Establishing a bridge from graph-based modeling languages to ontology languages ?

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 604, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Walter, Tobias ^a   Schwarz, Hannes ^a   Ren, Yuan ^b  

^a University of Koblenz   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRDS; GRAPHIC METHODS; ONTOLOGY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WEAVING;

GRAPH-BASED MODELING; MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE; SOFTWARE INDUSTRY; T-GRAPH; TRADITIONAL MODELS; WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 84888999561     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Mellor, S., Clark, A., Futagami, T.: Model-driven development. IEEE Software 20(5) (2003) 14-18.
2. Ebert, J., Riediger, V., Winter, A.: Graph Technology in Reverse Engineering, The TGraph Approach. In: 10th Workshop Software Reengineering (WSR 2008). (2008) 67-81.
3. Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax (2009).
4. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification, OMG Available Specification, Version 2.0. (2006) http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2. 0/PDF.
5. Object Management Group: Object Constraint Language, Version 2.2. (2010) http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2/PDF.
6. Bildhauer, D., Horn, T., Riediger, V., Schwarz, H., Strauss, S.: grUML - A UML based Modeling Language for TGraphs. Technical report, University of Koblenz-Landau (2010) To appear in Arbeitsberichte Informatik.
7. Ebert, J., Bildhauer, D.: Reverse Engineering Using Graph Queries. In: Graph Transformations and Model Driven Engineering. Springer (2010) . To appear.
8. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press New York, NY, USA (2007).
9. Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Grau, B.C.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Direct Semantics. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-direct-semantics (2009).
10. Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Rosati, R., Sattler, U.: Can OWL and logic programming live together happily ever after? In: Proc. ISWC-2006. (2006) 501-514.
11. Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Pellet: An OWL DL Reasoner. In: Proc. of the 2004 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL2004). CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2004).
12. Gǎsevíc, D.V., Djuríc, D.O., Deveďzíc, V.B.: Bridging MDA and OWL Ontologies. Journal of Web Engineering 4(2) (2005) 118-143.
13. Wang, H., Dong, J., Sun, J., Sun, J.: Reasoning support for Semantic Web ontology family languages using Alloy. Multiagent and Grid Systems 2(4) (2006) 455-471.
14. Dong, J.S., Lee, C.H., Lee, H.B., Li, Y.F., Wang, H.: A combined approach to checking web ontologies. In: Proc. of the 13th InternationalWorldWideWeb Conference. (2004) 714-722.
15. Wolter, K., Krebs, T., Bildhauer, D., Nick, M., Hotz, L.: Software Case Similarity Measure. Project Deliverable D4.2, ReDSeeDS Project (2007).