The Anansi position (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)

Anthropology Today

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 14-17

  Eriksen, Thomas Hylland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888995074     PISSN: 0268540X     EISSN: 14678322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8322.12072     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Beck, S. & C. Maida (eds). 2013. Toward engaged anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn.
2. Berreman, G. 1968. Is anthropology alive? Current Anthropology 9(5): 391-396.
3. Engebrigtsen, A. 2007. Exploring Gypsiness: Power, exchange and interdependence in a Transylvanian village. Oxford: Berghahn.
4. Engebrigtsen, A. 2012. Tiggerbander og kriminelle bakmenn eller fattige EU-borgere? ('Beggar gangs and criminal puppeteers or poor EU citizens?') NOVA notat report 2/2012.
5. Eriksen, T.H. 2006. Engaging anthropology: The case for a public presence. Oxford: Berg.
6. Eriksen, T.H. 2013. Norwegian anthropologists study minorities at home: Political and academic agendas. In Beck, S. & C. Maida (eds). Toward engaged anthropology. Oxford: Berghahn.
7. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
8. Habermas, J. 1971 [1968]. Knowledge and human interests (trans.) J. Shapiro Boston: Beacon Press.
9. Johnson, P. 2013. Letter to University of Tromsø, in support of the visual anthropology programme.
10. McGranahan, C. 2006. Introduction: Public anthropology. India Review 5: 255-67.
11. Skjervheim, H. 1957. Deltakar og tilskodar ('Participant and observer'). Mimeo. Oslo: Department of Sociology.
12. Turner, V. 1969. The ritual process. Chicago: Aldine.