Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science

Communicating Biological Sciences: Ethical and Metaphorical Dimensions

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 29-47

  Jasanoff, Sheila ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889574532     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
2. Bimber, B. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. 1994a. Global climate protection policy: The limits of scientific advice, Part 1. Global Environmental Change, 4(2), 140-159.
4. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. 1994b. Global climate protection policy: The limits of scientific advice, Part 2. Global Environmental Change, 4(3), 185-200.
5. Bush, V. 1945. Science - The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
6. Clarke, L. 1989. Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Clinton, W. 1994. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations' (Executive Order 12298) Washington, DC: White House, 11 February.
8. Commission of the European Communities. 2001. European Governance: A White Paper [Online, 27 July 2001). COM, 428. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriserv/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf [accessed February 24 2009].
9. European Commission. 1997. 1997 Communication of the European Commission on Consumer Health and Safety [Online]. COM, 97. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/index_en.html [accessed 24 February 2009].
10. Ewen, S.W.B. and Pusztai, A. 1999. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet, 354, 1353-1354.
11. Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. 1992. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post normal science, in Social Theories of Risk, edited by Sheldon Krimsky and D. Golding. New York: Praeger, 251-273.
12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
13. Graham, J.D. and Wiener, J.B. (eds) 1995. Risk versus Risk: Tradeoffs in Protecting Health and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Greenberg, D.S. 2001. Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Guston D.H. 2001. Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, United Kingdom. 2000. Third Report, Science and Society. London: Parliament Stationary Office. Available at http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm [accessed Februaary 24 2009].
17. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds) 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Jasanoff, J., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C. and Pinch, T. (eds) 1995. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
20. Joy, B. 2000. Why the future doesn't need us. Wired [Online], 8.04. Available at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html [accessed 24 February 2009].
21. Kevles, D.J. 1998. The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character. New York: Norton.
22. Losey, J.E., Rayor, L.S. and Carter, M.E. 1999.Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399, 214.
23. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
24. Palevitz, B.A. 2002. Corn goes pop, then kaboom: Nature regrets publishing a paper on transgene contamination in Mexico. The Scientist [Online, 29 April]. Available at http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/13011 [accessed 25 February 2009].
25. Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books. Reprinted in 2003. Minerva, 41, 223-244.
26. Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Price, D.K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
29. Schön, D.A. and Rein, M. 1994. Frame/Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
30. Service, R.F. 1998. Seed-sterilizing 'Terminator Technology' sows discord. Science, 282, 850-851.
31. Short, J.F. and Clarke, L. (eds) 1992. Organizations, Uncertainties, and Risk. Boulder: Westview Press.
32. Stern, P.C. and Fineberg, H.V. (eds) 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press.
33. Stokes, D.E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34. Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. The Washington Times 2002. Nature regrets publication of corn study. The Washington Times [Online 5 April 2002]. Available at http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20020405-9384015.htm.