"Moving to the beat" improves timing perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1133-1139

  Manning, Fiona ^a   Schutz, Michael ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Crossmodal interactions; Multisensory; Music; Perception and action; Sensorimotor integration; Timing perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84889594432     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0439-7     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barnes, R., & Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 254-311.
2. Drake, C., & Botte, M.-C. (1993). Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: Evidence for a multiple-look model. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 277-286.
3. D'Ausilio, A., Altenmüller, E., Belardinelli, M. O., & Lotze, M. (2006). Cross-modal plasticity of the motor cortex while listening to a rehearsed musical piece. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 955-958.
4. Ehrlé, N., & Samson, S. (2005). Auditory discrimination of anisochrony: Influence of the tempo and musical backgrounds of listeners. Brain and Cognition, 58, 133-147.
5. Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Large, E. W., & Ross, B. (2012). Internalized timing of isochronous sounds is represented in neuromagnetic beta oscillations. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 1791-1802.
6. Goodale, M. A., & Westwood, D. A. (2004). An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 203-211.
7. Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 893-906.
8. Grahn, J. A., & McAuley, J. D. (2009). Neural bases of individual differences in beat perception. NeuroImage, 47, 1894-1903.
9. Grahn, J. A., & Rowe, J. B. (2009). Feeling the beat: Premotor and striatal interactions in musicians and nonmusicians during beat perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7540-7548.
10. Hibi, S. (1983). Rhythm perception in repetitive sound sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 4, 83-95.
11. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
12. Jones, M. R., & Yee, W. (1997). Sensitivity to time change: The role of context and skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 693-709.
13. Keele, S. W., Nicoletti, R., Ivry, R. I., & Pokorny, R. A. (1989). Mechanisms of perceptual timing: Beat-based or interval-based judgements? Psychological Research, 50, 251-256.
14. Krause, V., Pollok, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2010). Perception in action: The impact of sensory information on sensorimotor synchronization in musicians and non-musicians. Acta Psychologica, 133, 28-37.
15. Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119-159.
16. Loehr, J. D., Large, E. W., & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination and adaptation to rate change in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1292-1309.
17. Madison, G., & Merker, B. (2002). On the limits of anisochrony in pulse attribution. Psychological Research, 66, 201-207.
18. McAuley, J. D. (1995). Perception of time as phase: Toward an adaptive-oscillator model of rhythmic pattern processing. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bloomington: Indiana University.
19. McAuley, J. D., & Jones, M. R. (2003). Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: A comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1102-1125.
20. McAuley, J. D., & Kidd, G. R. (1998). Effect of deviations from temporal expectations on tempo discrimination of isochronous tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1786-1800.
21. Pashler, H. (2001). Perception and production of brief duration: Beat-based versus interval-based timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 485-493.
22. Patel, A. D., Iversen, J. R., Bregman, M. R., & Schulz, I. (2009). Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal. Current Biology, 19, 827-830.
23. Phillips-Silver, J., & Trainor, L. J. (2005). Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science, 308, 1430.
24. Phillips-Silver, J., & Trainor, L. J. (2007). Hearing what the body feels: Auditory encoding of rhythmic movement. Cognition, 105, 533-546.
25. Phillips-Silver, J., & Trainor, L. J. (2008). Vestibular influence on auditory metrical interpretation. Brain and Cognition, 67, 94-102.
26. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
27. Repp, B. H. (1998). Obligatory "expectations" of expressive timing induced by perception of musical structure. Psychological Research, 61, 33-43.
28. Repp, B. H. (1999). Detecting deviations from metronomic timing in music: Effects of perceptual structure on the mental timekeeper. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 529-548.
29. Repp, B. H. (2002). Perception of timing is more context sensitive than sensorimotor synchronization. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 703-716.
30. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 969-992.
31. Repp, B. H. (2010). Sensorimotor synchronization and perception of timing: Effects of music training and task experience. Human Movement Science, 29, 200-213.
32. Repp, B. H., & Doggett, R. (2007). Tapping to a very slow beat: A comparison of musicians and nonmusicians. Music Perception, 24, 367-376.
33. Repp, B. H., & Goehrke, R. M. (2011). Music notation, but not action on a keyboard, influences pianists' judgments of ambiguous melodies. Music Perception, 28, 315-320.
34. Repp, B. H., & Keller, P. E. (2004). Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects of intention, attention, and awareness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 499-521.
35. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Action can affect auditory perception. Psychological Science, 18, 6-7.
36. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Performed or observed keyboard actions affect pianists' judgements of relative pitch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2156-2170.
37. Su, Y.-H., & Pöppel, E. (2011). Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences. Psychological Research, 76, 373-382.
38. Trainor, L. J., Gao, X., Lei, J., Lehtovaara, K., & Harris, L. R. (2009). The primal role of the vestibular system in determining musical rhythm. Cortex, 45, 35-43.
39. Yee, W., Holleran, S., & Jones, M. R. (1994). Sensitivity to event timing in regular and irregular sequences: Influences of musical skill. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 461-471.
40. Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 547-558.