Developing, validating and evolving an approach to product line benefit and risk assessment

Conference Proceedings of the EUROMICRO

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 272-283

  Schmid, Klaus ^a   John, Isabel ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT APPROACHES; ECONOMIC SUCCESS; MULTIPLE-CASE STUDY; PRODUCT LINE DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT LINE ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES; TIME BASED;

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84889603124     PISSN: 10896503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EURMIC.2002.1046172     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Sergio Bandinelli and Goiuria Sagardui Mendieta. Domain potential analysis: Getting serious about product-lines. In Third International Workshop on Software Architectures for Product Families (IW-SAPF'3), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, March 15-17, Also as LNCS 1951, pages 75-81, 2000.
2. Andrew Beitz and Janne Jarvinnen. FAME - An approach for software process assessment. Technical Report 001. 00/E, Fraunhofer IESE, 2000.
3. Lionel C. Briand, Christiane Differding, and H. Dieter Rombach. Practical guidelines for measurement-based process improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice Journal, 2(3), 1997.
4. Paul Clements, Cristina Gacek, Peter Knauber, and Klaus Schmid. Successful software product line development in a small organization. In Paul Clements and Linda Northrop, editors, Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns, chapter 11. Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
5. Lou Cohen. Quality Function Deployment. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
6. Margaret J. Davis. Reuse strategy model: Planning aid for reuse-based projects. Technical Report CDRL 5159, Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS), July 1993.
7. Jean-Marc DeBaud and Klaus Schmid. A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 34-43, 1999.
8. Department of Defense - Software Reuse Initiative, Version . 1. Domain Scoping Framework, Volume 2: Technical Description, 1995.
9. David Dikel, David Kane, Steve Ornburn, William Loftus, and Jim Wilson. Applying software product-line architecture. IEEE Computer, 30(8):49-55, August 1997.
10. Ken Dymond. A Guide to the CMM - Understanding the Capability Maturity Model for Software. Process Inc. US, fourth edition, 1996.
11. Khaled El Emam, Lionel Briand, and Robert Smith. Assessor agreement in rating spice processes. Technical Report ISERN-96-09, International Software Engineering Research Network, 1996.
12. Khaled El Emam, Jean-Normand Drouin, and Walcélio Melo. SPICE - The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. IEEE Computer Society, 1998.
13. Khaled El Emam, Dennis R. Goldenson, Lionel Briand, and Peter Marshall. Interrater agreement in SPICE-based assessments: Some preliminary results. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Software Process, pages 149-156, December 1996.
14. Khaled El Emam and Peter Marshall. Interrater agreement in assessment ratings. In Khaled El Emam, Jean-Normand Drouin, and Walcélio Melo, editors, SPICE - The Theory and Practice of Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, chapter 16, pages 357-362. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998.
15. International Organisation for Standardisation (Ed. ). ISO/IEC TR 15504-2 "Information Technology - Software Process Assessment - Part 2: A Reference Model for Processes and Process Capability". Case Postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
16. James Herbsleb, Anita Carleton, James Rozum, Jane Siegel, and David Zubrow. Benefits of CMM-based software process improvement: Initial results. Technical Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-013, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994.
17. Robin Hunter and Ho-Won Jung. Some experiences and results from the SPICE trials. In Proceedings of the SPICE 2000, Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination, Limerick, Ireland 10-11, 2000, pages 91-105, 2000.
18. Peter Knauber and Klaus Schmid. Using a quantitative approach for defining generic components: A case study. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW'4), pages 131-135, 2000.
19. Wayne C. Lim. Managing Software Reuse. Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.
20. Lutz Prechelt. Kontrollierte Experimente in der Softwaretechnik: Potenzial und Methodik. Springer, 2001. In German.
21. David C. Rine and Robert M. Sonnemann. Investments in reusable software. a study of software reuse investment success factors. Journal of Systems and Software, 41(1):17-32, 1998.
22. Klaus Schmid. Product line mapping method. Technical Report 028. 00/E, Fraunhofer IESE, 2000.
23. Klaus Schmid. Scoping software product lines - an analysis of an emerging technology. In Patrick Donohoe, editor, Software Product Lines: Experience and Research Directions; Proceedings of the First Software Product Line Conference (SPLC1), pages 513-532. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
24. Klaus Schmid. An assessment approach to analyzing benefits and risks of product lines. In Proceedings of the Compsac'01, 2001.
25. Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation. Reuse Adoption Guidebook, Version 02. 00. 05, November 1993.