COCHISE project: An augmented service dog for disabled people

Assistive Technology Research Series

Volumn 33, Issue , 2013, Pages 109-114

  Rybarczyk, Yves ^a,b   Vernay, Didier ^b   Rybarczyk, Pierre ^b   Lebret, Marie Claude ^c   Duhaut, Dominique ^d   Lemasson, Germain ^d   Pestye, Sylvie ^e   Lucidarme, Philippe ^f  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^b Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Service   (France)

^c National Association for the Education of Service Dogs for Disabled People   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

^e UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

Author keywords

Assistive robotics; Dog robot interaction; Human robot interaction; Motor disabilities; Service dog

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889054686     PISSN: 1383813X     EISSN: 18798071     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-304-9-109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. M. Asadpour, et al., Robot-Animal interaction: Perception and behavior of Insbot, Int. Journal of Advanced Robotics Systems, 3 (2006), 93-98
2. G. Sempo, et al., Complex dynamics based on a quorum: Decision-making process by cockroaches in a patchy environment, Ethology, 115 (2009), 1150-1161
3. http://mobots.epfl.ch/animal-robot-interaction.html
4. H. Hautop Lund, Robot-Animal interaction. Artificial Neural Networks Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1327 (1997), 745-750
5. http://www.ethos.univ-rennes1.fr/version-fr/Themes/Equipe1/Axe+3
6. S.K. Talwar, et al., Behavioural neuroscience: Rat navigation guided by remote control. Nature, 417 (2002), 37-38
7. http://www.parorobots.com
8. http://www.lirec.org
9. H. Nguyen, and C.C. Kemp, Bio-inspired assistive robotics: Service dogs as a model for human-robot interaction and mobile manipulation, IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (2008), 542-549
10. Y. Rybarczyk, and D. Mestre, Effect of temporal organization of the visuo-locomotor coupling on the predictive steering, Front. Psychology 3: 239 (2012), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00239
11. Y. Rybarczyk, and D. Mestre, Effect of visuo-manual configuration on a telerobot integration into the body schema, Le Travail Humain, 76 (2013), to appear
12. A.A. Pepe, et al., Go, dog, go: Maze training AIBO vs. a live dog, an exploratory study, Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 21 (2008), 71-83
13. F.N. Ribi, et al., Comparison of children-s behavior toward Sony-s robotic dog AIBO and a real dog: A pilot study. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 21 (2008), 245-256
14. S.C. Kramer, et al., Comparison of the effect of human interaction, animal-Assisted therapy, and AIBO-Assisted therapy on long-Term care residents with dementia, Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 22 (2009), 43-57
15. G.F. Melson, et al., Children's behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30 (2009), 92-102
16. C.M. Stanton, et al., Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism, 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, ACM Press, New York, 2008
17. P.H. Kahn, et al., Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children, Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7 (2006), 405-436
18. A. Miklosi, and M. Gacsi, On the utilization of social animals as a model for social robotics. Front. in Psychology 3: 75 (2012), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00075.