Literary onomastics and language technology

Literary Education and Digital Learning: Methods and Technologies for Humanities Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 53-78

  Borin, Lars ^a   Kokkinakis, Dimitrios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889573024     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-932-8.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Alvarez-Altman, G., & Burelbach, F. M. (Eds.). (1987). Names in literature: Essays from Literary Onomastics Studies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2. Bontcheva, K., Dimitrov, M., Maynard, D., Tablan, V., & Cunningham, H. (2002). Shallow methods for named entity coreference resolution. In Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles. Nancy: TALN.
3. Borin, L., & Forsberg, M. (2008). Something old, something new: A computational morphological description of Old Swedish. In LREC 2008 Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaTeCH 2008) (pp. 9-16). Marrakech: ELRA.
4. Borin, L., Kokkinakis, D., & Olsson, L.-J. (2007). Naming the past: Named entity and animacy recognition in 19th century Swedish literature. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop: Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaTeCH) (pp. 1-8). Prague: ACL.
5. Bradley, J. (2005). What you foresee is what you get: Thinking about usage paradigms for computer assisted text analysis. TEXT Technology, 2, 1-19.
6. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.
7. Evans, R., & Orasan, C. (2000). Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts. In Proceedings of the DAARC 2000. (pp. 154-162). Lancaster, UK.
8. Fan, W., Wallace, L., Rich, S., & Zhang, Z. (2006). Tapping the power of text mining. Communications of the ACM, 49(9), 77-82. doi:10.1145/1151030.1151032
9. Flanders, J., Bauman, S., Caton, P., & Cournane, M. (1998). Names proper and improper: Applying the TEI to the classification of proper nouns. Computers and the Humanities, 31(4), 285-300. doi:10.1023/A:1001066508011
10. Fleischman, M., & Hovy, E. (2002). Fine grained classification of named entities. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational linguistics (pp. 1-7). Taipei: ACL.
11. Foster, I., Kesselman, C., & Tuecke, S. (2001). The anatomy of the Grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 15(3), 200-222. doi:10.1177/109434200101500302
12. Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H. (Eds.). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men.: Vol. 1. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Ide, N., & Romary, L. (2002). Standards for language resources. In Proceedings of the Third Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) (pp. 839-844). Las Palmas: ELRA.
14. Jackson, P., & Moulinier, I. (2007). Natural language processing for online applications: Text retrieval, extraction and categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Jessop, M. (2004). The visualization of spatial data in the humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19(3), 335-350. doi:10.1093/llc/19.3.335
16. Johannessen, J. B., Hagen, K., Haaland, Å., Björk Jónsdóttir, A., Nøklestad, A., & Kokkinakis, D. (2005). Named entity recognition for the mainland Scandinavian languages. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 20(1), 91-102. doi:10.1093/llc/fqh045
17. Juola, P. (2008). Killer applications in digital humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(1), 73-83. doi:10.1093/llc/fqm042
18. Kokkinakis, D. (2004). Reducing the effect of name explosion. In Proceedings of the LREC Workshop: Beyond Named Entity Recognition - Semantic Labeling for NLP. Lisbon: ELRA.
19. Kokkinakis, D., & Thurin, A. (2007). Anonymisation of Swedish clinical data. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 07). Amsterdam.
20. McCallum, A. (2005). Information extraction: Distilling structured data from unstructured text. Queue, 3(9), 48-57. doi:10.1145/1105664.1105679
21. Mikheev, A. (2000). Document centered approach to text normalization. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 136-143). Athens.
22. Olsson, F. (2008). Bootstrapping named entity annotation by means of active machine learning: A method for creating corpora. Data linguistica 21. Department of Swedish Language, University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from http://spraakdata.gu.se/publikationer/datalinguistica/DL21.pdf
23. Pettersson, G. (2005). Svenska språket under sjuhundra år: En historia om svenskan och dess utforskande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
24. Pilz, T., Ernst-Gerlach, A., Kempken, S., Rayson, P., & Archer, D. (2008). The identification of spelling variants in English and German historical texts: Manual or automatic? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23, 65-72. doi:10.1093/llc/fqm044
25. Ravin, Y., & Kazi, Z. (1999). Is Hillary Rodham Clinton the President? Disambiguating names across documents. In Workshop on Coreference and Its Applications. Maryland.
26. Rayson, P., Archer, D., Baron, A., Culpeper, J., & Smith, N. (2007). Tagging the Bard: Evaluating the accuracy of a modern POS tagger on Early Modern English corpora. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2007, University of Birmingham, UK. Retrieved September 14, 2008 from http://www.corpus.bham.ac.uk/corpling-proceedings07/index.htm
27. Sekine, S. (2004). Definition, dictionaries and tagger for extended named entity hierarchy. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Lisbon: ELRA.
28. Svedjedal, J. (2004). Almqvist och namnen. En studie i litterär onomastik. Samlaren, 125, 52-77.
29. Teleman, U. (2005). Language cultivation and language planning II: Swedish. In Bandle, O. (Eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages (Vol. 2, pp. 1970-1983). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
30. Text Encoding Initiative. (n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2008, http://www.tei-c.org
31. Tjong Kim Sang, E., & De Meulder, F. (2003). Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In [Edmonton, Canada: ACL.]. Proceedings of CoNLL, 2003, 142-147.
32. van Dalen-Oskam, K. (2005). Comparative literary onomastics. Retrieved September 6, 2008, from http://www.huygensinstituut.knaw.nl/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=197&Itemid=118
33. van Dalen-Oskam, K., & van Zundert, J. (2004). Modelling features of characters: Some digital ways of looking at names in literary texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 19(3), 289-301. doi:10.1093/llc/19.3.289
34. van der Sluijs, K., & Houben, G.-J. (2008). Metadata-based access to cultural heritage collections: The RHCe use case. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Personalized Access to Cultural Heritage (PATCH'2008). (pp. 15-25). Hanover.
35. XCES. (2008). XCES: Corpus encoding standard for XML. Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://www.xces.org