Social Cognition and the Normality of Prejudgment

On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 36-53

  Fiske, Susan T ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Between group differences; Cognitive revolution; Prejudgment; Social cognition; Social motives

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889357641     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470773963.ch3     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
2. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253-67.
3. Brewer, M. B. & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 554-94). New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
5. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 504-53). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (under review). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.
7. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., et al. (under review). Toward pancultural principles of stereotyping.
8. Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105-16.
9. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
10. Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
11. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 33, pp. 41-113). New York: Academic Press.
12. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Fiske, S. T. (2000). Interdependence and the reduction of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. (pp. 115-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. New York: Wiley.
15. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
16. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M. H., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The Continuum Model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. (pp. 231-54). New York: Guilford.
17. Fiske, S. T. & Ruscher, J. B. (1993). Negative interdependence and prejudice: Whence the affect? In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 239-68). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
19. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-91.
21. Gaertner, S. L. & McLaughlin, J. P. (1983). Racial stereotypes: Associations and ascriptions of positive and negative characteristics. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 23-30.
22. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 33, pp. 115-88). New York: Academic Press.
23. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
24. Harris, L. T. & Fiske, S. T. (2003). Unpublished data, Princeton University.
25. Hart, A. J., Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Fischer, H., & Rauch, S. L. (2000). Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs. ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11, 2351-5.
26. Hewstone, M. (1990). The "ultimate attribution error"? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-35.
27. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-93.
28. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-16.
29. Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-84.
30. Mummendey, A. & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (eds.) European Review of Social Psychology (vol. 9, pp. 108-43). New York: Wiley.
31. Neuberg, S. L., Smith, D. M., & Asher, T. (2000). Why people stigmatize: Toward a biocultural framework. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (eds.), The social psychology of stigma. (pp. 31-61). New York: Guilford.
32. Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 47-62.
33. Otten, S. & Bar-Tal, Y. (2002). Selfanchoring in the minimal group paradigm: The impact of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 267-84.
34. Otten, S. & Wentura, D. (2001). Selfanchoring and in-group favoritism: An individual profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525-32.
35. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-92.
36. Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-76.
37. Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729-38.
38. Richeson, J. A. & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287-90.
39. Rojahn, K. & Pettigrew, T. F. (1992). Memory for schema-relevant information: A meta-analytic resolution. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 81-109.
40. Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D., & Gary, M. L. (2001). "Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856-68.
41. Ruscher, J. B. (2001). Prejudiced communication: A social psychological perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
42. Saenz, D. S. (1994). Token status and problem-solving deficits: Detrimental effects of distinctiveness and performance monitoring. Social Cognition, 12, 61-74.
43. Schaller, M. & Conway, L. G. (2001). From cognition to culture: The origins of stereotypes that really matter. In G. B. Moskowitz (ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition. (pp. 163-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Shelton, J. N. (2003). Interpersonal concerns in social encounters between majority and minority group members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 171-85.
45. Simon, B. (1992). Intragroup differentiation in terms of ingroup and outgroup attributes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 407-13.
46. Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Plenum series in social/clinical psychology. (pp. 173-200). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
47. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural world views. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 24, pp. 93-159). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48. Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Wolfe, C. T., Fong, C., & Dunn, M. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139-52.
49. Stangor, C. & Crandall, C. S. (2000). Threat and the social construction of stigma. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (eds.), The social psychology of stigma. New York: Guilford.
50. Stangor, C. & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent social information: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
51. Stephan, W. G. & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Swim, J. K. & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507-19.
53. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(2), 96-102.
54. Talaska, C. A., Fiske, S. T., & Chaiken, S. (2004). Predicting discrimination: A meta-analysis of the racial attitudesbehavior literature. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
55. Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. (pp. 83-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-93.
57. Vorauer, J. & Kumhyr, S. M. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self-versus other-directed judgments and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706-19.
58. Wheeler, M. E. & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Controlling racial prejudice: Socialcognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychological Science, 16, 56-63.
59. Wilder, D. A. & Shapiro, P. (1989). The role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an outgroup member. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 60-9.
60. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-71.
61. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815-27.