The Global Politics of Water Grabbing

Third World Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1651-1675

  Franco, Jennifer ^a   Mehta, Lyla ^b,c   Veldwisch, Gert Jan ^d  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (United Kingdom)

^c Noragric   (Norway)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAND MANAGEMENT; NEOLIBERALISM; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RURAL AREA; SOCIAL EXCLUSION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84889009535     PISSN: 01436597     EISSN: 13602241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843852     Document Type: Article

References (150)

1. We are very grateful to Paola Velasco Herrejon and Beth Mudford for their fantastic help with research assistance and copyediting this paper. We thank the editors of this special issue, three anonymous reviewers and Rutgerd Boelens and Jeroen Vos for their useful comments. The usual disclaimers apply.
2. B White, SM Borras Jr, R Hall, I. Scoones & W Wolford, 'The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals', Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 2012, pp 619-647.
3. L Mehta, GJ Veldwisch & J Franco, 'Introduction to the Special Issue: water grabbing? Focus on the (re) appropriation of finite water resources', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 193-207.
4. P Woodhouse, 'New investment, old challenges: land deals and the water constraint in African agriculture', Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 2012, pp 777-794.
5. J Skinner & L Cotula, Are Land Deals Driving 'Water Grabs'? Briefing: The Global Land Rush, London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), 2011, at http://pubs.iied.org/17102IIED, accessed April 2012.
6. AY Hoekstra & MM Mekonnen, 'The water footprint of humanity', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 2012, pp 3232-3237.
7. World Bank, Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Results?, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010.
8. J Chu, 'A blue revolution for Africa? Large-scale irrigation projects and land and water "grabs"', in TA Allan, M Keulertz, S Sojamo, & J Warner (eds), Handbook of Land and Water Grabs in Africa: Foreign Direct Investment and Food and Water Security, London: Routledge, 2013, pp 207-220.
9. T Hertzog, A Adamczewski, F Molle, JC Poussin & JY Jamin, 'Ostrich-like strategies in sahelian sands? Land and water grabbing in the Office du Niger, Mali', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 304-321.
10. Woodhouse, 'New investment, old challenges'.
11. S Duvail, C Médard, O Hamerlynck & DW Nyingi, 'Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland: the case of the Tana Delta', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 322-343.
12. TO Williams, B Gyampoh, F Kizito & R Namara, 'Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 243-265.
13. M Islar, 'Privatised hydropower development in Turkey: a case of water grabbing?', Water Alternatives, 5 (2), 2012, pp 376-391.
14. M Sosa & M Zwarteveen, 'Exploring the politics of water grabbing: the case of large mining operations in the Peruvian Andes', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 360-375.
15. Mehta et al, 'Introduction to the Special Issue'.
16. World Bank, Rising Global Interest in Farmland.
17. Oxfam, Land and Power: The Growing Scandal Surrounding the New Wave of Investments in Land, Oxford: Oxfam-International, 2011.
18. S Borras Jr, J Franco, S Gomez, C Kay & M Spoor, 'Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean', Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 2012, pp 845-872.
19. MC Rulli, A Saviori & P D'Odorico, 'Global land and water grabbing', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 2013, pp 892-897.
20. Hertzog et al, 'Ostrich-like strategies in sahelian sands?'.
21. SM Borras Jr, D Fig & SM Suárez, 'The politics of agrofuels and mega-land and water deals: insights from the ProCana case, Mozambique', Review of African Political Economy, 38(128), 2011, pp 215-234.
22. S Borras Jr & JC Franco, 'From threat to opportunity? Problems with the idea of a "Code of Conduct" for land-grabbing', Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 13(2), 2010, pp 507-523.
23. Williams et al, 'Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana'.
24. A Bues & I Theesfeld, 'Water grabbing and the role of power: shifting water governance in the light of agricultural foreign direct investment', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 266-283.
25. A Houdret, 'The water connection: irrigation, water grabbing and politics in southern Morocco', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 284-303.
26. Duvail et al, 'Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
27. I Velez Torres, 'Water grabbing in the Cauca basin: the capitalist exploitation of water and dispossession of afro-descendant communities', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 421-449.
28. LA Wily, 'Enclosure revisited: putting the global land rush in historical perspective', in Allan et al, Handbook of Land and Water Grabs in Africa, pp 11-24.
29. S Wagle, S Warghade & M Sathe, 'Exploiting policy obscurity for legalising water grabbing in the era of economic reform: the case of Maharashtra, India', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 412-430.
30. D Bossio, T Erkossa, Y Dile, M McCartney, F Killiches & H Hoff, 'Water implications of foreign direct investment in Ethiopia's agricultural sector', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 223-242.
31. N Matthews, 'Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin-an analysis of the winners and losers of Thailand's hydropower development in Lao PDR', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 392-411.
32. Duvail et al, 'Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
33. Hertzog et al, 'Ostrich-like strategies in sahelian sands?'.
34. Williams et al, 'Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana'.
35. Islar, 'Privatised hydropower development in Turkey'.
36. Wagle et al, 'Exploiting policy obscurity for legalising water grabbing'.
37. Bues & Theesfeld, 'Water grabbing and the role of power'.
38. Bossio et al, 'Water implications of foreign direct investment'.
39. Duvail et al, 'Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
40. Matthews, 'Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin'.
41. Wagle et al, 'Exploiting policy obscurity for legalising water grabbing';
42. Velez Torres, 'Water grabbing in the Cauca basin'.
43. Sosa & A Zwarteveen, 'Exploring the politics of water grabbing'.
44. Hertzog et al, 'Ostrich-like strategies in sahelian sands?'.
45. Williams et al, 'Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana'.
46. Matthews, 'Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin'.
47. Woodhouse, 'New investment, old challenges'.
48. P Woodhouse & A-S Ganho, 'Is water the hidden agenda of agricultural land acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa?', paper presented at the 'International Conference on Global Land Grabbing', Institute of Development Studies and Future Agricultures Consortium, University of Sussex, 6-8 April 2011.
49. Skinner & Cotula, Are Land Deals Driving 'Water grabs'?.
50. Sosa & Zwarteveen, 'Exploring the politics of water grabbing'
51. Velez Torres, 'Water grabbing in the Cauca basin'.
52. Matthews, 'Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin'.
53. Wagle et al, 'Exploiting policy obscurity for legalising water grabbing'.
54. S Gasteyer, J Isaac, J Hillal & S Walsh, 'Water grabbing in colonial perspective: land and water in Israel/ Palestine', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 450-468.
55. Islar, 'Privatised hydropower development in Turkey'.
56. Duvail et al, 'Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
57. Matthews, 'Water grabbing in the Mekong Basin'.
58. Williams et al, "Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana'.
59. Duvail et al, 'Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
60. W Beekman & GJ Veldwisch, 'The evolution of the land struggle for smallholder irrigated rice production in Nante, Mozambique', Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Vol 50-52, pp 179-184, 2012.
61. Velez Torres, 'Water grabbing in the Cauca basin'.
62. Gasteyer et al, 'Water grabbing in colonial perspective'.
63. Houdret, "The water connection'.
64. Sosa & Zwarteveen, "Exploring the politics of water grabbing'.
65. SM Borras, JC Franco & C Wang, 'The challenge of global governance of land grabbing: changing international agricultural context and competing political views and strategies', Globalizations, 10(1), 2013, pp 161-179.
66. Mehta et al, "Introduction to the Special Issue'.
67. S Arduino, G Colombo, OM Ocampo & L Panzeri, 'Contamination of community potable water from land grabbing: a case study from rural Tanzania', Water Alternatives, 5(2), 2012, pp 344-359.
68. Sosa & Zwarteveen, "Exploring the politics of water grabbing'.
69. A legal pluralism lens helps to situate law as a complex and contested socio-political process that unfolds unevenly over time and space and generates variable and contingent results that are open to competing interpretations.
70. L Mehta et al Exploring Understandings of Institutions and Uncertainty: New Directions in Natural Resources Management, IDS Discussion Paper 372, Brighton: IDS, 1999, p 10.
71. SM Suárez, 'The human rights framework in contemporary agrarian struggles', Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(1), 2013, pp 239-290.
72. P Seufert, 'The FAO Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests', Globalizations, 10(1), 2013, pp 181-186.
73. SM Suarez, The Recently Adopted Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests: A Turning Point in the Governance of Natural Resources?,
74. Right to Food and Nutrition Watch 2012-Who Decides About Global Food and Nutrition?/Strategies to Regain Control/Bread for the World/FIAN International/Interchurch Organization for Development Cooperation (ICCO), Heidelberg, Germany: FIAN International, 2012, p 37.
75. No mention of water is made beyond a single reference to the governance of water and other 'associated natural resources', such as for instance fisheries, by national states on basis of their own 'different models and systems of governance'.
76. Committee on World Food Security (CFS)-Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 'Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security', Rome: FAO, 2012.
77. One of the authors was present when the proposal to include water was voted down by the governments as being 'too complicated'.
78. This leaves small-scale fishers vulnerable to other governance initiatives, which have the potential to facilitate 'ocean-grabbing'.
79. World Forum of Fisher Peoples & World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers, "Call for Governments to Stop Supporting the Global Partnership for Oceans (GPO) and Rights-based Fishing (RBF) Reforms', 2013, at http://masifundise.org.za/press-statement-by-the-world-forum-of-fisher-peoples-in-response-to-the-global-partnership-for-oceans/.
80. R Künnemann & SM Suárez, 'International human rights and governing land grabbing: a view from global civil society', Globalizations, 10(1), 2013, pp 123-139.
81. Borras Jr & Franco, "From threat to opportunity?'.
82. R Bustamante, C Crespo & A Walnycki, 'Seeing through the concept of water as a human right in Bolivia', in F Sultana & A Loftus (eds), The Right to Water: Politics, Governance and Social Struggles, London: Earthscan, 2011, pp 223-240.
83. L Mehta, Unpacking Rights and Wrongs: Do Human Rights make a Difference? The Case of Water Rights in India and South Africa, IDS Working Paper 260, Brighton: IDS, 2005.
84. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Report of the Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations related to Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation, A/HRC/15/ 31, Geneva: OHCHR, 2010.http://www.suez-environnement.com/water/challenges/promoting-access-water-sanitation/, accessed 1 May 2013.
85. We thank an anonymous reviewer for pointing this out.
86. J Sumberg, J Thompson & P Woodhouse, 'Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious', Agriculture and Human Values, 30(1), 2013, pp 71-83.
87. Seattle to Brussels Network, http://www.tni.org/briefing/beginners-guide-trade-0?context=70931, 2012, p 22.
88. www.gcint.org/what-we-do/water-peace/un-watercourses-convention, accessed 1 May 2013.
89. K Conca, Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
90. Allan et al, Handbook of Land and Water Grabs in Africa.
91. AK Chapagain & D Tickner, 'Water footprint: help or hindrance?', Water Alternatives, 5(3), 2012, pp 563-581.
92. AY Hoekstra, Water Footprint of Modern Consumer Society, London: Taylor and Francis, 2013, p 288.
93. ND Hepworth, JC Postigo, B Güemes Delgado & P Kjell, Drop by Drop: Understanding the Impacts of the UK's Water Footprint through a Case Study of Peruvian Asparagus, London: Progressio/CEPES/Water Witness International, 2010.
94. D Harvey, The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003; K Bakker, 'Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales', Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 2005, pp 542-565.
95. A Borras et al, "Land grabbing in Latin America'.
96. S Bernstein, The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
97. A Bakker, "Neoliberalizing nature?'.
98. A Nicol, L Mehta & J Allouche (eds), '"Some for all?" Politics and pathways in water and sanitation', IDS Bulletin, 43(2), 2012, pp 10-12.
99. L Mehta (ed), The Limits to Scarcity, London: Earthscan, 2010.
100. Beekman & Veldwisch, "The evolution of the land struggle for smallholder irrigated rice production in Nante, Mozambique'.
101. Boelens & Vos, 'The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade', Agricultural Water Management, 108, 2012, pp 16-26.
102. RM Friend, 'Fishing for influence: fisheries science and evidence in water resources development in the Mekong basin', Water Alternatives, 2(2), 2009, pp 167-182.
103. Duvail et al, "Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
104. M Finger & J Allouche, Water Privatisation: Transnational Corporations and the Re-regulation of the Global Water Industry, London: Taylor and Francis, 2002.
105. KJ Bakker, Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World's Urban Water Crisis, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010.
106. D Hall, E Lobina & R de la Motte, "Public resistance to privatisation in water and energy', Development in Practice, 15(3-4), 2005, pp 286-301.
107. A Tricarico & C Amicucci, "Background on financialisation of water', paper prepared by CRBM for the European meeting, 'For the Construction of the European Network for Public Water', Naples, 10-11 December 2012.
108. F Molle, 'Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insights from the water sector', Water Alternatives, 1(1), 2008, pp 131-156.
109. Global Water Partnership, Integrated Water Resources Management, TAC Background Papers No 4, Stockholm: Global Water Partnership, 2000.
110. AK Biswas, 'Integrated water resources management: a reassessment', Water International, 29(2), 2004, pp 248-256.
111. Conca, Governing Water.
112. Molle, "Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models'.
113. F Cleaver, 'Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development', Journal of International Development, 11(4), 1999, pp 597-612.
114. P Wester, DJ Merrey & M De Lange, 'Boundaries of consent: stakeholder representation in river basin management in Mexico and South Africa', World Development, 31(5), 2003, pp 797-812.
115. R Boelens, The Rules of the Game and the Game of the Rules: Normalization and Resistance in Andean Water Control, Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2008.
116. J Warner, P Wester & A Bolding, 'Going with the flow: river basins as the natural units for water management', Water Policy, 10(S2), 2008, pp 121-138.
117. JS Kemerink, LE Méndez, R Ahlers, P Wester & P van der Zaag, 'The question of inclusion and representation in rural South Africa: challenging the concept of water user associations as a vehicle for transformation', Water Policy, 15(2), 2013, pp 243-257.
118. Warner et al, "Going with the flow'.
119. William et al, "Water implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Ghana'.
120. Borras et al, "Land grabbing in Latin America'.
121. Duvail et al, "Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
122. B van Koppen, Dispossession at the Interface of Community-based Water Law and Permit Systems, Community-based Water Law and Water Resource Management Reform in Developing Countries, http://ideas.repec.org/b/ags/iwmibo/138046.html, 2007, p 46.
123. S Hodgson, Land and Water: The Rights Interface, Vol 84, Rome: FAO, 2004, p 92.
124. R Meinzen-Dick & L Nkonya, "Understanding legal pluralism in water rights: lessons from Africa and Asia', paper prepared for the African Water Laws Workshop, 'Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa', 2005.
125. B van Koppen, H Sally, M Aliber, B Cousins & B Tapela, Water Resources Management, Rural Redress and Agrarian Reform, Development Planning Division, Working Paper Series No 7, DBSA: Midrand.
126. This paper is one of a set of papers on the theme of water security that the Development Planning Division of the DBSA commissioned in 2009.
127. There is a list of these papers at the back of this document. Published by Development Planning Division Development Bank of Southern Africa, http://www.dbsa.org/Research/DPD%20Working%20papers%20documents/DPD%20No%207.pdf.
128. GJ Veldwisch, W Beekman & A Bolding, 'Smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture: three cases from rural Mozambique', Water Alternatives, 6(1), 2013, pp 125-141.
129. Meinzen-Dick & Nkonya, "Understanding legal pluralism in water rights'.
130. Hodgson, Land and Water.
131. van Koppen, Dispossession at the Interface of Community-based Water Law and Permit Systems, p 46.
132. P van der Zaag, D Juizo, A Vilanculos, A Bolding & NC Post Uiterweer, "Does the Limpopo River Basin have sufficient water for massive irrigation development in the plains of Mozambique?', Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 35(13), 2010, pp 832-837.
133. Borras et al, "Land grabbing in Latin America'.
134. Veldwisch et al, "Smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture'.
135. Duvail et al, "Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland'.
136. Arduino et al, "Contamination of community potable water'.
137. Sosa & Zwarteveen, "Exploring the politics of water grabbing'.
138. Van Koppen, Dispossession at the Interface of Community-based Water Law and Permit Systems.
139. ND Hepworth, 'Open for business or opening Pandora's box? A constructive critique of corporate engagement in water policy-an introduction', Water Alternatives, 5(3), 2012, pp 543-562.
140. P Newborne & N Mason, 'The private sector's contribution to water management: re-examining corporate purposes and company roles', Water Alternatives, 5(3), 2012, pp 603-618.
141. S Sojamo & EA Larson, 'Investigating food and agribusiness corporations as global water security, management and governance agents: the case of Nestlé, Bunge and Cargill', Water Alternatives, 5(3), 2012, pp 619-635.
142. Newborne & Mason, "The private sector's contribution to water management'.
143. The Stockholm Industry Water Award recognises companies within the business sector that have demonstrated their commitment to advancing the world's water situation by achieving impressive performance in their water usage.
144. http://www.siwi.org/prizes/stockholm-industry-water-award.
145. Sojamo & Larson, "Investigating food and agribusiness corporations'.
146. Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN), Land Grabs Data Set, 2012, at http://www.grain.org/arti-cle/entries/4479-grain-releases-data-set-with-over-400-global-land-grabs, accessed 23 August 2013.
147. Newborne & Mason, "The private sector's contribution to water management'.
148. Sojamo & Larson, "Investigating food and agribusiness corporations'.
149. Van Koppen, Dispossession at the Interface of Community-based Water Law and Permit Systems.
150. ME Margulis & T Porter, 'Governing the global land grab: multipolarity, ideas, and complexity in transnational governance', Globalizations, 10(1), 2013, p 68.