-
1
-
-
46749115095
-
Saying what you mean and meaning what you say [editorial]
-
Rogers FJ. Saying what you mean and meaning what you say [editorial]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008;108(6):281-282.
-
(2008)
J Am Osteopath Assoc
, vol.108
, Issue.6
, pp. 281-282
-
-
Rogers, F.J.1
-
2
-
-
84868374292
-
To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journals
-
published online August 10, 2012
-
Einerson TR, Koren G. To accept or reject? a guide to peer reviewing of medical journals [published online August 10, 2012]. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2012;19(2):e328-e333.
-
(2012)
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol
, vol.19
, Issue.2
-
-
Einerson, T.R.1
Koren, G.2
-
3
-
-
79955120971
-
Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers
-
doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x
-
Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(1):1-13. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x.
-
(2011)
Ann Behav Med
, vol.42
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-13
-
-
Lovejoy, T.I.1
Revenson, T.A.2
France, C.R.3
-
4
-
-
0032527568
-
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
-
Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA. 1998;280(3):231-233.
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, Issue.3
, pp. 231-233
-
-
Black, N.1
van Rooyen, S.2
Godlee, F.3
Smith, R.4
Evans, S.5
-
5
-
-
84889685727
-
-
Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: peer review. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors website, Accessed October 15, 2013
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: peer review. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors website. http://www.icmje.org/ethical_3peer.html. Accessed October 15, 2013.
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
-
-
-
6
-
-
0025020192
-
Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism
-
Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1321-1322.
-
(1990)
JAMA
, vol.263
, Issue.10
, pp. 1321-1322
-
-
Kronick, D.A.1
-
7
-
-
0025015166
-
The evolution of editorial peer review
-
Burnham JC. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1323-1329.
-
(1990)
JAMA
, vol.263
, Issue.10
, pp. 1323-1329
-
-
Burnham, J.C.1
-
8
-
-
84868202030
-
How to peer review a scientific or scholarly article
-
Keenum A, Shubrook J. How to peer review a scientific or scholarly article. Osteopath Fam Physician. 2012;4(6):176-179.
-
(2012)
Osteopath Fam Physician
, vol.4
, Issue.6
, pp. 176-179
-
-
Keenum, A.1
Shubrook, J.2
-
10
-
-
0347763589
-
How to write a review paper
-
doi:10.1152/advan.00057.2002
-
Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. How to write a review paper. Adv Physiol Educ. 2003;27(2):47-52. doi:10.1152/advan.00057.2002.
-
(2003)
Adv Physiol Educ
, vol.27
, Issue.2
, pp. 47-52
-
-
Benos, D.J.1
Kirk, K.L.2
Hall, J.E.3
-
12
-
-
0037108630
-
How I review an original scientific article
-
Hoppin FG Jr. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(8):1019-1023.
-
(2002)
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
, vol.166
, Issue.8
, pp. 1019-1023
-
-
Hoppin Jr., F.G.1
-
13
-
-
84889662196
-
-
Council of Science Editors, Wheat Ridge, CO: Council of Science Editors, Accessed November 5, 2013
-
Council of Science Editors. CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update. Wheat Ridge, CO: Council of Science Editors; 2012. http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/files/public/entire_whitepaper.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2013.
-
(2012)
CSE's White Paper On Promoting Integrity In Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update
-
-
|