Experience in comparative process assessment with multi-process-models

Conference Proceedings of the EUROMICRO

Volumn 2, Issue , 1999, Pages 268-273

  Wang, Yingxu ^a   Dorling, Alec ^a   Wickberg, Hakan ^a   King, Graham ^b  

^a SWEREA IVF   (Sweden)

^b Systems Engineering Research Cent   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

capability levels; case study; empirical report; multi models; process assessment; Software engineering; transformability

Indexed keywords

CAPABILITY LEVELS; EMPIRICAL REPORT; MULTI-MODELS; PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; TRANSFORMABILITY;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84889003194     PISSN: 10896503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EURMIC.1999.794790     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Wang, Y. and King, G. (1999), Principles of Software Engineering Process, CRC Press, Florida, USA, ISBN 0-8493-2366-5.
2. Wang Y., King, G., Doling, A. and Wickberg, H. (1999), A Unified Framework of the Software Engineering Process System Standards and Models, Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Software Engineering Standards Symposium (ISESS'99), IEEE Computer Society Press, Brazil, May, pp.132-141.
3. Wang, Y., Court, I., Ross, M., Staples, G. and King, G. (1996), Towards a Software Process Reference Model, Proceedings of International Conference on Software Process Improvement (SPI'96), Brighton, UK, pp.145-166.
4. Wang, Y., Court, I., Ross, M., Staples, G., King, G. and Dorling, A.(1997), Quantitative Analysis of Compatibility and Correlation of the Current SPA Models, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards (ISESS'97), IEEE Computer society Press, USA, June, pp. 36-56.
5. Wang, Y., Court, I., Ross, M., Staples, G., King, G. and Dorling, A. (1997), Quantitative Evaluation of the SPICE, CMM, ISO9000 and BOOTSTRAP, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards (ISESS'97), IEEE Computer Society Press, USA, June, pp. 57-68.
6. Humphrey, W.S. and W.L. Sweet (1987), A Method for Assessing the Software Engineering Capability of Contractors, Technical Report CMU/SEI-87-TR-23, SEI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
7. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. and Weber, C.V. (1993), Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24.
8. Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Garcia, S., Chrissis, M.B. and Bush, M. (1993), Key Practices of the Capacity Maturity Model, Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-93-TR-25.
9. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 (1998), TR 15504-2, IT-Software Process Assessment-Part 2: A Reference Model for Process and Process Capability, pp.1-39.
10. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 (1998), TR 15504-5, IT-Software Process Assessment-Part 5: An Assessment Model and Indicator Guidance, pp.1-121.
11. Kuvaja, P., Simila, J., Kizanik, L., Bicego, A., Koch, G. and Saukkonen, S. (1994), Software Process Assessment and Improvement: The BOOTSTRAP Approach, Blackwell Business Publishers.
12. Haase, V., Messmarz, R., Koch, G., Kugler, H.J. and Decrinis, P., (1994), Bootstrap: Fine-Tuning Process assessment, IEEE Software, July, pp.25-35.
13. International Organisation for Standardisation (1994), Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing, ISO 9001, Revised Edition, ISO, Geneve.
14. International Organisation for Standardisation (1991), Quality Management and Quality System Elements (Part 3)-Guidelines for Development, Supply and Maintenance of Software, ISO 9000-3, ISO, Geneve.
15. ISO/IEC SPICE Project (1998), SPICE Phase 2 Trial Report, V.1.1, SPICE Project, ISO/IEC JTCI/SC7/WG10, July, pp.40-41.
16. Wang, Y. and Dorling, A. (1998), PULSE ICT Acquisition Process Assessment Method, EC SPRITE S2, Project No.97/501155, Technical Report D3.1, pp. 1-58.