CV-PCR: A context-guided value-driven framework for patent citation recommendation

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2291-2296

  Oh, Sooyoung ^a   Lei, Zhen ^b   Lee, Wang Chien ^a   Mitra, Prasenjit ^b   Yen, John ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation; Heterogeneous network; Patent; Recommendation

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; CITATION; ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS; PATENT; PRECISION AND RECALL; RECOMMENDATION; SIMILARITY RELATIONS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS;

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84889579678     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2505515.2505659     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Bashir and A. Rauber. Improving retrievability of patents in prior-art search. Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 457-470, 2010.
2. Y. Cao, J. Fan, and G. Li. A user-friendly patent search paradigm. IEEE Trans. on KDE, 2012.
3. Y. Chen and Y. Chiu. An IPC-based vector space model for patent retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 47(3):309-322, May 2011.
4. A. Chin. Search for tomorrow: some side effects of patent office automation. NCL Rev., 87:1617, 2008.
5. A. Fujii. Enhancing patent retrieval by citation analysis. In Proc. of the 30th ACM SIGIR, 2007.
6. D. Ganguly, J. Leveling, W. Magdy, and G. J. Jones. Patent query reduction using pseudo relevance feedback. In Proc. of the 20th ACM CIKM, 2011.
7. Y. Guo and C. Gomes. Ranking structured documents: a large margin based approach for patent prior art search. In Proc. of the 21st IJCAI, 2009.
8. D. Harhoff, F. Narin, F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and statistics, 81(3):511-515, 1999.
9. W. Huang, S. Kataria, C. Caragea, P. Mitra, C. L. Giles, and L. Rokach. Recommending citations: translating papers into references. In Proc. of the 21st ACM CIKM, 2012.
10. L. S. Larkey. A patent search and classification system. In Proc. of the 4th ACM Conf. on Digital Libraries, 1999.
11. L. Liu, J. Tang, J. Han, M. Jiang, and S. Yang. Mining topic-level influence in heterogeneous networks. In Proc. of the 19th ACM CIKM, 2010.
12. S. Liu, H. Liao, S. Pi, and J. Hu. Development of a patent retrieval and analysis platform - a hybrid approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6):7864-7868, June 2011.
13. W. Magdy, J. Leveling, and G. Jones. Exploring structured documents and query formulation techniques for patent retrieval. Multilingual Information Access Evaluation I. Text Retrieval Experiments, pages 410-417, 2010.
14. T. Strohman, D. Metzler, H. Turtle, and W. B. Croft. Indri: A language model-based search engine for complex queries. In Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Analysis, 2005.
15. Y. Sun, J. Han, X. Yan, P. S. Yu, and T. Wu. Pathsim: Meta path-based top-k similarity search in heterogeneous information networks. VLDB'11, 2011.
16. J. Tang, B. Wang, Y. Yang, P. Hu, Y. Zhao, X. Yan, B. Gao, M. Huang, P. Xu, W. Li, et al. Patentminer: topic-driven patent analysis and mining. In Proc. of the 18th ACM SIGKDD, 2012.
17. M. Trajtenberg. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, pages 172-187, 1990.
18. X. Xue and W. B. Croft. Automatic query generation for patent search. In Proc. of the 18th CIKM, 2009.
19. X. Yu, Q. Gu, M. Zhou, and J. Han. Citation prediction in heterogeneous bibliographic networks. In Proc. of the 2012 SIAM Conf. on Data Mining, 2012.