Gender and Leadership in the Corporate World: A Multiperspective Model

Women and Leadership: Transforming Visions and Diverse Voices

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 106-124

  Korabik, Karen ^a   Ayman, Roya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate world; Intrapsychic process; Leadership; Multiperspective model; Women leaders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889341144     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470692332.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Atwater, L. E., Brett, J. F., Waldman, D., DiMare, L., & Hayden, M. V. (2004). Men's and women's perceptions of gender typing of management subroles. Sex Roles, 50, 191-199.
2. Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
3. Ayman, R. (1993). Leadership perception: The role of gender and culture. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 137-166). New York: Academic Press.
4. Ayman, R. (2004). Situational and contingency approaches to leadership. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 148-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Ayman, R., Korabik, K., & Morris, S. (2006). The gender composition of the leader-subordinate dyad as a moderator of the relationship between the leader's transformational leadership, contingency reward and performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Ayman, R., Rinchiuso, M., & Korabik, K. (2004, August). LMX, satisfaction, and organizational commitment in Canadian organizations: The moderating effect of dyad gender composition. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress of Psychology, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
7. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York:The Free Press.
8. Becker, J., Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2002). Discrepancies in self/subordinates' perceptions of leadership behaviors: Leader's gender, organizational context, and leader's self-monitoring. Group and Organization Management, 27, 226-244.
9. Berry, J. W. (1983). Acculturation: A comparative analysis of alternative forms. In R. J. Samuda & A. L. Woods (Eds.), Perspectives on immigrant and minority education (pp. 66-77). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
10. Cook, E. P. (1985). Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon.
11. Cox, T. Jr. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
12. Day, D., Scheicher, D. J., Unckless, A. L., & Hiller, N. J. (2002). Selfmonitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 390-401.
13. Eagly, A., & Carli, L. (2003). The female leader advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834.
14. Eagly, A., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569-591.
15. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
16. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
17. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
18. Eunjung Cha, A. (February, 2005). Hewlett-Packard forces celebrity CEO to quit. Washington Post. Retrieved August 2, 2006 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10295-2005Feb9.html
19. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader member exchange theory: Correlate and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
20. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership:Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multilevel multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
21. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership:A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
22. Korabik, K. (1990). Androgyny and leadership style. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 9-18.
23. Korabik, K. (1992, June). The masculinization of women managers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec City, Quebec.
24. Korabik, K. (1996). Gender, leadership style, and managerial effectiveness. Proceedings of the International Association of Management. Toronto, ON.
25. Korabik, K. (1997). Applied gender issues. In S. W. Sadava & D. R. Mc Creary (Eds.), Applied social psychology (pp. 292-302). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Korabik, K. (1999). Sex and gender in the new millennium. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender in organizations (pp. 3-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1987, August). Androgyny and leadership style: A conceptual synthesis. New York: American Psychological Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED291-032).
28. Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1989a). Should women managers have to act like men? Journal of Management Development, 8, 23-32.
29. Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1989b). Androgyny and managerial effectiveness. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Annual Conference: Women in management (pp. 1-9). Montreal, QC.
30. Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1990, July). Gender and leadership: An acculturation model. 22nd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Kyoto, Japan.
31. Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (1994, July). Sex-role orientation and self-perception of managerial ability. 23rd International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.
32. Korabik, K., Ayman, R., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2001, June). Gender-role orientation and transformational leadership. Paper presented at Conference on Gender, Work, and Organizations, Keele University, UK.
33. Perry, E. L., Davis-Blake, A., & Kulik, C. T. (1994). Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Academy of Management Review, 19, 786-820.
34. Powell, G. N. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of gender and work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Ridgeway, C. L. (Ed.) (1992). Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York:Springer-Verlag.
36. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barrier to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.
37. Seller, P. (October, 2004). eBay's secret. Fortune, 160-178.
38. Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring:Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.
39. Speron, E., Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2000, April). Self and subordinate agreement on leader performance: Leader's gender, organizational type, and leader's selfmonitoring. Paper presented at 15th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
40. Stephens, H. E. (2004). Gender-role orientation and leadership effectiveness. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON.
41. Zugec, L., & Korabik, K. (2003, June). Multiple intelligences, leadership, and androgyny. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Hamilton, ON.