Informed Consent and Standard of Care: What Must Be Disclosed

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 9-13

  Macklin, Ruth ^a   Shepherd, Lois ^b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

human subjects research; informed consent; IRB (institutional review board); research ethics; risk benefit analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARD; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

CONSENT FORMS; DISCLOSURE; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NEGOTIATING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; STANDARD OF CARE; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84889647576     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.849303     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, C. G., Benitz, W. E. and Madan, A. 2004. Retinopathy of prematurity and pulse oximetry: A national survey of recent practices. Journal of Perinatology, 24 (3): 164-168.
2. Cole, C. H., Wright, K. W., Tarnow-Mordi, W. and Phelps, D. L. 2003. Resolving our uncertainty about oxygen therapy. Pediatrics, 112: 1415-1419.
3. Drazen, J. M., Solomon, C. G. and Greene, M. F. 2013. Informed consent and SUPPORT. New England Journal of Medicine, doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1304996
4. Hudson, K. L., Guttmacher, A. E. and Collins, F. S. 2013. In support of SUPPORT. A view from the NIH. New England Journal of Medicine, doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1306986
5. King, N. M. P. 2000. Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 28 (4): 332-343.
6. Magnus, D. 2013. OHRP throws a wet blanket on comparative effectiveness research. Available at: http://www.bioethics.net/2013/04/ohrp-throws-a-wet-blanket-on-comparative-effectiveness-research
7. Magnus, D. and Caplan, A. L. 2013. Risk, consent, and SUPPORT. New England Journal of Medicine, doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1305086
8. Modi, N. 2013. How not to reduce uncertainties in care. British Medical Journal, 2013: 346
9. Macklin, R. 2013. The OHRP and SUPPORT-Another View. New England Journal of Medicine, e3 (1)-(3) doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1308015
10. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. 2004. The surfactant positive airway pressure and pulse oximetry trial in extremely low birth weight infants. August 28. Revised September 16, 2004; updated March 28, 2005. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/library/Protocol.pdf
11. Office for Human Research Protections. 2013a. Letter to the University of Alabama at Birmingham. March 7. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/detrm_letrs/YR13/mar13a.pdf.
12. Office for Human Research Protections. 2013b. Letter to the University of Alabama at Birmingham. June 4. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/detrm_letrs/YR13/jun13a.pdf.
13. Rich, W., Finer, N. N. Gantz, M. G. 2012. Enrollment of extremely low birth weight infants in a clinical research study may not be representative. Pediatrics, 129 (3): 480-484.
14. Truog, R. D., Robinson, W. and Randolph, A. 1999. Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials?. New England Journal of Medicine, 340: 804-806.
15. Wilfond, B. S. 2013. The OHRP and SUPPORT. New England Journal of Medicine, doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1307008