Judging Covariation and Causation

Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 220-239

  Shanks, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Causal information; Causation; Covariation; Observation; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889420224     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470752937.ch11     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Aitken, M. R. F., Larkin, M. J. W., & Dickinson, A. (2000) Super-learning of causal judgements, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 59-81.
2. Allan, L. G. (1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147-9.
3. Alloy, L. B. & Tabachnik, N. (1984) Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information, Psychological Review, 91, 112-49.
4. Boynton, D. M. (2000) The psychophysics of informal covariation assessment: Perceiving relatedness against a background of dispersion, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 867-76.
5. Broniarczyk, S. M. & Alba, J. W. (1994) Theory versus data in prediction and correlation tasks, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 117-39.
6. Buehner, M. J., Cheng, P. W., & Clifford, D. (2003) From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1119-40.
7. Buehner, M. J. & May, J. (2002) Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction, Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 269-95.
8. Buehner, M. J. & May, J. (2003) Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: Effects of prior knowledge,experience, and reinforcement procedure, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,56A, 865-90.
9. Chapman, G. B. & Robbins, S. J. (1990) Cue interaction in human contingency judgment, Memory & Cognition, 18, 537-45.
10. Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. (1969) Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271-80.
11. Cheng, P. W. (1997) From covariation to causation: A causal power theory, Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
12. Cheng, P. W. & Holyoak, K. J. (1995) Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction. In H. L. Roitblat and J.-A. Meyer (eds.), Comparative Approaches to Cognitive Science (pp. 271-302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Cobos, P. L., López, F. J., Caño, A., Almaraz, J., & Shanks, D. R. (2002) Mechanisms of predictive and diagnostic causal induction, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 331-46.
14. Collins, D. J. & Shanks, D. R. (2002) Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment, Memory & Cognition, 30, 1138-47.
15. Collins, D. J. & Shanks, D. R. (2003) Conformity to the power PC theory of causal induction depends on type of probe question. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. De Houwer, J. & Beckers, T. (2002) Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55B, 137-51.
17. De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., & Glautier, S. (2002) Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 965-85.
18. Dennis, M. J. & Ahn, W.-K. (2001) Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships, Memory & Cognition, 29, 152-64.
19. Denniston, J. C., Savastano, H. I., Blaisdell, A. P., & Miller, R. R. (2003) Cue competition as a retrieval deficit, Learning and Motivation, 34, 1-31.
20. Dickinson, A. (2001) Causal learning: An associative analysis (The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture), Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54B, 3-25.
21. Glymour, C. & Cheng, P. W. (1998) Causal mechanism and probability: A normative approach.In M. Oaksford and N. Chater (eds.), Rational Models of Cognition (pp. 295-313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Gredebäck, G., Winman, A., & Juslin, P. (2000) Rational assessments of covariation and causality.In L. R. Gleitman and A. K. Joshi (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Hesslow, G. (1976) Two notes on the probabilistic approach to causality, Philosophy of Science, 43, 290-2.
24. Jennings, D. L., Amabile, T. M., & Ross, L. (1982) Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (pp. 211-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Larkin, M. J. W., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dickinson, A. (1998) Retrospective revaluation of causal judgments under positive and negative contingencies, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1331-52.
26. Lober, K. & Shanks, D. R. (2000) Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997), Psychological Review, 107, 195-212.
27. Maldonado, A., Catena, A., Cándido, A., & García, I. (1999) The belief revision model: Asymmetrical effects of noncontingency on human covariation learning, Animal Learning and Behavior, 27, 168-80.
28. Matute, H., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (1996) Test question modulates cue competition between causes and between effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 182-96.
29. Matute, H., Vegas, S., & De Marez, P. J. (2002) Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 714-25.
30. McKenzie, C. R. M. (1994) The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and Bayesian inference, Cognitive Psychology, 26, 209-39.
31. Melchers, K. G., Lachnit, H., & Shanks, D. R. (2004) Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: A challenge for comparator theory, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 25-53.
32. Shanks, D. R. (1989) Selectional processes in causality judgment, Memory & Cognition, 17, 27- 34.
33. Shanks, D. R. (1993) Associative versus contingency accounts of category learning: Reply to Melz, Cheng, Holyoak, and Waldmann (1993), Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1411-23.
34. Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., & Medin, D. L. (eds.) (1996) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation vol. 34): Causal Learning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Shanks, D. R., López, F. J., Darby, R. J., & Dickinson, A. (1996) Distinguishing associative and probabilistic contrast theories of human contingency judgment. In D. R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak, and D. L. Medin (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Causal Learning (vol. 34, pp. 265-311). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., & Dickinson, A. (1989) Temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 139-59.
37. Spellman, B. A. (1996) Conditionalizing causality. In D. R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak & D. L.Medin (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Causal Learning (vol. 34, pp. 167- 206). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Waldmann, M. R. (2001) Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 600-8.
39. Wasserman, E. A., Elek, S. M., Chatlosh, D. L., & Baker, A. G. (1993) Rating causal relations: The role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 174-88.
40. Well, A. D., Boyce, S. J., Morris, R. K., Shinjo, M., & Chumbley, J. I. (1988) Prediction and judgment as indicators of sensitivity to covariation of continuous variables, Memory & Cognition, 16, 271-80.