Regulating chemical risk: REACH in a global governance perspective

Regulating Chemical Risks: European and Global Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 217-237

  Heyvaert, Veerle ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centralisation; Global governance; Privatisation; REACH; Risk regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889072200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. EUOBserver (2006) EU chemicals bill under fire from US-led coalition. http://www.euobserver.com.
2. Euractiv (2006) EU accepts trade ruling on GMOs. http://www.euractiv. com/en/trade/eu-acceptstrade-ruling-gmos/article-159918.
3. Euractiv (2008) US eyes REACH-style law for chemicals. Available via http://www.euractiv. com/en/environment/us-eyes-reach-style-law-chemicals/ article-172968.
4. ENDS Europe Daily (2007) Switzerland mulls adoption of REACH-lite, ENDS Europe Daily. http://www.endseuropedaily.com/articles/index.cfm.
5. ENDS Europe Daily, EU chemicals agency could go bust by 2011. http://www.endseuropedaily.com/articles/index.cfm.
6. Finkel, Adam (1994) A second opinion on an environmental misdiagnosis: the risky prescriptions of breaking the vicious circle. NYU Environmental Law Journal 3:341.
7. Fisher, Elizabeth (2008) The 'Perfect Storm' of REACH: charting regulatory controversy in the age of information, sustainable development and globalization. Journal of Risk Research 11:541.
8. Golub, Jonathan (2000) Globalization, sovereignty and policy-making. In: Holden, B (ed.) Global Democracy: Key Debates. Routledge, London.
9. Heyvaert, Veerle (1999a) The Regulation of Chemicals in the European Union. Dissertation, European University Institute.
10. Heyvaert, Veerle (1999b) Reconceptualizing risk assessment. RECIEL 8:138-141.
11. Heyvaert, Veerle (2001) Balancing trade and environment in the European Union: proportionality substituted? Journal of Environmental Law 13:395-398.
12. Heyvaert, Veerle (2006) Guidance without constraint: assessing the impact of the precautionary principle on the European Community's chemicals policy. In: Etty, T (ed) Yearbook of European Environmental Law, vol 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Heyvaert, Veerle (2008) The EU's chemicals policy: towards inclusive governance? In: Vos, Ellen (ed.) European Risk Governance: Its Science, its Inclusiveness and its Effectiveness, Connex, Mannheim.
14. Heyvaert, Veerle (2009) Globalising regulation: reaching beyond the borders of chemicals safety. Journal of Law and Society 36.
15. Hogue, Cheryl (2007) The future of U. S. chemical regulation. Chemical & Engineering News. Available via http://www.iisd.ca/process/chemical- management.htm.
16. Kjaer, Poul (2007) Rationality within REACH? On functional differentiation as the structural foundation of legitimacy in European chemicals regulation. EUI Law Working Papers, EUI, Florence. Available via http://cadmus.iue.it/dspace/handle/1814/6948.
17. Koch, Lars and Ashford, Nicholas (2006) Rethinking the role of information in chemicals policy: implications for TSCA and REACH. Journal of Cleaner Production 14:32.
18. Lazer, David (2006) Global and domestic goverance: models of interdependence in regulatory policymaking, European Law Journal 12:455-466.
19. Majone, Giandomenico (1995) Mutual trust, credible commitments and the evolution of the rules of the single market. EUI Working Paper RSC 95/1, EUI, Florence.
20. Majone, Giandomenico (2008) Unity in diversity: European integration and the enlargement process. European Law Review 457:469.
21. Meunier, Sophie and Jacoby, Wade (2007) Europe and the management of globalization: defensive and offensive responses to globalization pressures. Paper presented at the conference on Europe and the management of globalization, Princeton University, 23 February 2007. Available via http://www.princeton. edu/~smeunier/conference-europeanization. htm).
22. Molyneux, Garcia Candido (2005) Current survey on chemicals. In: Etty, T (ed) Yearbook of European Environmental Law, vol 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23. Moravscik, Andrew (1994) Why the European Community strengthens the state: domestic politics and international institutions. Centre for European Studies Working Paper Series 52. Centre for European Studies, Cambridge.
24. Q&A on the New Chemicals Policy, REACH, MEMO/06/488, 13 Dec. 2006. Available via http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction. do?reference=MEMO/06/ 488.
25. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (2007) REACH - a new chemicals regulation for the EU and EEA countries. Available via http://www.sft.no/ publikasjoner/2326/ta2326.pdf.
26. Pesendorfer, Dieter (2006) EU environmental policy under pressure: chemicals policy change between antagonistic goals? Environmental Politics 15:95.
27. De Sadeleer (2003) Procedures for derogations from the principle of approximation of laws under article 95 EC. Common Market Law Review 40:889.
28. Selin, Henrik (2007) Coalition politics and chemicals management in a regulatory ambitious Europe. Global Environmental Politics 7:63.
29. Stewart, Richard (1981) Regulation, innovation and administrative law: a conceptual framework. California Law Review 1259.
30. Tovias, Alfred (2006) Exploring the 'Pros' and 'Cons' of Swiss and Norwegian models of relations with the European Union: what can Israel learn from the experience of these two countries? Cooperation and Conflict 41:202.
31. Trachtman, Joel P. (2006) The world trading system, the international legal system, and multilevel choice. European Law Journal 12:479.
32. Van Calster, Geert (2006) Regulating nanotechnology in the European Union. European Environmental Law Review 15:242.
33. Vogel, David (1997) Trading up and governing across: transnational governance and environmental protection. Journal of European Public Policy 4:556.
34. Vogel, David (2003) Regulation in Europe and the US. In: Somsen, H (ed) Yearbook of European Environmental Law, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford.