The leakage impact valuation (LIV) method for leakage from geologic CO 2 storage reservoirs

Energy Procedia

Volumn 37, Issue , 2013, Pages 2819-2827

  Pollak, Melisa F ^a   Bielicki, Jeffrey M ^b   Dammel, Joseph A ^b   Wilson, Elizabeth J ^b   Fitts, Jeffrey P ^c   Peters, Catherine A ^c  

^a BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide storage; Carbon sequestration; Cost; Financial consequences; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889643422     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.167     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; Coninck, H.; Loos, M.; Meyer, J. P., Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Special Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2005.
2. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdon and New York, N.Y. USA 2007.
3. Hnottavange-Telleen, K.; Krapac, I.; Vivalda, C., Illinois Basin-Decatur Project: Initial risk-assessment results and framework for evaluating site performance. Energy Procedia 2009, 1 (1), 2431-2438.
4. 2 storage in saline aquifers: A comparison of lay and expert perceptions of risk. Energy Procedia 2011, 4 (0), 6360-6367.
5. U.S. DOE Final Risk Assessment Report for the Future Gen Project Environmental Impact Statement; U. S. Department of Energy: 04, 2007; p 370.
6. 2. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 4059-4066.
7. US EPA Vulnerability Evaluation Framework for Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide; EPA430-R-08-009; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: July 10, 2008.
8. 2 Storage Site Selection; LBNL-58873; Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division: September 20, 2005; p 29.
9. 2 leakage scenario: Results from field, laboratory, and modeling studies at a natural analog site in New Mexico, USA. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 3239-3245.
10. Siirila, E. R.; Navarre-Sitchler, A. K.; Maxwell, R. M.; McCray, J. E., A quantitative methodology to assess the risks to human health from CO2 leakage into groundwater. Advances in Water Resources, February 2012, (36), 146-164.
11. Trabucchi, C.; Donlan, M.; Wade, S., A multi-disciplinary framework to monetize financial consequences arising from CCS projects and motivate effective financial responsibility. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4 (2), 388-395.
12. U.S. EPA, Federal Requirements Under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells. F.R. Vol. 75, No. 237, Friday Dec. 10 2010: 2010; Vol. 40 CFR Parts 124, 144, 145, 146, and 147, pp 77230-77303.
13. U.S. EPA, Final Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases from Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration. In 40 CFR Part 98.440, Wednesday 1 Dec 2010 ed.; FR Vol. 75 No. 230 2010; pp 75060-75089.
14. Nordbotten, J. M.; Celia, M. A.; Bachu, S.; Dahle, H. K., Semianalytical Solution for CO2 Leakage through an Abandoned Well. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (2), 602-611.