Applications and data analysis of next-generation sequencing

LaboratoriumsMedizin

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 305-315

  Vogl, Ina ^a   Benet Pagès, Anna ^b   Eck, Sebastian H ^a   Kuhn, Marius ^c   Vosberg, Sebastian ^d,e   Greif, Philipp A ^e   Metzeler, Klaus H ^e   Biskup, Saskia ^f   Müller Reible, Clemens ^g   Klein, Hanns Georg ^a  

^a Center for Human Genetics and Laboratory Medicine Dr Klein   (Germany)

^b Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum München MGZ   (Germany)

^c Genetikum   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^f CEGAT GMBH   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Data analysis; Molecular genetic diagnostics; Next generation sequencing (NGS)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICES; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84889593770     PISSN: 03423026     EISSN: 14390477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/labmed-2013-0016     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ, Constantinidou C, Gharbia SE, Wain J, et al. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:434-9.
2. Vogl I, Eck Sebastian H, Benet-Pagès A, Greif Philipp A, Hirv K, Kotschote S, et al. Diagnostic applications of next generation sequencing: working towards quality standards. J Lab Med 2012;36:227-39.
3. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981;147:195-7.
4. Smith TF, Waterman MS, Fitch WM. Comparative biosequence metrics. J Mol Evol 1981;18:38-46.
5. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970;48:443-53.
6. Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, Brown CG, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 2008;456:53-9.
7. Dolled-Filhart MP, Lee M Jr., Ou-Yang CW, Haraksingh RR, Lin JC. Computational and bioinformatics frameworks for next-generation whole exome and genome sequencing. Sci World J 2013;2013:730210.
8. Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:363-76.
9. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 2012;6:80-92.
10. Patel RK, Jain M. NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PloS One 2012;7:e30619.
11. Smith AD, Xuan Z, Zhang MQ. Using quality scores and longer reads improves accuracy of Solexa read mapping. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:128.
12. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25: 1754-60.
13. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:308-11.
14. Auer PL, Johnsen JM, Johnson AD, Logsdon BA, Lange LA, Nalls MA, et al. Imputation of exome sequence variants into population-based samples and blood-cell-trait-associated loci in African Americans: NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:794-808.
15. Bamford S, Dawson E, Forbes S, Clements J, Pettett R, Dogan A, et al. The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website. Br J Cancer 2004;91:355-8.
16. Akhras MS, Unemo M, Thiyagarajan S, Nyren P, Davis RW, Fire AZ, et al. Connector inversion probe technology: a powerful one-primer multiplex DNA amplification system for numerous scientific applications. PloS one 2007;2:e915.
17. Genomes Project C, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 2012;491:56-65.
18. Liu X, Jian X, Boerwinkle E. dbNSFP: a lightweight database of human nonsynonymous SNPs and their functional predictions. Hum Mutat 2011;32:894-9.
19. Fokkema IF, Taschner PE, Schaafsma GC, Celli J, Laros JF, den Dunnen JT. LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases. Hum Mutat 2011;32:557-63.
20. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010;7:248-9.
21. Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods 2010;7:575-6.
22. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009;4:1073-81.
23. Gargis AS, Kalman L, Berry MW, Bick DP, Dimmock DP, Hambuch T, et al. Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:1033-6.
24. Clark MJ, Chen R, Lam HY, Karczewski KJ, Chen R, Euskirchen G, et al. Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:908-14.
25. Gnirke A, Melnikov A, Maguire J, Rogov P, LeProust EM, Brockman W, et al. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:182-9.
26. Hehir-Kwa JY, Egmont-Petersen M, Janssen IM, Smeets D, van Kessel AG, Veltman JA. Genome-wide copy number profiling on high-density bacterial artificial chromosomes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and oligonucleotide microarrays: a platform comparison based on statistical power analysis. DNA Res 2007;14:1-11.
27. Hayes JL, Tzika A, Thygesen H, Berri S, Wood HM, Hewitt S, et al. Diagnosis of copy number variation by Illumina next generation sequencing is comparable in performance to oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridisation. Genomics 2013. Available online 15 April 2013.
28. Rigaill GJ, Cadot S, Kluin RJ, Xue Z, Bernards R, Majewski IJ, et al. A regression model for estimating DNA copy number applied to capture sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2357-65.
29. Xi R, Lee S, Park PJ. A survey of copy-number variation detection tools based on high-throughput sequencing data. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2012;Chapter 7:Unit7 19.