinger/research/.
77. Das P., et al. Floral stem cell termination involves the direct regulation of AGAMOUS by PERIANTHIA. Development 2009, 136:1605-1611.
78. Causier B., Schwarz-Sommer Z., Davies B. Floral organ identity: 20 years of ABCs. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 21:73-79.
79. Baum S.F., Eshed Y., Bowman J.L. The Arabidopsis nectary is an ABC-independent floral structure. Development 2001, 128:4657-4667.
80. Smyth D.R. Morphogenesis of flowers-our evolving view. Plant Cell 2005, 17:330-341.
81. Running M.P., Meyerowitz E.M. Mutations in the PERIANTHIA gene of Arabidopsis specifically alter floral organ number and initiation pattern. Development 1996, 122:1261-1269.
82. Kumar S., et al. Interaction between COCHLEATA and UNIFOLIATA genes enables normal floral morphogenesis in the garden pea, Pisum sativum. J. Genet. 2011, 90:309-314.
83. Wang Z., et al. Genetic control of floral zygomorphy in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:10414-10419.
84. Feng X., et al. Control of petal shape and floral zygomorphy in Lotus japonicas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:4970-4975.
85. Luo D., Carpenter R., Vincent C., Copsey L., Coen E. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 1996, 383:794-799.
86. Harder L.D., Prusinkiewicz P. The interplay between inflorescence development and function as the crucible of architectural diversity. Ann. Bot. 2012, 10.1093/aob/mcs252.
87. Smith H.M.S., Hake S. The interaction of two homeobox genes, BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE, regulates internode patterning in the Arabidopsis inflorescence. Plant Cell 2003, 15:1717-1727.
88. Smith H.M.S., Campbell B.C., Hake S. Competence to respond to floral inductive signals requires the homeobox genes PENNYWISE and POUNDFOOLISH. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:812-817.
89. Ehlting J., et al. Global transcript profiling of primary stems from Arabidopsis thaliana identifies candidate genes for missing links in lignin biosynthesis and transcriptional regulators of fibre differentiation. Plant J. 2005, 42:618-640.
90. Sanchez P., Nehlin L., Greb T. From thin to thick: major transitions during stem development. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17:113-121.
91. Khan M., Tabb P., Hepworth S.R. BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 regulate Arabidopsis inflorescence architecture in conjunction with homeobox genes KNAT6 and ATH1. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7:1-5.
92. Long J.A., Moan E.I., Medford J.I., Barton K.M. A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 1996, 379:66-69.
93. Lincoln C., Long J., Yamaguchi J., Serikawa K., Hake S. A knotted1-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1859-1876.
94. Rutjens B., et al. Shoot apical meristem function in Arabidopsis requires the combined activities of three BEL1-like homeodomain proteins. Plant J. 2009, 58:641-654.
95. Gómez-Mena C., Sablowski R. ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX GENE1 establishes the basal boundaries of shoot organs and controls stem growth. Plant Cell 2008, 20:2059-2072.
96. Byrne M.E., Groover A.T., Fontana J.R., Martienssen R.A. Phyllotactic pattern and stem cell fate are determined by the Arabidopsis homeobox gene BELLRINGER. Development 2003, 130:3941-3950.
97. Proveniers M., Rutjens B., Brand M., Smeekens S. The Arabidopsis TALE homeobox gene ATH1 controls floral competency through positive regulation of FLC. Plant J. 2007, 52:899-913.
98. Li Y., Pi L., Huang H., Xu L. ATH1 and KNAT2 proteins act together in regulation of inflorescence architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 63:1423-1433.
99. Douglas S.J., Chuck G., Dengler R.E., Pelecanda L., Riggs D.C. KNAT1 and ERECTA regulate inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002, 14:547-558.
100. Venglat S.P., et al. The homeobox gene BREVIPEDICELLUS is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:4730-4735.
101. Mele G., Ori N., Sato Y., Hake S. The knotted1-like homeobox gene BREVIPEDICELLUS regulates cell differentiation by modulating metabolic pathways. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:2088-2093.
102. Ragni L., Belles-Boix E., Gunl M., Pautot V. Interactions of KNAT6 and KNAT2 with BREVIDPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE in Arabidopsis inflorescences. Plant Cell 2008, 20:888-900.
103. van der Valk P., et al. Late heading of perennial ryegrass caused by introducing an Arabidopsis homeobox gene. Plant Breeding 2004, 123:531-535.
104. Dean G., Casson S., Lindsey K. KNAT6 gene of Arabidopsis is expressed in roots and is required for correct lateral root formation. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 54:71-84.
105. Etchells J.P., et al. A role for BELLRINGER in cell wall development is supported by loss-of-function phenotypes. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12:212.
106. Townsley B.T., Sinha N.R., Kang J. KNOX1 genes regulate lignin deposition and composition in monocots and dicots. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4. Article 21.
107. Fleet C.M., Sun T. A DELLAcate balance: the role of gibberellins in plant morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8:77-85.
108. Sehr E.M., et al. Analysis of secondary growth in the Arabidopsis shoot reveals a positive role of jasmonate signaling in cambium formation. Plant J. 2010, 63:811-822.
109. Heinrich M., et al. High levels of jasmonic acid antagonize the biosynthesis of gibberellins and inhibit the growth of Nicotiana attenuata stems. Plant J. 2013, 73:591-606.
110. Canet J.V., Dobón A., Fajmonova J., Tornero P. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes of Arabidopsis are essential for resistance induced by methyl jasmonate. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12:199.
111. Wu X.-M., et al. The tobacco BLADE-ON-PETIOLE2 gene mediates differentiation of the corolla abscission zone by controlling longitudinal cell expansion. Plant Cell 2012, 159:835-850.
112. Roberts J.A., Elliot K.A., González-Carranza Z.H. Abscission, dehiscence, and other cell separation processes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53:131-158.
113. Liljegren S.J. Organ abscission: exit strategies require signals and moving traffic. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:670-676.
114. González-Carranaza Z.H., et al. A novel approach to dissect the abscission process in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:1342-1356.
115. Shi C.-L., et al. Arabidopsis class I KNOTTED-like homebox proteins act downstream in the IDA-HAE/HSL2 floral abscission signaling pathway. Plant Cell 2011, 23:2553-2567.
116. Kim J., et al. New clothes for the jasmonic acid receptor COI1: delayed abscission, meristem arrest and apical dominance. PLoS One 2013, 8:e60505.
117. Cai S., Lashbrook C.C. Stamen abscission zone transcriptome profiling reveals new candidates for abscission control: enhanced retention of floral organs in transgenic plants overexpressing Arabidopsis ZINC FINGER PROTEIN2. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:1305-1321.
118. Agustí J., Merelo P., Cercos M., Tadeo F.R., Talón M. Ethylene-induced differential gene expression during abscission of citrus leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:2717-2733.
119. Agustí J., Merelo P., Cercós M., Tadeo F.R., Talón M. Comparative transcriptional survey between laser-microdissected cells from laminar abscission zone and petiolar cortical tissue during ethylene-promoted abscission in citrus leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9:127.
120. Meir S., et al. Microarray analysis of the abscission-related transcriptome in the tomato flower abscission zone in response to auxin depletion. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1929-1956.
121. Meir S., et al. Identification of defense-related genes newly associated with tomato flower abscission. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:590-593.
122. Lewis M.W., Leslie M.E., Liljegren S.J. Plant separation: 50 ways to leave your mother. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9:59-65.
123. Girin T., Sorefan K., Østergaard L. Meristematic sculpting in fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:1493-1502.
124. Roeder A.H.K., Ferrándiz C., Yanofsky M.F. The role of the REPLUMLESS homeodomain protein in patterning the Arabidopsis fruit. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1630-1635.
125. Alonso-Cantabrana H., et al. Common regulatory networks in leaf and fruit pattering revealed by mutation in the ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 gene. Development 2007, 134:2663-2671.
126. Zhang Y., Fan W., Kinkema M., Li X., Dong X. Interaction of NPR1 with basic leucine zipper protein transcription factors that bind sequences required for salicylic acid induction of the PR-1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:6523-6528.
127. Després C., DeLong C., Glaze S., Liu E., Fobert P.R. The Arabidopsis NPR1/NIM1 protein enhances the DNA binding activity of a subgroup of the TGA family of bZIP transcription factors. Plant Cell 2000, 12:279-290.
128. Kinkema M., Fan W., Dong X. Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. Plant Cell 2000, 12:2339-2350.
129. Rochon A., Boyle P., Wignes T., Fobert P.R., Després C. The coactivator function of Arabidopsis NPR1 requires the core of its BTB/POZ domain and the oxidation of C-terminal cysteines. Plant Cell 2006, 18:3670-3685.
130. Wu Y., et al. The Arabidopsis NPR1 protein is a receptor for the plant defense hormone salicylic acid. Cell Reports 2012, 1:1-9.
131. Jakoby M., et al. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7:106-111.
132. Gatz C. From pioneers to team players: TGA transcription factors provide a molecular link between different stress pathways. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 2:151-159.
133. Zhang Y., Tessaro J.J., Lassner M., Li X. Knockout analysis of Arabidopsis transcription factors TGA2, TGA5, and TGA6 reveals their redundant and essential roles in systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2647-2653.
134. The Botany Array Resource, (accessed 30.06.13). http://www.bar.utoronto.ca/.
135. Thurow C., et al. Tobacco bZIP transcription factor TGA2.2 and the related factor TGA2.1 have distinct roles in plant defense responses and plant development. Plant J. 2005, 44:100-113.
136. Walsh J., Waters C.A., Freeling M. The maize gene liguleless2 encodes a basic leucine zipper protein involved in the establishment of the leaf blade-sheath boundary. Genes Dev. 1998, 11:208-218.
137. Bolduc N., O'Conner D., Moon J., Lewis M., Hake S. How to pattern a leaf. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2012, 77:47-51.
138. Walsh J., Freeling M. The liguleless2 gene of maize functions during the transition from the vegetative to the reproductive shoot apex. Plant J. 1999, 19:489-495.
139. Murmu J., et al. Arabidopsis basic leucine-zipper transcription factors TGA9 and TGA10 interact with floral glutaredoxins ROXY1 and ROXY2 and are redundantly required for anther development. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1492-1504.
140. Kesarwani M., Yoo J., Dong X. Genetic interactions of TGA transcription factors in the regulation of pathogenesis-related genes and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144:336-346.
141. Lindermayr C., Sell S., Muller B., Leister D., Durner J. Redox regulation of the NPR1-TGA1 system in Arabidopsis thaliana by nitric oxide. Plant Cell 2010, 22:2894-2907.
142. Shearer H.J., et al. Arabidopsis Clade I TGA transcription factors regulate plant defenses in an NPR1-independent fashion. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25:1459-1468.
143. Song Y.H., et al. Isolation of CONSTANS as a TGA4/OBF4 interacting protein. Mol. Cells 2008, 25:559-565.
144. Boyle P., et al. The BTB/POZ domain of the Arabidopsis disease resistance protein NPR1 interacts with the repression domain of TGA2 to negate its function. Plant Cell 2009, 21:3700-3713.
145. Kung C.-C.S., Huang W.-N., Huang Y.-C., Yen K.-C. Proteomic survey of copper-binding proteins in Arabidopsis roots by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Proteomics 2006, 6:2746-2758.
146. Hochuli E., Bannwarth W., Döbeli H., Gentz R., Stüber D. A genetic approach to facilitate purification of recombinant proteins with a novel metal chelate adsorbent. Nat. Biotechnol. 1988, 6:1188-1321.
147. Rodriguez F.I., et al. A copper cofactor for the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 283:996-998.
148. Mou Z., Fan W., Dong X. Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes. Plant Cell 2003, 113:935-944.
149. Tada Y., et al. Plant immunity requires conformational changes of NPR1 via s-nitrosylation and thioredoxins. Science 2008, 321:952-956.
150. Foyer C.H., Noctor G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17:1866-1875.
151. Després C., et al. The Arabidopsis NPR1 disease resistance protein is novel cofactor that confers redox regulation of DNA binding activity to the basic domain/leucine zipper transcription factor TGA1. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2181-2191.
152. Xing S., Rosso M.G., Zachgo S. ROXY1, a member of the plant glutaredoxin family, is required for petal development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2005, 132:1555-1565.
153. Xing S., Zachgo S. ROXY1 and ROXY2, two Arabidopsis glutaredoxin genes, are required for anther development. Plant J. 2008, 53:790-801.
154. Spoel S.H., Mou Z., Tada Y., Spivey N.W., Genschik P., Dong X. Proteosome-mediated turnover of the transcription cofactor NPR1 plays dual roles in regulating plant immunity. Cell 2009, 137:860-872.
155. Pieterse C.M.J. Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:308-316.
156. Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43:205-227.
157. Pieterse C.M.J., Van der Does D., Zamioudis C., Leon-Reyes A., Van Wees S.C.M. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28:489-521.
158. Pieterse C.M.J., et al. A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1571-1580.
159. Ahn I.-P., Lee S.-W., Suh S.-C. Rhizobacteria-induced priming in Arabidopsis is dependent on ethylene, jasmonic acid, and NPR1. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20:759-768.
160. Spoel S.H., et al. NPR1 modulates cross-talk between salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways through a novel function in the cytosol. Plant Cell 2003, 15:760-770.
161. Spoel S.H., Johnson J.S., Dong X. Regulation of tradeoffs between plant defenses against pathogens with different lifestyles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:18842-18847.
162. Zander M., Camera S.L., Lamotte O., Métraux J.-P., Gatz C. Arabidopsis thaliana class-II TGA transcription factors are essential activators of jasmonic acid/ethylene-induced defense responses. Plant J. 2010, 61:200-210.
163. Crespi M., Frugier F. De novo organ formation from differentiated cells: root nodule organogenesis. Sci. Signal. 2008, 1:R11.
164. Ferguson B.J., Reid J.B. Cochleata: getting to the root of legume nodules. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46:1583-1589.
165. Atta R., et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J. 2009, 57:626-644.
166. Chatfield S.P., et al. Incipient stem cell niche conversion in tissue culture: using a systems approach to probe early events in WUSCHEL-dependent conversion of lateral root primordia into shoot meristems. Plant J. 2013, 73:798-813.