Entangled Systems: New Directions in Quantum Physics

Entangled Systems: New Directions in Quantum Physics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-338

  Audretsch, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889403072     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9783527619153     Document Type: Book

References (304)

1. Alber, G., Beth, T., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R., Rötteler, M., Weinfurter, H., Werner, R. und Zeilinger, A.: Quantum Information-An Introduction to Basic Theoretical Concepts and Experiments, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2001.
2. Audretsch, J., Diósi, L. und Konrad, T.: Estimating the postmeasurement state, Phys. Rev. A68, 034302 (2003).
3. Afriat, A. und Selleri, F.: The Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen paradox in atomic, nuclear, and particle physics, Plenum Press, New York, 1999.
4. Audretsch, J., Klee, F. E. und Konrad, T.: Monitoring Quantum Oscillations with very small Disturbance; quant-ph/0408107 (2004).
5. Audretsch, J., Konrad, T. und Scherer, A.: Quantum optical weak measurements can visualize photon dynamics in real time, Phys. Rev. A65, 033814(1-6) (2002).
6. Audretsch, J. und Lämmerzahl, C.: Establishing the Riemannian structure of spacetime by means of light rays and free matter waves, J. Math. Phys. 32, 2099-2105 (1991).
7. Audretsch, J. und Mainzer, K. (Ed.): Philosophie und Physik der Raum-Zeit, BIWiss.-Verl., Mannheim, 1988.
8. Audretsch, J. und Müller, R.: Localized discussion of stimulated processes for Rindler observers and accelerated detectors, Phys. Rev. D49, 4056-4065 (1994).
9. Audretsch, J. und Müller, R.: Radiation from a uniformly accelerated particle detector: Energy, particles and the quantum measurement process, Phys. Rev. D49, 6566-6575 (1994).
10. Audretsch, J. und Mainzer, K.(Ed.): Wieviele Leben hat Schrödingers Katze?-Zur Physik und Philosophie der Quantenmechanik, Spektrum Akad. Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996.
11. Arndt, M., Nairz, O. und Zeilinger, A.: Interferometry with Macromolecules and the Mesoscopic World, in [BZ 02], p. 334-350, 2002.
12. Aspect, A.:Bell's inequality test: More ideal than ever, Nature 398, 189-190 (1999).
13. Aspect, A.: Bell's Theorem: The Naive View of an Experimentalist, in [BZ 02], 119-153 (2002).
14. Audretsch, J. (Ed.): Entangled World-The Fascination of Quantum Information and Computation, Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2006.
15. Erweiterte Fassung der deutschen Ausgabe: Verschränkte Welt-Faszination der Quanten, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
16. Audretsch, J.: View into the quantum world I: fundamental phenomena and concepts, in [Aud 06], p. 1-37, View into the quantum world II: entanglement and its consequences, in [Aud 06], p. 39-62, 2006.
17. Auletta, G.: Foundations and Interpretations of quantum mechanics, World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.
18. Ballentine, L. E.: The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358-381, (1970).
19. Ballentine, L.E.: Resource letter IQM-2: Foundations of quantum mechanics since the Bell inequalities, Am. J. Phys. 55, 785-792 (1987).
20. Ballentine, L. E.: Quantum mechanics-a modern development, World Scientific, Singapore, 1998.
21. Barenco, A.: A universal two-bit gate for quantum computation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A449, 679-683 (1995).
22. Barenco, A.: Quantum physics and computers, Contemp. Phys. 37, 375-389 (1996).
23. Barenco, A.: Quantum computation: an introduction, in [LSP 98], p. 143-183 (1998).
24. Barrett, J.: Everett's Relative-State formulation of Quantum Mechanics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-everett, 2000.
25. Bennett, C.H. und Brassard, G.: Quantum key distribution and coin tossing, in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (Bangalore, India, 1984), p. 175-179, IEEE, New York, 1984.
26. Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A. und Wooters, W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and EPR channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895-1899 (1993).
27. Barenco, A., Bennet, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P. W., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A. und Weinfurter, H.: Elementary gates for quantum computation, Phys, Rev. A52, 3457-3467 (1995); quant-ph/9503016.
28. Boschi, B., Branca, S., DeMartini, F. und Hardy, L.: A Ladder Proof of Nonlocality Without Inequalities: Theoretical and Experimental Results, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2755-2758 (1997).
29. Boyer, M., Brassard, G., Høyer, P. und Tapp, A.: Tight bounds on quantum searching, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 493-505 (1998); quant-ph/9605034.
30. Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G. und Mermin, N. D.: Quantum Cryptography without Bell's Theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 557-559 (1992).
31. Bennett, Ch. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A. und Wootters, W. K.: Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722-725 (1996).
32. Berenti, G., Casati, G. und Strini, G.: Principles of Quantum Computation, Vol. I: Basic Concepts, World Scientific, Singapore, 2004.
33. Bennett, Ch. H ., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu und S., Schumacher, B.: Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations, Phys. Review A 53, 2046-2052 (1996).
34. Beltrametti, E. G. und Cassinelli, G.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading 1981.
35. Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, I. und Zoller, P.: Quantencomputer: wie Verschränkung in der Informationsverarbeitung verwendet werden kann, Phys. Blätter 55, Nr. 9, 37-43 (1999).
36. Bennett, Ch. H. und DiVincenzo, D. P.: Quantum information and computation, Nature 404, 247-255 (2000).
37. Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Fuchs, C. A., Mor, T., Rains, E.M., Shor, P. W., Smolin, J. A. und Wooters, W. K.: Quantum nonlocality without entanglement, Phys. Rev. A59, 1070-1091 (1999); quant-ph/9804053. Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication, Physical Review Letters 81, 5932-5935 (1998); /quant-ph/9803056.
38. Berman, G. P., Doolen, G. D., Mainieri, R. und Tsifrinovich, V. I.: Introduction to quantum computers, World Scientific, Singapore, 1998.
39. J. S. Bell: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1, 195-200 (1964). Nachdruck in J. S. Bell Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
40. Bennett, C. H.: Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 3121-3124 (1992).
41. Bennett, C. H.: Quantum Information and Computation, Physics Today, October 24-30 (1995).
42. Berman, P. R.: Atom Interferometry, Academic Press, San Diego, 1997.
43. Bouwmeester, D., Ekert, A. und Zeilinger, A. (Ed.): The physics of quantum information-quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, quantum computation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
44. Blanchard, Ph., Giulini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C. und Stamatescu, J.-O. (Ed.): Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
45. Busch, P., Grabowski, M. und Lahti, P. J.: Operational quantum mechanics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995. Phys. Rev. A 54, 1844-1852 (1996)
46. Bouwmeester, D., Howell, J. C. und Lamas-Linares, A.: Quantum Information Science Using Photons, in [Hei 02], p. 149-197 (2002).
47. Blatt, R.: Quantum information processing: Dream and realization, in [Aud 06], p. 235-270, 2006.
48. Busch, P., Lahti, P. J. und Mittelstaedt, P.: The Quantum Theory of Measurement, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
49. Bohm, D.: Quantum Physics Prentice Hall, New York, 1951.
50. Bohr, N.: Collected Works, Vol. 6, p.296, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
51. Bohm, D. J.: A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables, I and II in Wheeler, J. A. und Zurek, W. H. (eds.): Quantum theory and measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983.
52. Breuer, H.-P. und Petruccione, F.: The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002. Multi-Partial Entanglement, in [BEZ 00] S. 197-209, (2000).
53. Braunstein, P. (Ed.): Quantum computing: Where do we want to go tomorrow, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1999.
54. Braunstein, S.: Quantum Computation, in [Bra 99], p. 1-21, 1999.
55. Brandt, H. E.: Qubit Devices in [Lom 02], S. 67-139 (2002).
56. Brooks, M. (Ed.): Quantum computing and communications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
57. Bruß, D.: Characterizing Entanglement, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4237-4251 (2002), quant-ph/0110078 (2001).
58. Bruß, D.: Quanteninformation, S. Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt a.M., 2003.
59. Bub, J.: Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
60. Bub, J.: Quantum Theory is about Quantum Information, Foundations of Physics, 35, 541-560 (2005).
61. Bub, J.: Quantum Information and Communication, quant-ph/0512125v1.
62. Busch, P.: Is the quantum state (an) observable? in: R.S. Cohen et. Al. (Ed.) Potentiality and Passion-at-a-Distance, S. 61-70, Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1997; quantph/9604014.
63. Busch, P.: Quantum States as Effect Valuations: Giving Operational Content to von Neumann's No-Hidden-Variable Theorem; quant-ph/9909073
64. Busch, P.: Classical versus quantum ontology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33, 517-539 (2002).
65. Bose, S., Vedral, V. und Knight, P. L.: Multiparticle generalization of entanglement swapping, Phys. ReviewA 57, 2, 822-829 (1998); quant-ph/9708004.
66. Braunstein, S.L. und van Loock, P.: Quantum Information with continuos variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513-577 (2005).
67. Bennett, CH. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A. und Wootters, W. K.: Mixedstate entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824-3851 (1996).
68. Bennett, C. und Wiesner, S.: Communication via one-and two particles operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881-2884 (1992).
69. Bertelmann, R. A. und Zeilinger, A. (Ed.): Quantum [un]speakables-From Bell to quantum information, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
70. Cabello, A.: Bibliographic guide to the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information; quant-ph/0012089v12 (2004).
71. Carmichael, H.J.: Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1-Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations, Springer, Berlin, 1999.
72. Chen, G. und Brylinski, R.K. (Ed.): Mathematics of Quantum Computation, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2002.
73. Clifton, R., Bub, J. und Halvorson, H.: Characterizing Quantum Theory in Terms of Information Theoretic Constraints, Found. Phys. 33, 1561-1591 (2003).
74. Caves, C. M. und Drummond, P.D.: Quantum limits on bosonic communication rates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 481-537 (1994).
75. Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B. und Laloë, F.: Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 2005.
76. Cleve, R., Ekert, A., Macchiavello, C. und Mosca, M.: Quantum algorithms revisited, Proc. R. Soc. London, A454, 339-354 (1998).
77. Caves, C. M. und Fuchs, Ch. A.: Quantum Information: How much Information in a State Vektor?; quant-ph/9601025
78. Clauser, J. F. , Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. und Holt, R. A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880-884 (1969).
79. Cirac, J. I.: Quantum Information: Entanglement, Purification, Error Correction and Quantum Optical Implication, in [Hei 02], p. 199-239, 2002.
80. Cory, D. G., Laflamme, R., Knill, E., Viola, L., Havel, T. F., Boulant, N., Boutis, G., Fortunato, E., Lloyd, S., Martinez, R., Negrevergne, C., Pravia, M., Sharf, Y., Teklemariam, G., Weinstein, Y. S. und Zurek, W. H.: NMR based quantum information processing: Achievements and prospects, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 9-11 (Special issue: Experimental proposals for quantum computation), 875-907 (2000); quant-ph/0004104.
81. Carnal, O. und Mlynek, J.: Young's double-slit experiment with atoms: A simple atom interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2689-2692 (1991).
82. Calude, C. S. und Paun, G.: Computing with Cells and Atoms-An Introduction to quantum, DNA and membrane computing, Taylor and Francis, London, 2001.
83. Campos, R. A., Saleh, B. E. A. und Teich, M. C.: Quantum-mechanical lossless beam splitter: SU(2) symmetry and photos statistics, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1371-1384 (1989).
84. Crell, B. und Uhlmann, A.: Einführung in die Grundlagen und Protokolle der Quanteninformatik, www.uni-leipzig.de/ntz/abs/papers/ntz3398.ps
85. D'Espagnat, B.: Veiled reality-an analysis of present-day quantum mechanical concepts, Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.), 1995.
86. D'Espagnat, B.: Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics, Perseus Books, Reading, 1999.
87. Davies, E. B.: Quantum Theory of open systems, Academic Press, New York, 1976.
88. Deutsch, D. und Ekert, A. K.: Quantum computation, Phys.World 11, 53-57 (1998).
89. Deutsch, D., Ekert, A., Josza, R., Macchiavello, C., Popescu, S. und Sanpera, A.: Quantum privacy amplification and the security of quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2818-2821 (1996).
90. Deutsch D.: Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97-117 (1985).
91. Deutsch, D.: Quantum computational networks, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A 425, 73-90 (1989).
92. Deutsch, D.: Comment on the many minds interpretation of quantum mechanics, Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 47, 222 (1996).
93. DeWitt, B. S. und Graham, R. N.: Resource Letter IQM-1 on the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 39, 724-738 (1971).
94. DeWitt, B. S. und Graham, R. N. (Ed.): The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1973.
95. Duan, L.M. und Guo, G.-C.: Probabilistic cloning and identification of linearly independent quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4999-5002 (1998); quant-ph/9804064.
96. Donald, M. J., Horodecki, M. und Rudolph, O.: The uniqueness theorem for entanglement measures; quant-ph/0105017 v2 (2002).
97. Dieks, D.: Communication by EPR Devices, Phys. Lett. A 92, 271-272 (1982).
98. Diósi, L.: Short Course on Quantum Information Theory, An approach from theoretical physics, Springer, Berlin, to appear.
99. DiVincenzo, D. P.: Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1015-1022 (1995); cond-mat/9407022.
100. DiVincenzo, D. P.: Quantum gates and circuits, Proc. R. Soc. London, A 454, 261-276 (1998).
101. DiVincenzo, D. P.: The physical implementation of quantum computation, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 9-11 (Special issue: Experimental proposals for quantum computation), 771-783 (2000); quant-ph/0002077.
102. Deutsch D., Jozsa R.: Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation , Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 439, 553-558 (1992).
103. DeMartini, F. und Monroe, C.: Experimental Quantum Computation and Information, "Enrico Fermi" Course CXLVIII, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2002.
104. Di Giuseppe, G., De Martini, F. und Boschi, D.: Experimental Test of the Violations of Local Realism in Quantum Mechanics without Bell Inequalities, Phys.Rev. A56, 1-6 (1997).
105. Dürr, S., Nonn, T. und Rempe, G.: Fringe visibility and which-way information in an atom interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5705-5709 (1998).
106. Dürr, S. und Rempe, G.: Wave-Particle Duality in an Atom Interferometer, Advances Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 45, 29-71 (2000).
107. Einstein, A., Born, H. und M.: Briefwechsel 1916-1955, Nymphenburgische Verlagsbuchhandlung, München 1969. Reprinted in The Born-Einstein Letters, Walker,New York, 1971.
108. Ekert, A., Gisin, N., Huttner, B., Inamori, H. und Weinfurter, H.: Quantum Cryptography, in [BEZ 00], p. 15-48 (2000).
109. Ekert, A., Hayden, P. M. und Inamori, H.: Basic concepts in quantum computation, in Les Houches, Session LXXII Coherent atomic matter waves, Kaiser, R., Westbrook, C. and David, F. (Ed.), p. 661-701, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
110. Ekert, A. und Jozsa, R.: Quantum computation and Shor's factoring algorithm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 733-753 (1996).
111. Ekert, A. K.: Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661-663 (1991).
112. Eckert,K., Mompart, J., Yi, X. X., Schliemann, J., Bruß, D., Birkl, G. und Lewenstein, M.: Quantum computing in optical microtraps based on the motional states of neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. A66, 042317 (2002).
113. Engler, B.-G.: Remarks on some basic issues in quantum mechanics, Zeitschrift f. Naturforschung 54, 11-32 (1999).
114. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. und Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935).
115. Eckert, K., Schliemann, J., Bruß, D. und Lewenstein, M.: Quantum Correlations in Systems of Indistinguishable Particles, Ann. Phys. 299, 88-127 (2002); quant-ph/020360
116. Esfeld, M.: Einführung in die Naturphilosophie, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 2002.
117. Esfeld, M.: Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations, Stud. Hist. Phil. of Science Part B, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 625-641 (2004).
118. Esfeld, M.: Quantum theory: a challenge for philosophy, in [Aud 06] p. 271-296, 2006.
119. Englert, B.-G., Scully, M. O. und Walther, H.: Quantum erasure in double-slit interferometers with which-way detectors Am. J. Phys. 67, 325-329 (1999).
120. Elizur, A.C. und Vaidman, L.: Quantum Mechanical Interaction-Free Measurements, Found. Phys. 23, 987-997 (1993).
121. Everett, H.: Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454-462 (1957).
122. Fano, U.: Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74-93 (1957)
123. Fischer, H. und Kaul, H.: Mathematik für Physiker Bd. 2: Gewöhnliche und partielle Differentialgleichungen, mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Teubner, Stuttgart, 1998.
124. Fleming, G. N.: Operational Quantum Physics, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 31, 117-125 (2000).
125. Fuchs, C. A. und Peres, A.: Quantum theory needs no interpretation, Physics Today, March 2000, 70-71 sowie Sept. 2000, 11-14, 1990.
126. Friedman, J. R., Patel, V., Chen, W., Tolpygo, S. K. und Lukens, J. E.: Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states, Nature 406, 43-46 (2000).
127. Fuchs, Ch.: Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information, mostly, Journ. mod. Optics 50, 987-1023 (2003); quant-ph/0205039 (2002).
128. Greenberger, D.M., Horne, M. A. und Zeilinger, A.: Going Beyond Bell's Theorem in M. Kafatos (Ed.) Bell Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, S. 69-72, Kluwer, Dosdrecht, 1989.
129. Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A, Shimony, A. und Zeilinger, A.: Bell's Theorem without inequalities, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131-1143 (1990).
130. Giulini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O. und Zeh, D. H.: Decoherence and the appearance of the classical world in quantum theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
131. Gleason, A. M.: Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space, J. Math. Mech. 6, 885-894 (1957)
132. Galindo, A. und Martín-Delgado, M. A.: Information and computation: Classical and quantum aspects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 347-423 (2002), quant-ph/0112105.
133. Griffiths, R. B.: Consistent Quantum Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2002.
134. Grover, L. K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, p. 212-219, Philadelphia, 1996.
135. Gisin, N., Rikordy, G., Tittel, W. und Zbinder, H.: Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145-195 (2002).
136. Gruska, J.: Quantum Computing, McGraw-Hill, London, 1999.
137. Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. und Weber, T.: Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems, Phys. Rev. D34, 470-491 (1986).
138. Hughes, R. J., Alde, D. M., Dyer, P., Luther, G. G., Morgan, G. L. und Schauer, M.: Quantum Cryptography, Contemp. Phys. 36, 149-163 (1995); quant-ph/9504002.
139. Hardy, L.: Why Quantum Theory?; quant-ph/011068v1 (2001).
140. Hardy, L.: Quantum Theory from five reasonable Axioms; quant-ph/0101012v4 (2001).
141. Hardy, L.: Quantum Dynamics, Realistic Theories and Lorentz-Invariant Realistic Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981-2984 (1992).
142. Hardy, L.: Nonlocality for Two Particles without Inequalities for Almost All Entangled States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1665-1668 (1993).
143. Hardy, L.: Spooky action at a distance in quantum mechanics Contemp. Physics, 39, 419-429 (1998).
144. Horodecki, P. und Ekert, A.K.: Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 127-902 (2002).
145. Healey, R.: Holism and Nonseperability in Physics, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Physics, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-holism.
146. Heiss, D. (Ed.): Fundamentals of Quantum Information, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
147. Held, C.: The Bohr-Einstein debate and the fundamental problem of quantum mechanics, in [Aud 06], p. 65-90, 2006.
148. Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P. und Horodecki, R.: Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1-8 (1996); quant-ph/9605038.
149. Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P. und Horodecki, R.: Mixed State entanglement and Quantum Communication, in [ABH 01], p. 151-195, 2001.
150. Hirsenvalo, M.: Quantum computing, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
151. Hellwig, H.-E. und Kraus, K.: Pure operations and measurements, Comm. math. Phys. 11, 214-220 (1969).
152. Hellwig, H.-E. und Kraus, K.: Operations and measurements, Comm. math. Phys. 16, 142-147 (1970).
153. Hughes, R. und Nordholdt, J.: Quantum cryptography takes to the air, Physics World, May, 31-35 (1999).
154. Holevo, A. S.: Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
155. Home, D.: Conceptual foundations of quantum physics-an overview from modern perspective, Plenum Press, New York, 1977.
156. Haroche, S., Raimond, J. M. und Brune, M.: Entanglement, complementority and decoherence in cavity QED experiments, in [DM 02], p. 3-36, 2002.
157. Home, D. und Selleri, F.: Bell's Theorem and the EPR Paradox, Riv.Nuov. Cim. 14, n9. 1-95 (1991).
158. Hackermüller, L., Uttenthaler, S., Hornberger, K., Reiger, E., Brezger, B., Zeilinger, A. und Arndt, M.: Wave Nature of Biomolecules and Flourofullerenes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090408-1-09048-4 (2003).
159. Hardy, G. und Wright, E.: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979.
160. Hill, S. und Wooters, W. K.:Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022-5025 (1997).
161. Hellmuth, T., Walther, H., Zajonc, A. und Schleich, W.: Delayed-choice experiments in quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2532-2541 (1987).
162. Herzog, T. J., Kwiat, P. G.,Weinfurter, H. und Zeilinger, A.:Complementarity and the Quantum Eraser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3034-3037 (1995).
163. Itano, W. H., Heinzen, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., und Wineland, D. J.: Quantum Zeno Effect, Phys. Rev. A41, 2295-2300 (1990).
164. Isham, C.: Lectures on quantum theory-mathematical and structural foundations, Imperial College Press, distributed by World Scientific, Singapore, 1995.
165. Joos, E.: Decoherence Through Interaction with the Enviroment, in [GJK 96], p. 35-136, 1996.
166. Joos, E.: Decoherence and the transition from quantum physics to classical physics, in [Aud 06], p. 203-233, 2006.
167. Jordan, Th. F.: Linear Operators for Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, New York, 1969.
168. Jozsa, R.: Quantum Information and its Properties, in [LSP 98], p. 49-75 (1998).
169. Jozsa, R.: Quantum Algorithms, in The Physics of Quantum Information, in [BEZ 00], p. 104-126, 2000.
170. Jozsa, R.: An introduction to measurement based quantum computation; quantph/0508124.
171. Jozsa, R. und Schumacher, B.: A new proof of the quantum noiseless coding theorem, J. of Mod. Optics 41, 2343-2349 (1994).
172. Keyl,M.: Fundamentals of quantum information theory, Physics Reports 369, 431-548 (2002).
173. Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Barnum, D., Dalvit, D., Dziarmaga, J., Gubernatis, L., Gurvits, L., Ortiz, G., Viola, L. und Zurek, W. H.: Introduction to quantum Information Processing; quant-ph/0207171 v1, 2002.
174. Küblbeck, J. K. und Müller, R.: Die Wesenszüge der Quantenphysik-Modelle, Bilder, Experimente, Aulis Verlag Deubner, Köln, 2002.
175. Konrad, Th.: On the theory and application of weak and unsharp measurements in Quantum Mechanics, Doctoral thesis, University of Konstanz 2003, http://www.ub.unikonstanz. de/kops/volltexte/2003/1050/.
176. Kraus, K.: States, Effects and Operations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.
177. Konrad, Th., Scherer, A., Nock, M. und Audretsch, J.: Heralded single-photon generation using imperfect single-photon sources and a two-photon absorbing medium, Phys. Rev. A73, 032327 (2006); quant-ph/0602225.
178. Kitaev, A. Y., Shen, A. H. und Vyalyi, M. N.: Classical and Quantum Computation, Amer. Math. Society, Providence, 2002.
179. Kwiat, P. G., White, A. G., Mitchell, J. R., Nairz, O., Weihs, G., Weinfurter, H. und Zeilinger, A.:High-Efficiency Quantum InterrogationMeasurement via the Quantum Zeno Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4725-4728 (1999).
180. Laloë, F.: Do we really understand quantum mechanics? Strange correlations, paradoxes and theorems, Am. J. Phys. 69, 655-701 (2001).
181. Lomonaco, S. J. und Brandt, H. E. (Ed.): Quantum computation and information, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2002.
182. Leuchs, G. und Beth, T. (Ed.): Quantum Information Processing,Wiley-VCH,Weinheim, 2003.
183. London, F. und Bauer, E.: La théorie de l'observation en mécanique quantique, Hermann, Paris (1939).
184. English translation: The theory of observation in quantum mechanics, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 217-259, ed. by Wheeler, J. A., Zurek, W. H., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983.
185. Lewenstein, M., Bruß, D., Cirac, J. I., Kraus, B., Kús, M., Samsonowicz, J., Sanpera, A. und Tarrach, R.: Separability and distillability in composite quantum systems-a primer, J. Mod. Opt. 77, 2481-2499 (2000); quant-ph/0006064.
186. Lütkenhaus, N., Calsamiglia, J. und Suominen, K.: Bell measurements for teleportation, Phys. Rev. A59, 3295-3300 (1999).
187. Loss, D. und DiVincenzo, D. P.: Quantum computation with quantum dots, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120-126 (1998); cond-mat/9701055.
188. LeLe Bellac, M.: A Short Introduction to Quantum Information and Quantum Computing, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2006.
189. Leggett, A. J.: Qubits, Cbits, Decoherence, Quantum Measurement and Enviroment, in [Hei 02], p. 3-45, 2002.
190. Legget, A. J.: Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, R415-R451 (2002).
191. Linden, N., Massar, S. und Popescu, S.: Purifying noisy entanglement requires collective measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3279-3282 (1998); quant-ph/9805001.
192. Lomonaco, S. J., (Ed.): Quantum computation: A Grand mathematical challenge for the twenty-first century and the millenium, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 2002.
193. Lomonaco, S. J.: Rosetta stone for Quantum Mechanics with an Introduction to Quantum Computation Version 1.5, in [Lom 02], S. 3-65, 2002; quant-ph/0007045v1.
194. Lo, H.-K., Spiller, T. und Popescu, S. (Ed.): Introduction to Quantum Computing and Information, World Scientific, Singapore 1998.
195. Ludwig, G.: Zur Deutung der Beobachtung in der Quantenmechanik, Phys. Bl. 11, 489-494 (1955).
196. Ludwig, G.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.
197. Ludwig, G.: An Axiomatic Basis for Quantum Mechanics, Vol 1, Springer, Berlin, 1985.
198. Ludwig, G.: Atoms: Are they real or are they objects, Found. of Physics 19, 971-983 (1989).
199. Ludwig, G.: Concepts of States in Physics, Found. of Phys. 20, 621-633 (1990).
200. Ludwig, G.: Die Katze ist tot in [AM 96], p. 183-208, 1996.
201. Lidar, D. A. und Whaley, K. B.: Decoherence-Free Subspaces and Subsystems in Irreversible Quantum Dynamics, Benatti, F. und Floreanini (Ed.), p. 83-120, Springer, Berlin, 2003; quant-ph/0301032.
202. Mainzer, K.: Naturphilosophie und Quantenmechanik in [AM 96], S. 245-299, 1996.
203. Marlow, A. R. (Ed.): Mathematical Foundation of Quantum Theory, Academic Press, NY, 1978.
204. Mintert, F., Carvalho, A.R.R., Kuas, M. und Buchleitner, A.: Measures and dynamics of entangled states; quant-ph/0505162 (2005).
205. Merton, R. K.: On the shoulders of Giants, Free Press, New York, 1965.
206. Mertens, S.: Computational Complexity for Physicists, Computing in Science and Engineering 4, 31-47 (2002); cond-mat/0012185v2.
207. Mittelstaedt, P.: Quantum logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978.
208. Mittelstaedt, P.: Objektivität und Realität in der Quantenphysik, in [AM 96]. p. 125-155, 1996.
209. Mittelstaedt, P.: The interpretation of quantum mechanics and the measurement process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
210. Marinescu, D. C. und Marinescu, G. M.: Approaching Quantum Computing, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2005.
211. Mutschler, H.-D.: Die Welt als Konstruktion in Magerl, G. und Komarek, K. (Ed.) Virtualität und Realität: Bild und Wirklichkeit der Naturwissenschaften,Wien, 1998.
212. Mandel, L. und Wolf, E.: Optical coherence and quantum optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
213. Mahler, G. und Weberruß, V. A.: Quantum networks-dynamics of open nanostructures, 2 ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
214. Nielsen, M. A. und Chuang, I. L.: Quantum Computation and quantum information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
215. Nielsen, M. A., Caves, C. M., Schumacher, B. und Barnum, H.: Informationtheoretic approack to quantum error correction and reversible measurement; Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 277-304 (1998), quant-ph/9706064.
216. Namiki, M., Pascazio, S. und Nakazato, H.: Decoherence and quantum measurements, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997.
217. Omnès, R.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994.
218. Passon, O.:Why isn't every physicist a Bohmian?; quant-ph/0412119v2.
219. Pellizzari, T.: Quantum computers, Error-correction and networking: Quantum optical approaches, in [LSP 98], p. 270-310, 1998.
220. Peres, A.: Neumark's Theorem on Quantum Inseparability, Found. Phys. 20, 1441-1453 (1990).
221. Peres, A.: Quantum theory-concepts and methods, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.
222. Peres, A.: Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413-1415 (1996); quant-ph/9604005.
223. Petersen, A.: The Philosophy of Nils Bohr, Bull. Of the Atomic Scientists, 19, 8-14 (1963).
224. Pittenger, A. O.: An Introduction to Quantum Computing Algorithms, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2000.
225. Paris, M. G. A. und Rěháček, J.: Quantum State Estimation, Springer, Heidelberg, 2004.
226. Preskill, J.: Course Informations for Physics 219/Computer Science 219 Quantum Computation (Formerly Physics 229), California Institute of Technology, 1998, http://www.theory.Caltech.edu/preskill/ph229.
227. Preskill, J.: Fault-tolerant quantum computation, in [LSP 98], p. 213-269, 1998; quant-ph/9712048.
228. Preskill, J.: Battling decoherence: The fault-tolerant quantum computer, Phys. Today 52, 6, 24, 30 (1999).
229. Primas, H.: Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
230. Palma, G. M., Suominen, K. und Ekert, A. K.: Quantum computers and dissipation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 452, 567-584 (1996).
231. Prasad, S., Scully,M. O. und Martienssen,W.: A Quantum Description of the Beam Splitter, Optics Communications 62, 139-145, (1987).
232. Peres, A. und Terno, D. R.: Quantum information and relativity theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 93-123 (2004).
233. Plenio, M. B. und Vedral V.: Teleportation, entanglement and thermodynamics in the quantum world, Contemporary Physics 39, 431-446 (1998).
234. Plenio, M. B., Vedral, V. und Knight, P. L.: Computers and communication in the quantum world, Phys.World 9, 10, 19-20 (1996).
235. Paz, J. P. und Zurek, W. H.: Enviroment-Induced Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical in [Hei 02], p. 77-148, 1902.
236. Raimond, J.M., Brune, M. und Haroche, S.: Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565-582 (2001).
237. Rempe, G.: Entangled quantum systems: from wave-particle duality to singlephoton sources of light, in [Aud 06], p. 113-141, 2006.
238. Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, M., Monroe, C. und Wineland, D. J.: Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection, Nature 409, 791-794(2001).
239. Rieffel, E. und Polak, W.: An Introduction to Quantum Computing for Non-Physicists; quant-ph/98090 v2 (2002).
240. Rauch, H. und Werner, S.A.: Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.
241. Sakurai, Jun John: Modern Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1985.
242. Schrödinger, E.: Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmecha, Naturwissenschaften 23, S. 807-812, S. 823-828, S. 844-849 (1935)
243. Scheibe, E.: Die kontingenten Aussagen in der Physik. Axiomatische Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der klassischen Physik und der Quantentheorie, Frankfurt, 1964.
244. Schröter, J.: Das L-Konzept physikalischer Theorien, Praxis der Naturwissenschaften-Physik 39, Heft 2, 20-27 (1990).
245. Schumacher, B.: Quantum coding, Phys. Rev. A51, 2738-2747 (1995)
246. Schröter, J.: Zur Meta-Theory der Physik, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996.
247. Schumacher, B.: Sending entanglement through noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614-2628 (1996).
248. Schlosshauer, M.: Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267-1305 (2004).
249. Schlosshauer, M.: Experimental motivation and empirical consistency in minimal non-collapse quantum mechanics; quant-ph/0506199 (2005).
250. Seevinck, M. P.: Holism, physical theories and quantum mechanics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 693-712 (2004).
251. Steeb, W.-H. und Hardy, Y.: Problems and solutions in quantum computing and quantum information, World Scientific, Singapore, 2004.
252. Shannon, C. E.: A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Tech. J. 27, 379-423, 623-656 (1948).
253. Shannon, C. E.: Communication theory of secrecystems, Bell Systems Technical Journal 28, 656-715 (1949).
254. Shimony, A.: Role of the observer in quantum theory, Am. J. Phys. 31, 755-773 (1963).
255. Shor, P. W.: Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring, in Goldwasser, S. (Ed.): Proc. of the 35th Annual Symp. on the Foundations of Computer Science (Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1994), IEEE Computer Science Society Press, Los Alamitos, California, 1994, p. 124-134.
256. Shor, P.W.: Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. J. Comp. 26, 1484-1509 (1997); quant-ph/9508027.
257. Scarani, V., Iblisdir, S., Gisin, N. und Acin, A.: Quantum cloning, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1225-1256 (2005).
258. Stolze, J. und Suter, D.: Quantum Computing-A Short Course from Theory to Experiment, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004.
259. Stenholm, S. und Suominen, K.-A.: Quantum approach to informatics,Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 2005.
260. Scherer, A., Soklakov, A. N. und Schack, R.: A simple necessary decoherence condition for a set of histories, Phys. Lett. A 326, 307-314 (2004).
261. Stapp, H. P.: A quantum theory of the mind-brain interfac, in Mind, Matter, and Quantum Mechanics, 145-172, Springer, Berlin, 1993.
262. Stamatescu, I.-O.: Stochastic Collapse Modells, in [GJK 96], p. 249-267 (1996).
263. Steane, A. M.: Quantum computing, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 117-173 (1998); quantph/9708022.
264. Torgerson, J. R., Branning, D., Monken, C. H. und Mandel, L.: Experimental Demonstration of the Violation of Local Realism Without Bell Inequalities, Phys. Lett. A204, 323-328 (1995).
265. Terhal, B. M.: Detecting Quantum Entanglement, quant-ph/0101032 v1, (2001) und Journal of Theoretical Computer Science 287, 313-335 (2002).
266. Vaidman, L.: The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Physics, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries, 2001.
267. Vaidman, L.: The Meaning of the Interaction-Free Measurements, Found. Phys. 33, 491-510 (2003); quant-ph/0103081.
268. Vandersypen, L.M.K.: NMR techniques for quantum control and computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1037 (2004).
269. Vdvan der Wal, C. H., ter Haar, A. C. J., Wilhelm, F. K., Schouten, R. N., Harmans, C. J. P. M., Orlando, T. P., Lloyd, S. und Mooij, J. E.: Quantum superposition of macroscopic persistent-current states, Science 290, 5492, p. 773-777 (2000).
270. Vedral, V.M: The role of relative entropie in quantum information theory, Rev.Mod. Phys. 74, 197-234 (2002)
271. Vernam, G. S.: Cipher printing telegraph systems for secret wire and radio telegraphic communication, J. Am. Just. Electr. Eng. 45, 109-115 (1926).
272. Van Loock, P.: Quantum Communication with Continuous Variables, Fortschr. Phys. 50, 1177-1372 (2002).
273. von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1968.
274. Vedral, V. und Plenio, M. B.: Basics of quantum computation ; quant-ph/9802065.
275. Vedral, V., Rippin, M. A. und Plenio, M. B., Quantum correlations, local interactions and error correction, J. of Mod. Optics 44, 2185-2205 (1997).
276. Vojta, G. und Vojta, M.: Teubner Taschenbuch der statistischen Physik, Teubner, Stuttgart, 2000.
277. Williams, C. P. und Clearwater, S. H.: Explorations in quantum computing, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
278. Wehrl, A.: General properties of entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 221-260 (1978).
279. Weinfurter, H.: Quantum information, in [Aud 06], p. 143-168, 2006.
280. Werner, R. F.: Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Review A 40, 4277-4281 (1989).
281. Werner, R. F.: Quantum Information Theory-an Invitation, in [ABH 01], p. 14-57.
282. Werner, R.F.: Quantum computers-the new generation of supercomputers, in [Aud 06], p. 169-201, 2006.
283. Walgate, J. und Hardy, L.: Nonlocality, asymmetry and distinguisihing bipartite states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147901 (2002); quant-ph/0202034.
284. Wheeler, J. A.: The 'Past' and the 'Delayed Choice' Double Slit Experiment, in [Mar 78], p. 9-48, 1978.
285. Wheeler, J. A.: Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links in Zurek, W. H. (Ed.): Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, S. 3-28, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1990.
286. Wiesner, S.: Conjugate coding, Sigact news, 15 (1), 78-88 (1982).
287. White, A. G., Mitchell, J. R., Nairz, O. und Kwiat, P. G.: "Interaction-free" imaging, Phys. Rev. A58, 605-613 (1998); quant-ph/9803060.
288. Wootters, W. K.: Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245-2248 (1998); quant-ph/970929.
289. Wootters, W. K.: Entanglement of formation and concurrence, Quant. Inf. Comp. 1, 27-44 (2001).
290. Walgate, J., Short, A. J., Hardy, L. und Vedral, V.: Local distinguishability of multipartite orthogonal quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972-4975 (2000); quantph/0007098.
291. Werner, R. F. und Wolf, M. M.: Bell's inequalities for states with positive partial transpose, Phys. Rev. A61, 062102 (2000); quant-ph/9910063.
292. Werner, R. F. und Wolf, M. M.: Bell Inequalities and Entanglement, Quantum Information and Computation 1, 1-25 (2001).
293. Wootters, W.K. und Zurek, W.H.: A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature 299, 802-803 (1982).
294. Zbinden, H.: Experimental Quantum Cryptography, in [LSP 98], p. 120-142, (1998).
295. Zeh, H. D.: On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory, Found. Phys. 1, 69-76 (1970).
296. Zeh, H. D.: The Program of Decoherence: Ideas and Concepts, in [GJK 96], p. 5-34 (1996).
297. Zeh, H. D.: The Meaning of Decoherence, in [BGJ 00] p. 19-42, (2000).
298. Zeilinger, A.: General properties of lossless beam splitters in interferometry, Am. J. Phys. 49, 882-883 (1981).
299. Zurek, W. H.: Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?, Phys. Rev. D24, 1516-1525 (1981).
300. Zurek, W. H.: Environment-induced superselection rules, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862-1880 (1982).
301. Zurek, W. H.: Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, Phys. Today 44, 10, 36-44 (1991).
302. Zurek,W. H.: Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical-Revisited, Los Alamos Science, Nr. 27, 2-25 (2002).
303. Zurek, W. H.: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715-775 (2003).
304. Zukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M. A. und Eckert, A. K.:"Event-ready detectors" Bell experiment via entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287-4290 (1993).