A comparison of native ATM-Multicast to IP-multicast with emphasis on mapping between the two

Proceedings of the 27th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, SSST 1995

Volumn , Issue , 1995, Pages 189-193

  Bagwell, Richard T ^a   McDearman, Jon R ^a   Marlow, David T ^b  

^a TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; MULTICASTING; OVERLAY NETWORKS; SYSTEM THEORY; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

CURRENT TECHNOLOGY; FUTURE ATMS; IP MULTICAST; IP PROTOCOL; NETWORKING PROTOCOLS; NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 84889342300     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SSST.1995.390586     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. G. Armitage, “IP Multicast over UNI 3.0 based ATM Networks”, IETF IP over ATM Working Group Draft,Oct 3,1994.
2. ATM User-Network Interface Swcification V3.O, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993
3. R. Bubenik, P. Flugstad, “Leaf Initiated Join Extensions”, ATM Forum draft document # 94-0325R1, July 18, 1994. *
4. S. Deering, “HostExtensions for IP Multicasting”, IETF Network Working Group Request for Comments (RFC1112), Aug. 1989.
5. J.M.S. Doar,Multicast in the Asynchronous Transfer Mode Environment, University of Cambridge, St. John’s College, Jan 1993.
6. M. Laubach, “Classical IP and AFV over ATM”, IETF Network Working Group Request for Comments (RFC1577), Jan. 1994.
7. F. Liaw, D. Perkins, “UNI Procedures and ATM Group Addresses” ATM Forum draft document 94-0685R1, Sept. 26, 1994. *