Analysis of Behavioral Streams

Handbook of Research Methods in Developmental Science

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 394-420

  Bakeman, Roger ^a   Deckner, Deborah F ^a   Quera, Vicenç ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Behavioral analysis; Coding scheme; Computer program; Coordinated joint engagement; Symbol engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889364093     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470756676.ch20     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Adamson, L. B. & Bakeman, R. (1984). Mothers' communicative actions: Changes during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 467-78.
2. Adamson, L. B. & Bakeman, R. (1991). The development of shared attention in infancy. In R. Vasta (ed.), Annals of Child Development (vol. 8, pp. 1-41). London: Kingsley.
3. Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., Deckner, D. F., & Dunbar, B. (2000). A developmental perspective on the joint attention deficit in autism. In M. Harris (chair), Typical and atypical pathways to symbolic communication. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Brighton, July.
4. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227-67.
5. Bakeman, R. (2000a). Behavioral observations and coding. In H. T. Reis & C. K. Judd (eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 138-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bakeman, R. (2000b). VitcVert: A program for converting James Long Company data files to SDIS files (tech. rep. no. 16). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University, Developmental Psychology Laboratory.
7. Bakeman, R. & Adamson, L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant interaction. Child Development, 55, 1278-89.
8. Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (1995a). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (1995b). Log-linear approaches to lag-sequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 272-84.
11. Bakeman, R. & Quera, V. (2000). OTS: A program for converting Noldus observer data files to SDIS files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 207-12.
12. Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., Konner, M., & Barr, R. (1990). !Kung infancy: The social context of object exploration. Child Development, 61, 794-809.
13. Brazelton, T. B. (1973). Neonatal behavior assessment scale. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
14. Cohen, J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
15. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-20.
16. Deckner, D. F., Adamson, L. B., & Bakeman, R. (2003). Rhythm in mother-infant interactions. Infancy, 4, 201-17.
17. Emerson, E., Reeves, D. J., & Felce, D. (2000). Palmtop computers for behavioral observation research. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. J. Symons (eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 47-59). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
18. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
19. Kahng, S. W. & Iwata, B. A. (2000). Computer systems for collecting real-time observation data. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. J. Symons (eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 35-45). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
20. Konner, M. J. (1976). Maternal care, infant behavior, and development among the !Kung. In R. B. DeVore (eds.), Kalahari hunter-gathers (pp. 218-45). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Lavelli, M. & Poli, M. (1998). Early mother-infant interaction during breast- and bottle-feeding. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 667-84.
22. Long, J. (1996). Video coding system reference guide. Caroga Lake, NY: James Long Company.
23. Martin, N., Oliver, C., & Hall, S. (1999). ObsWin: Observational data collection and analysis for Windows. CTI Psychology Software News, 9, 14-16.
24. Noldus, L. P. J. J., Trienes, R. J. H., Henriksen, A. H. M., Jansen, H., & Jansen, R. G. (2000). The Observer Video-Pro: New software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 197-206.
25. Parten, M. B. (1932). Social participation among preschool children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243-69.
26. Quera, V. & Bakeman R. (2000). Quantification strategies in behavioral observation research. In Thompson, T., Felce, D., & Symons, F. J. (eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities. (pp. 297-315). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
27. Robinson, B. F. & Bakeman, R. (1998). ComKappa: A Windows 95 program for calculating kappa and related statistics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 731-2.
28. Sackett, G. P. (1978). Measurement in observational research. In G. P. Sackett (ed.), Observing behavior, vol. 2: Data collection and analysis methods (pp. 25-43). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
29. Sackett, G. P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. D. Osofsky (ed.), Handbook of infant development (pp. 623-49). New York: John Wiley.
30. Tapp, J. & Walden, T. (1993). PROCODER: A professional tape control coding and analysis system for behavioral research using videotape. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 53-6.
31. Wickens, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Wolff, P. (1966). The causes, controls, and organization of the neonate. Psychological Issues, 5(17), special issue.