Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation

Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-427

  Kelly, Steven ^a   Tolvanen, Juha Pekka ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889464877     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470249260     Document Type: Book

References (123)

1. Albrecht, A.J., Gaffney, J.E., Jr, Software function, source lines of code, and development effort prediction: a software science validation, IEEE T Software Eng. 9, 6, 1983.
2. Alderson, A., Meta-CASE technology, in: Endres, A.,Weber, H. (Ed.), Software Development Environments and CASE Technology, Proceedings of European Symposium, Königswinter, June 17-19, No. 509, Springer-Verlag; Berlin, 1991, pp. 81-91.
3. Alderson, A., Experience of Bi-Lateral Technology Transfer Projects, 2nd IFIP WG8.6 Working Conference: Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, Technical Report SOCTR/97/04, Staffordshire University, 1997, http://www.soc.staffs.ac.uk/reports/soctr9704.html.
4. Alford, M., A Requirements Engineering Methodology for Real Time Processingc Requirements, IEEE T Software Eng. 3 (1), 60-69, 1977.
5. Amber, S., Agile Modeling Newsletters, Software Development Magazine, March, 2006.
6. Arango, G., Domain analysis methods, Software Reusability, Chichester, England, Ellis Horwood, 1994. AUTOSAR, AUTOSAR methodology, v. 1.0.1, 2006, http://www.autosar.org/download/AUTOSAR_Methodology.pdf.
7. Avison, D.E., Fitzgerald, G., Information systems development current themes and future directions, Inform. Software Technol. 30 (8), 458-466, 1988.
8. Babin, S. Developing Software for Symbian OS: An Introduction to Creating Smartphone Applications in C{thorn}{thorn}, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2005.
9. Batani, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, B., Conceptual database design: An entity relationship approach. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company, 1992.
10. Batory, D., Chen, G., Robertson, E., Wang, T., Design wizards and visual programming environments for GenVoca generators, IEEE T Software Eng. 26, 5, 2000.
11. Bell, A., Death by UML Fever, ACM Queue, Vol 2, no. 1, 2004.
12. Bettin, J., Measuring the potential of domain-specific modeling techniques, Proceedings of the Second Domain Specific Modeling Languages Workshop, Helsinki School of Economics, Working Paper series, 2002.
13. Bézivin, J., Ploquin, N., Tooling the MDA framework: a new software maintenance and evolution scheme proposal, Application Development Trends, 2001.
14. Bhanot, V., Paniscotti, D., Roman, A., Trask, B., Using domain-specific, modeling to develop software defined radio components and applications, Proceedings of the 5th OOPSLA Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (DSM'05), in: Tolvanen, J.-P., Sprinkle, J., Rossi, M., (Eds.), Computer Science and Information System Reports, Technical Reports, TR-36, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, 2005.
15. Blackwell, A., Metaphor in diagrams, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, September 1998.
16. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Unified Method for Object-Oriented Development, Documentation Set, Version 0.8, Rational Software Corporation, 1995.
17. Brinkkemper, S., Formalisation of Information Systems Modelling, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990.
18. Brooks, F., The Mythical Man-Month, Addison-Wesley, 1975.
19. Bubenko, J.A., A Method Engineering Approach to Information Systems Development, The Proceedings of the IFI P WG8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems Development Process, 1988, pp. 167-186.
20. Bubenko, J.A., Langefors, B., Sølvberg, A., Computer-Aided Information Systems Analysis and Design, Studentlitteratur, Nordforsk, Lund, 1971.
21. Buede, D.M., The Engineering Design of Systems, Wiley, 1999.
22. Caine, S.H., Gordon, E.K., PDL-A tool for software design, Proceedings of the National Computer Conference, AFIPS Press, 1975.
23. Chen, P.P., The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data, ACM T Database Sys. 1 (1), 9-36, 1976.
24. Compuware, Proving Productivity-An Independent J2EE Development Study, 2003, http://www.compuware.no/optimalJ/Middleware1.pdf accessed January 2007.
25. Costagliola, G., De Lucia, A., Orefice, S., Polese, G., A classification framework to support the design of visual languages, J. Visual Lang. Comput. 13 (6), 573-600, 2002.
26. Czarnecki, K., Generative software development, Invited talk at Seventh International Conference on UML Modeling Languages and Applications, October 10-15, 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.
27. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Classification of Model Transformation Approaches, Online Proceedings of the 2nd OOPSLA'03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of MDA, Anaheim, 2003.
28. Dubinsky, Y., Hartman, A., Keren, M., D5.3 Industrial ROI, Assessment, and Feedback, ModelWare Report No. 511731, 2006.
29. Duffy, D., Domain Architectures, Wiley, 2004.
30. Engstrom, E., Jonathan, K., Building and rapidly evolving domain-specific tools with DOME, IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control Systems Design, Anchorage, AL, USA, 2000, http://moncscs.mcgill.ca/people/mosterman/campam/cca01/cacsd00a/index.html/ek.pdf.
31. Fayad, M., Johnson, R., Domain-Specific Application Frameworks: Frameworks Experience by Industry, Wiley, 1999.
32. Ferguson, R.I., The beginner's guide to IPSYS TBK, University of Sunderland Occasional Paper 93/3, 1993.
33. Fitzgerald, G., Validating new information system techniques, in: H.E. Nissen., H.K. Klein., R. Hirschheim. (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.
34. Gane, C., Sarson, T., Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979.
35. Goldkuhl, G., Stefan, C., Customizable CASE Environments: A Framework for Design and Evaluation, Linköping University, Sweden, 1993.
36. Gray, T., Van Helsing, C., Popular Science, 07/2005.
37. Greenfield, J., Short, K., Software Factories: Assembling Applications with Patterns, Models, Frameworks, and Tools, Wiley, 2004.
38. Griss, M., Wentzel, K., Hybrid Domain-specific kits for a flexible software factory, Proceedings of ACM Software Applications Conference, SAC'94, 1994.
39. Gronback, Richard Podcast on GMF, 2006, http://eclipsezone.com/files/podcasts/1-GMFRichard.Gronback.html.
40. Haddad, C., Model-Driven Development: Rethinking the Development Process, Burton Group, 2004.
41. Haine, P., Second generation CASE: can it be justified?, in: Kathy S.;Paul L. (Ed.), CASE:Current Practice, Future Prospects, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1992.
42. Halstead, M.H., Elements of Software Science, Elsevier, North-Holland, New York, 1977.
43. Harel, D., Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems, Sci. Comput. Program. 8, 231-274, 1987.
44. Heym, M., Österle, H., Computer-aided methodology engineering, Infor. Software Technol. 35(6/7), 345-354, 1993.
45. Hietaniemi, J., Perl for Symbian, http://sourceforge.net/projects/symbianperl/ (accessed January 2006).
46. Iivari, J., Relationships aggregations and complex objects, in: Ohsuga, S; Kangassalo, H; Jaakkola, H, Hori, K, Yonezaki, N. (Eds. ), Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases III: Foundations, Theory and Applications, IOS Press, pp. 141-159, 1992.
47. International Telecommunication Union, Packet-based multimedia communication systems, Recommendation H.323, Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, Geneva, Switzerland, July 2003.
48. Isazadeh, H., Architecture analysis of MetaCASE, Ph.D. Thesis, 1997, http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq20654.pdf.
49. ISO ISO-IEC 10027, Information technology-Information Resource Dictionary System (IRDS)-Framework, ISO/IEC International standard, 1990, http://www.iso.org/.
50. Jackson, M.A., Software requirement & specifications, A Lexicon of Practice, Principles And Prejudices, Addison Wesley, ACM Press, 1995.
51. Jarke, M., Pohl, K., Weidenhaupt, K., Lyytinen, K., Marttiin, P., Tolvanen, J.-P., Meta modeling: a formal basis for interoperability and adaptability, in: Krämer, B; Papazoglou, M; Schmidt, H. (Eds.), Information Systems Interoperability, JohnWiley&Sons, Research Studies Press, Somerset, 1998.
52. Jarzabek, S., Tok, W.L., Model-based support for business re-engineering, Inform Software Technol. 38 (5), 355-374, 1996.
53. Jeulin, P., GraphTalk and the Metalogy, 2005, http://pjeulinmetadone.blogspot.com/2005/06/graphtalk-and-metalogy.html.
54. Johnson, L., A view from the 1960s: how the software industry began, IEEE Ann. Hist. Computl 20 (1), 36-42, 1998.
55. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, S., Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, Technical report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
56. Kelly, S., What's in a Relationship: on distinguishing property holding and object binding, in: Hesse, W., Falkenberg, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Information Systems Concepts, ISCO 3, University of Marburg, Lahn, Germany, 1995.
57. Kelly, S., CASE tool support for co-operative work in information system design, in:Rolland, C, Chen, Y, Fang, M. (Eds.), IFIP TC8/WG8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems in the WWW Environment, Chapman & Hall, 1998, pp. 49-69.
58. Kelly, S., Kalle, L., Matti, R., MetaEdit{thorn}: a fully configurable multi-user and Multi-tool CASE and CAME environment, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE'96, Heraklion, Crete, Greece May 1996,Constantopoulos et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science N:o 1080, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996, pp. 1-21.
59. Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P., Visual domain-specific modeling: benefits and experiences of using metaCASE tools, in: Bezivin, J., Ernst, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of International workshop on Model Engineering, ECOOP 2000.
60. Kieburtz, R., et al. A software engineering experiment in software component generation, Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, Berlin, IEEE Computer Society Press, March, 1996.
61. Kotteman, J., Konsynski, B., Information systems planning and development: strategic postures and methodologies, J Manage Inform Syst. 1, 2, 1984.
62. Kyo, C.K., Sholom, G.C., James, A.H.,William, E.N., Spencer, A., Peterson, Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
63. Lennox, J., Schulzrinne, H., Call Processing Language Framework and Requirements, May 2000, ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2824.txt.
64. Lennox, J., Wu, X., Schulzrinne, H., Call Processing Language (CPL): A Language for User Control of Internet Telephony Services, October 2004, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3880.txt.
65. Long, E., Misra, A., Sztipanovits, J., Increasing productivity at Saturn, IEEE Comput. 35-43, 1998.
66. Marttiin, P., Rossi, M., Tahvanainen,V.-P., Lyytinen, K., AComparative review of CASE shells:A preliminary framework and research outcomes, Inform. Manage. 25, 11-31, 1993.
67. Mathworks, MATLAB Desktop Tools and Development Environment, 2007.
68. McCabe, T.J., A complexity measure, IEEE T Software Eng. 2, 4, 1976.
69. MediaDev, Survey of DSM Attitudes and Tools among Lead Developers. 2006.
70. Mellor, S., Balcer, M., Executable UML: A Foundation for Model-Driven Architecture, Preface, Addison Wesley, 2002.
71. Mellor, S., Shlaer, S., Object Life Cycles: Modeling the World In States, Yourdon Press, Computing Series, 1991.
72. Meta Systems Ltd., QuickSpec. Reference guide, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1989.
73. MetaCase, EADS Case Study, 2006, http://www.metacase.com/papers/
74. MetaCase, Nokia Mobile Phones Case Study, 2000, http://www.metacase.com/papers/
75. Moore, M., Monemi, S., Wang, J., Marble, J., Jones, S., Diagnostics and integration in electrical utilities, IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference, Orlando, FL, May 2000.
76. Moore, W., Dean, D., Gerber, A., Wagenknecht, G., Vanderheyden, P., Eclipse Development using the Graphical Editing Framework and the Eclipse Modeling Framework, IBM Redbook, 2004, http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/sg246302.html?Open.
77. Narraway, D., Designing and generating mobile phone applications, Presentation at MetaEdit{thorn} Method Seminar, 6th Nov, Helsinki, Finland, 1998.
78. National Instruments, Labview Fundamentals, User Manual, 2005.
79. Nokia, Python for Series 60: API reference, version 1.0, 2004, http://www.forum.nokia.com/.
80. Nokia, S60 SDK documentation, version 2.0, 2005, http://www.forum.nokia.com/.
81. Nordstrom, G.G., Metamodeling-Rapid Design and Evolution of Domain-Specific Modeling Environments, Ph.D. Thesis, Vanderbilt University, 1999, http://www.isis.vanderbilt.edu/publications/archive/Nordstrom_GG_3_0_1999_Metamodeli.pdf.
82. Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., Verrijn-Stuart, AA., Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference on Comparative Review of Information Systems Design Methodologies, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
83. OMG, Meta Object Facility (MOF) specification, April, 2002, http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf.
84. OMG, MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, 2003, http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf.
85. OMG, Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Core Specification, 2005, http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/04-10-15.pdf.
86. OMG, Object Constraint Language, Version 2.0, 2006, http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/06-05-01.pdf.
87. Pastor, O., Ramos, I., OASIS: A Class-Definition Language to Model Information Systems Using an Object-Oriented Approach, UPV Publication Service, SP-UPV, pp 95-788, 1995.
88. Pocock, J.N., VSF and its relationship to open systems and standard repositories, in:Endres, A., Weber, H., (eds.), Software Development Environments and CASE Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
89. Raistrick, C., Francis, P., Wright, J., Carter, C., Wilkie, I., Model Driven Architecture with Executable UML, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
90. Raunio, A., Experiences on using DSM at EADS, DSM seminar presentation, in:Koskinen, M., Jauhiainen, E., (Eds.), Proceedings of Finnish Computing Science Days, University of Jyväskylä, TU-25, 2007.
91. Ripper, P., V-Market: A framework for agent mediated e-commerce systems based on virtual marketplaces, Msc. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, PUC-Rio, 1999.
92. Rosen, M., Enterprise Architecture Advisory Service, Cutter Consortium. 2006.
93. Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., Schooler, E., SIP: Session Initiation Protocol, RFC 3261, June 2002.
94. Rossum van, G., Drake, F.L., Jr, Extending and Embedding the Python Interpreter. Available (accessed Jan 2006), http://www.python.org/doc.
95. Rozenberg, G., (Ed.), Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformations, Vol. 1: Foundations, World Scientific, 1997.
96. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G., The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
97. Rust, K., personal communication on Westmount CASE tools, 1994.
98. Ruuska, J., Factors of CASE tool usability: An empirical study in a telecom company (in Finnish), University of Tampere, 2001.
99. SAE, AADL, Architecture Analysis & Design Language, SAE standard AS5506, 2004.
100. Schipper, M., Joosten, S., Avalidation procedure for information systems modeling techniques workshop on Evaluation of Modeling methods in Systems Analysis and Design, 8th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (CAiSE'96) 1996.
101. Seeley, R., ADT at Gartner ITxpo: Gates sees more modeling, less coding, Application Development Trends 3/30/2004, 2004, http://www.adtmag.com/article.aspx?id=9166.
102. Smolander, K., OPRR: a model for modelling systems development methods, in: Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P. (Eds.), Next Generation CASE Tools, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991.
103. Smolander, K., Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Marttiin, P., MetaEdit-a flexible graphical environment for methodology modelling, in: Andersen, R., Bubenko, J.A., jr; Solvberg, A. (Eds.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Proceedings of the Third International Conference CAiSE'91, Trondheim, Norway May 1991, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
104. TM (PLT2006b), 2006.
105. Stahl, T., Völter, M., Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management, Wiley, 2006.
106. Ströbele, T., EclipseUML-UMLund Eclipse, OOP Conference, 24-28 January, Munich, 2005.
107. Sutherland, I.E., Sketchpad: a man-machine graphical communication system, Proceedings of the AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference, Washington, D.C., 1963, pp. 329-346.
108. Sztipanovits, J., Karsai, G., Bapty, T., Self-adaptive software for signal processing, Communications of the ACM May 1998, 66-73.
109. Teichroew, D., Ernest, A.H., III, PSL/PSA: a computer-aided technique for structured documentation and analysis of information processing systems, IEEE T Software Eng. 3, (1), 41-48, 1977.
110. Teichroew, D., Petar, M., III, Ernest, A.H., Yuzo, Y., Application of the entity-relationship approach to information processing systems modelling, in: Chen, P.P. (Ed.), Entity-Relationship Approach to Systems Analysis and Design, North-Holland, 1980.
111. Tolvanen, J.-P., Incremental Method Engineering with Modeling Tools: Theoretical Principles and Empirical Evidence (Ph.D. thesis), Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science, Economics and Statistics, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 1998,http://www.cs.jyu.fi/~jpt/doc/index.html.
112. Tolvanen, J.-P., Kelly, S., Defining Domain-Specific Modeling Languages to Automate Product Derivation: Collected Experiences. Proceedings of the 9th International Software Product Line Conference, Springer-Verlag, LNCS3714, 2005.
113. Turing, A.M., On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem, Proc. London Mathe. Soc., Ser. 2 (42), 230-265, 1937.
114. Venable, J., CoCoA: A conceptual Data Modeling Approach for Complex Problem Domains, Dissertation, State University of New York at Bimghamton, USA. 1993.
115. Voelter, M., MDSD/PLE Conference in Leipzig, http://voelterblog.blogspot.com/2006/mdsdple-conference-in-leipzig.html.
116. Weber, R., Zhang, Y., An Analytical evaluation of NIAM's grammar for conceptual schema design. Information Systems Journal, 6, 1996.
117. Weiss, D., Lai, C.T.R., Software Product-line Engineering, Addison Wesley, Longman, 1999.
118. Welke, R.J., The CASE Repository: More than another database application, in:Cotterman ,W. W., Senn, J.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of 1988 INTEC Symposium Systems Analysis and Design: A Research Strategy, Atlanta, Georgia, Georgia State University, 1988.
119. White, S., Software architecture design domain, Proceedings of Second Integrated Design and Process Technology Conf., Austin, TX, December. 1-4, 1996, pp. 283-290.
120. Wijers, G., Modeling Support in Information Systems Development, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam, 1991.
121. Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge, and Kegan Paul, London, 1922.
122. Yourdon, E., Whatever happened to structured analysis?, Datamation, June 1986, pp. 133-138.
123. Zachariadis, S., Mascolo, C. Emmerich, W., The SATIN Component System-A Metamodel for Engineering Adaptable Mobile Systems in IEEE T Software Eng. October 2006.