Identification and dissociation in rhetorical exposé: An analysis of St. Irenaeus’Against Heresies

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 49-76

  Sullivan, Dale ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889662744     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773949909391137     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aristotle. The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. New York: the Modern Library, 1954.
2. Attridge, Harold W. and George W. MacRae. “The Gospel of Truth (1,3 and XII,2): Introduced and translated by Harold W. Attridge and George MacRae.” The Nag Hammadi Library in English. Ed. James M. Robinson. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1988. 38-51.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.
4. ndedition. Ed. Robert A. Kraft and Gerhard Krodel. Trans. A team from Philadelphia Seminar on Christian Origins. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971.
5. Beale, Walter H. “Rhetorical Performative Discourse: A New Theory of Epideictic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 11 (1978): 221-246.
6. Berkenkotter, Carol and Thomas N. Huckin. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
7. Black, Edwin. “Secrecy and Disclosure as Rhetorical Forms.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 74 (1988): 133-150.
8. Booth, Wayne C. Modem Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1974.
9. Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.
10. Brown, Peter. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards Christian Empire. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1992.
11. Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. 1962. Berkeley: U of California P, 1969.
12. Brown, Peter. “Rhetoric and Poetics.” Language as Symbolic Action. Berkeley: U of California P, 1968. 295-307.
13. Burkert, Walter. “The Problem of Ritual Killing.” Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard, and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Ed. Robert G. Hamerton-Kelly. Standford, CA: Stanford UP, 1987. 149-176.
14. Cameron, Averil. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development Christian Discourse. Berkeley: U of California P, 1991.
15. Carter, Michael. “The Ritual Functions of Epideictic Rhetoric: The Case of Socrates’ Funeral Oration.” Rhetorica 9 (1991): 209-232.
16. Condit, Celeste Michelle. “The Functions of Epideictic: The Boston Massacre Orations as Exemplar.” Communication Quarterly 33 (1985): 284-299.
17. Consigny, Scott. “Sophistic Challenges: Gorgias’s Epideictic Rhetoric and Postmodern Performance Art.” Rhetoric in the Vortex of Cultural Studies: Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference. Ed. Arthur Walzer. St. Paul, MN: Rhetoric Society of America, 1992. 110-119.
18. Donovan, Mary Ann, SC. “Irenaeus in Recent Scholarship.” The Second Century 4 (1984): 217-241.
19. Duffy, Bernard K. “The Platonic Functions of Epideictic Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (1983): 70-93.Edwards, M. J. “Gnostics and Valentinians in the Church Fathers.” Journal of Theological Studies, NS 40 (1989): 26-47.
20. Filoramo, Giovanni. A History of Gnosticism. Trans. Anthony Alcock. Basil Blackwell, 1990.
21. Fisher, Walter R. “A Motive View of Communication.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 56 (1970): 131-139.
22. Foerster, Wemer. Gnosis: A Selection of Gnostic Texts. Ed. R. McL. Wilson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
23. Gamble, Harry Y. Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven: Yale UP, 1995.
24. Girard, René. The Scapegoat. Trans. Yvonne Freccero. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1986.
25. Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred. Trans. Patrick Gregoray. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1972.
26. Grant, Robert M. Greek Apologists of the Second Century. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1988.
27. Grant, Robert M. “Carpocratians and Curriculum: Irenaeus’ Reply.” Harvard Theological Review 79 (1986): 127-136.
28. Grant, Robert M. “Irenaeus and Hellenistic Culture.” Harvard Theological Review 43 (1949): 41-51.
29. Green, Henry, A. “Ritual in Valentinian Gnosticism: A Sociological Interpretation.” The Journal of Religious History 12 (1982): 109-124..
30. Greer, Rowan A. “The Dog and the Mushrooms: Irenaeus’s View of the Valentinians Assessed.” The Rediscovery of Gnosticism. Volume One: The School of Valentinus. Ed. Bentley Layton. Leiden, 1980.146-172.
31. Halloran, Michael. “Doing Public Business in Public.” Form and Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action. Ed. Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1978. 118-138.
32. Huxman, Susan Schultz and Wil A. Linkugel. “Accusations and Apologies from a General, a Senator, and a Priest. Oratorical Encounters: Selected Studies and Sources of Twentieth-Century Political Accusations and Apologies. Ed. Halford Ross Ryan. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.
33. The International Inductive Study Bible. New American Standard Version. Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House Publishers, 1992.
34. Irenaeus. Against Heresies. The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325. V. I. The American Reprint of the Edinburgh Edition. Ed. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. Revised by A. Cleveland Coxe. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing: Grand Rapids, MI, 1989. 307-567.
35. Irenaeus. Contre les héréies, livre I, édition critique par A. Rousseau et L. Doutreleau. SC 263-264; 2 vols, Paris, 1979.
36. Jonas, Hans. The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity. Second Edition. 1958. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.
37. Kennedy, George A. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modem Times. Chapel Hill: The U of North Carolina P, 1980.
38. Kennedy, George A. GreekRhetoric Under Christian Emperors. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.
39. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
40. Lawson, John. The Biblical Theology of Saint Irenaeus. London: The Epworth Press, 1948.
41. Liddell, Henry George and Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.
42. Mackin, James A., Jr. “Schismogenesis and Community: Pericles’ Funeral Oration.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 77 (1991): 251-262.
43. McKerrow, Raymie. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.” Communication Monographs 56 (1989): 91-111.
44. McCue, James F. “Conflicting Versions of Valentinianism? Irenaeus and the Excerpta Ex Theodoto.” The Rediscovery of Gnosticism. V. 1. Ed. Bentley Layton. Leiden, E. J. Brill, 1980.404-416.
45. McKeon, Richard. “Literary Criticism and the Concept of Imitation in Antiquity.” Modem Philology 34 (August 1936): 1-35.
46. Miller, Carolyn R. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 151-67.
47. Minns, Denis. Irenaeus. Georgetown UP, 1994.
48. Murphy, John M. “‘A Time of Shame and Sorrow’: Robert F. Kennedy and the American Jeremiad.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 76 (1990): 401-414.
49. Nielsen, J. T. Adam and Christ in the Theology of Irenaeus of Lyons. Assen 1968.
50. Olson, Mark Jeffrey. Irenaeus, The Valentinian Gnostics, and the King of God (A.H. Book V): The Debate About 1 Corinthians 15:50. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1992.
51. Oravec, Christine. “‘Observation’ in Aristotle’s Theory of Epideictic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (1976): 162-174.
52. Pagels, Elaine. Adam, Eve, and the Serpent. New York: Random House, 1988.
53. Pagels, Elaine. “Conflicting Versions of Valentinian Eschatology: Irenaeus’ Treatise vs. The Excerpts from Theodotus.” Harvard Theological Review 67 (1974): 35-53.
54. Pagels, Elaine. The Gnostic Gospels. 1979. New York: Vintage Books 1989.
55. Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: Notre Dame UP, 1969.
56. Perkins, Pheme. “Ireneus and the Gnostics: Rhetoric and Composition in Ad- versus Haereses Book One.” Vigiliae Christianae 30 (1976): 193-200.
57. rdEdition. Ed. James M. Robinson. San Francisco: Harper Row, 1988.
58. Rosenfield, Lawrence W. “The Practical Celebration of Epideictic.” Rhetoric in Transition: Studies in the Nature and Uses of Rhetoric. Ed. Eugene E. White. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State UP, 1980.131-155.
59. Ryan, Halford Ross. “Kategoria and Apologia: On their Rhetorical Criticism as a Speech Set.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (1982): 254-261.
60. Schoedel, Wiliam R. Ignatius of Antioch: A Commentary on the Letters of Ignatius of Antioch. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.
61. Schoedel, Wiliam R. “Philosophy and Rhetoric in the Adversus Haereses of Irenaeus.” Vigiliae Christianae 13 (1959): 22-32.
62. Schoedel, Wiliam R. “Theological Method in Irenaeus (Adversus Haereses 2. 25-28).” Journal of Theological Studies, N. S. 35 (1984): 31-49.
63. Scott, Robert L. “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.” Central States Speech Journal 18 (1967): 9 -16.
64. Sheard, Cynthia Miecznikowski. “The Public Value of Epideictic Rhetoric.” College English 58 (1996): 765-794.
65. Sullivan, Dale L. “The Epideictic Rhetoric of Science.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 5 (1991): 229-245.
66. Sullivan, Dale L. “Establishing Orthodoxy: The Letters of Ignatius of Antioch as Epideictic Rhetoric.” The Journal of Communication and Religion 15 (1992): 71-86.
67. Sullivan, Dale L. “The Ethos of Epideictic Encounter.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (1993): 113-133.
68. Sullivan, Dale L. “Kairos and the Rhetoric of Belief.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 78 (1992): 317-332.
69. Therbom, Goran. The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Verso, 1980.
70. Hessen, Terrance L. Irenaeus on the Salvation of the Unevangelized. ATLA Monograph Series, No. 31. Metuchen, N. J.: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 1993.
71. Vallée, Gerard. A Study in Anti-Gnostic Polemics: Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and Epiphanius. Studies in Christianity and Judaism. Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion. Wilfrid Laurier UP, 1981.
72. Van Unnik, W. C. “An Interesting Document of Second Century Theological Discussion (Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. 1.10.3).” Vigilae Christianae 31 (1977): 196-228.
73. Ware, B. L. and Wil A. Linkugel. “They Spoke in Defense of Themselves: On the Generic Criticism of Apologia.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973): 273-283.
74. Wingren, Gustaf. Man and the Incarnation: A Study of the Biblical Theology of Irenaeus. Trans. Ross Mackenzie. Philadelphia: Muhlenberg Press, 1959.
75. Wisse, Frederik. “The Nag Hammadi Library and the Heresiologists.” Vigiliae Christianae 25 (1971): 205-223.