Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: Analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 924-930

  Lee, Christoph I ^a,b,c   Bensink, Mark E ^b   Berry, Kristin ^b   Musa, Zahra ^b   Bodnar, Carolyn ^d   Dann, Robert ^d   Jarvik, Jeffrey G ^a,c   Lehman, Constance D ^a,b   Ramsey, Scott D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d GE HEALTHCARE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

abnormal mammographic results; breast biopsy; false positive mammographic results; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ABNORMAL MAMMOGRAPHIC RESULTS; BREAST BIOPSY; FALSE-POSITIVE MAMMOGRAPHIC RESULTS; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES; WASHINGTON;

EID: 84889264836     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: 1558349X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. H.D. Nelson, K. Tyne, A. Naik, C. Bougatsos, B.K. Chan, and L. Humphrey Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 151 2009 727 737
2. US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement Ann Intern Med 151 2009 716 726
3. J.G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C.D. Lehman, and S.W. Fletcher Screening for breast cancer JAMA 293 2005 1245 1256
4. J.G. Elmore, C.Y. Nakano, T.D. Koepsell, L.M. Desnick, C.J. D'Orsi, and D.F. Ransohoff International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs J Natl Cancer Inst 95 2003 1384 1393
5. J. Chubak, D.M. Boudreau, P.A. Fishman, and J.G. Elmore Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms Med Care 48 2010 815 820
6. D.L. Weaver, R.D. Rosenberg, and W.E. Barlow Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography Cancer 106 2006 732 742
7. E.F. Petricoin, K.C. Zoon, E.C. Kohn, J.C. Barrett, and L.A. Liotta Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality Nat Rev Drug Discov 1 2002 683 695
8. D.F. Ransohoff Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer N Engl J Med 348 2003 1715 1717
9. M.F. Templin, D. Stoll, M. Schrenk, P.C. Traub, C.F. Vohringer, and T.O. Joos Protein microarray technology Drug Discov Today 7 2002 815 822
10. L.A. Liotta, and E.C. Kohn The microenvironment of the tumour-host interface Nature 411 2001 375 379
11. K.P. Pritzker Cancer biomarkers: easier said than done Clin Chem 48 2002 1147 1150
12. S. Srivastava, and R. Gopal-Srivastava Biomarkers in cancer screening: a public health perspective J Nutr 132 suppl 2002 2471S 2475S
13. V.G. De Gruttola, P. Clax, and D.L. DeMets Considerations in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop Control Clin Trials 22 2001 485 502
14. Institute of Medicine Saving women's lives: strategies for improving breast cancer detection and diagnosis 2005 National Academies Press Washington, District of Columbia
15. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Outpatient Prospective Patient System (OPPS) CY 2012 Fee Schedule. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ HospitalOutpatientPPS/index.html?redirect=/hospitaloutpatientpps. Accessed August 1, 2012.
16. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule CY 2012. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for- Service-Payment/PhysicianFeeSched/index.html?redirect=/physicianfeesched/. Accessed August 1, 2012.
17. Medical Advisory Secretariat Scintimammography as an adjunctive breast imaging technology: an evidence-based analysis 2003 Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Toronto, Ontario, Canada
18. K.M. Kelly, and G.A. Richwald Automated whole-breast ultrasound: advancing the performance of breast cancer screening Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32 2011 273 280
19. E.A. Rafferty, J.M. Park, and L.E. Philpotts Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial Radiology 266 2013 104 113