Appropriate Delivery of Advice and Guidance on Method Adaptation

10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1675-1681

  Aydin, Mehmet N ^a   van Slooten, Kees ^a   Harmsen, Frank ^b   Stegwee, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b Cap Gemini Ernst Young   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

decision support; Information systems development; method adaptation

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

BOTTOM UP; DECISION SUPPORTS; DECISION-MAKING PROCESS; INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; IS DEVELOPMENT; LARGE-SCALES; METHOD ADAPTATION; SHAREDNESS; SUPPORT TOOL; TOPDOWN;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84888994335     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M. & Nielsen, P. A. (1999) Action research, Communications of the ACM, 42(1), p. 94-97.
2. th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, Finland.
3. Aydin, M. N., Harmsen, F., Slooten, K. van, Stegwee, R. (2003) On the Adaptation of Agile Information Systems Development Method, CTIT Working paper, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
4. Aydin, M. N. (2004) Evolving Decision Support Practices for Method Adaptation, To appear in Proceedings of IFIP WG 8.3, DSS 2004, Prato, Italia.
5. Baskerville, R., and Stage, J. (2001) Accommodating emergent work practices: Ethnographic choice of method fragments. In B. Fitzgerald, N. Russo & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), In realigning research and practice: The social and organizational perspectives (p. 11-27). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. DSDM Consortium. (2003). Dynamic systems development method. Retrieved November 3, 2003, from http://www.dsdm.org
7. Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N., and O'Kane, T. (2003) Software development method tailoring at Motorola. Communications of the ACM, 46(4), 65-70.
8. Harmsen, F., Brinkkemper, S., and Oei, H. (1994) Situational method engineering for information systems projects. In T. W. Olle & A. A. V. Stuart (Eds.), Methods and associated tools for the information systems life cycle (p. 169-194). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T. (1984) Automatic processing of fundamental Information: The ease of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39(11), 1372-1388.
10. Humphreys, P.C. (1998) Discourses underpinning decision support, in D. Berkeley, G. Widmeyer, P. Brezillon & V. Rajkovic (eds.), Context Sensitive Decision Support Systems, Chapman and Hall.
11. Klein, H., Meyers, M. (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-93.
12. Merrian-Webster. (2003) Retrieved November 3, 2003, from http://www.m-w.com
13. Offenbeek, M. A. G. van, Koopman, P. L. (1996) Scenarios for system development: Matching context and strategy. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(4), 250-265.
14. Ralyte, J., Deneckere, R. and Rolland, C. (2003) Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering. In Johan Eder, Michele Missikoff (Eds.): Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 15th International Conference, CAiSE 2003, Klagenfurt, Austria, June 16-18, 2003, Proceedings.
15. Rolland, C., Prakash, N. (1996) A proposal for context-specific method engineering. In S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen & R. J. Welke (Eds.), Method engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support (pp. 191-208). Atlanta: Chapman & Hall.
16. Slooten, K. van (1996) Situated method engineering, Information Resources Management Journal 9, 23-31.