메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 113, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 916-920

Peer review guidance: How do you write a good review?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; STANDARD; WRITING;

EID: 84889662486     PISSN: 00986151     EISSN: 19451997     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (19)

References (14)
  • 1
    • 46749115095 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Saying what you mean and meaning what you say [editorial]
    • Rogers FJ. Saying what you mean and meaning what you say [editorial]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008;108(6):281-282.
    • (2008) J Am Osteopath Assoc , vol.108 , Issue.6 , pp. 281-282
    • Rogers, F.J.1
  • 2
    • 84868374292 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journals
    • published online August 10, 2012
    • Einerson TR, Koren G. To accept or reject? a guide to peer reviewing of medical journals [published online August 10, 2012]. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2012;19(2):e328-e333.
    • (2012) J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol , vol.19 , Issue.2
    • Einerson, T.R.1    Koren, G.2
  • 3
    • 79955120971 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers
    • doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x
    • Lovejoy TI, Revenson TA, France CR. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(1):1-13. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x.
    • (2011) Ann Behav Med , vol.42 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-13
    • Lovejoy, T.I.1    Revenson, T.A.2    France, C.R.3
  • 4
    • 0032527568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
    • Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA. 1998;280(3):231-233.
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , Issue.3 , pp. 231-233
    • Black, N.1    van Rooyen, S.2    Godlee, F.3    Smith, R.4    Evans, S.5
  • 5
    • 84889685727 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: peer review. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors website, Accessed October 15, 2013
    • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: peer review. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors website. http://www.icmje.org/ethical_3peer.html. Accessed October 15, 2013.
    • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
  • 6
    • 0025020192 scopus 로고
    • Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism
    • Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1321-1322.
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , Issue.10 , pp. 1321-1322
    • Kronick, D.A.1
  • 7
    • 0025015166 scopus 로고
    • The evolution of editorial peer review
    • Burnham JC. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1323-1329.
    • (1990) JAMA , vol.263 , Issue.10 , pp. 1323-1329
    • Burnham, J.C.1
  • 8
    • 84868202030 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to peer review a scientific or scholarly article
    • Keenum A, Shubrook J. How to peer review a scientific or scholarly article. Osteopath Fam Physician. 2012;4(6):176-179.
    • (2012) Osteopath Fam Physician , vol.4 , Issue.6 , pp. 176-179
    • Keenum, A.1    Shubrook, J.2
  • 10
    • 0347763589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to write a review paper
    • doi:10.1152/advan.00057.2002
    • Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. How to write a review paper. Adv Physiol Educ. 2003;27(2):47-52. doi:10.1152/advan.00057.2002.
    • (2003) Adv Physiol Educ , vol.27 , Issue.2 , pp. 47-52
    • Benos, D.J.1    Kirk, K.L.2    Hall, J.E.3
  • 12
    • 0037108630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How I review an original scientific article
    • Hoppin FG Jr. How I review an original scientific article. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(8):1019-1023.
    • (2002) Am J Respir Crit Care Med , vol.166 , Issue.8 , pp. 1019-1023
    • Hoppin Jr., F.G.1
  • 13
    • 84889662196 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Council of Science Editors, Wheat Ridge, CO: Council of Science Editors, Accessed November 5, 2013
    • Council of Science Editors. CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update. Wheat Ridge, CO: Council of Science Editors; 2012. http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/files/public/entire_whitepaper.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2013.
    • (2012) CSE's White Paper On Promoting Integrity In Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.