Evidence-based medicine: Augmentation mammaplasty

Plastic Surgery Complete: The Clinical Masters of PRS- Breast Augmentation

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1684-1696

  Lista, Frank ^a   Ahmad, Jamil ^a  

^a Plastic Surgery Clinic   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; CERVICOPLASTY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; CERVICOPLASTY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS;

EID: 84888992442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80880     Document Type: Chapter

References (110)

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2012 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2012-Plastic-Surgery-Statistics/Cosmetic-Procedure-Trends-2012.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2013.
2. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: The high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:2005-2016.
3. Adams WP Jr, Mallucci P. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:597e-611e.
4. Tebbetts JB. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1396-1409; discussion 1410-1415.
5. Choudry U, Kim N. Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: A survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:1352-1359.
6. Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: Six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:30-36.
7. Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K. Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: A single-center review of 3,002 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:325-329.
8. Pfeiffer P, Jørgensen S, Kristiansen TB, Jørgensen A, Hölmich LR. Protective effect of topical antibiotics in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:629-634.
9. Khan UD. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: Comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:42-47.
10. Mirzabeigi MN, Mericli AF, Ortlip T, et al. Evaluating the role of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in primary and secondary breast augmentation: A retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;32:61-68.
11. Hardwicke JT, Bechar J, Skillman JM. Are systemic antibiotics indicated in aesthetic breast surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1395-1403.
12. Gylbert L, Asplund O, Berggren A, Jurell G, Ransjö U, Ostrup L. Preoperative antibiotics and capsular contracture in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:260-267; discussion 268.
13. LeRoy J, Given KS. Wound infection in breast augmentation: The role of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15:303-305.
14. Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK. Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:835-842.
15. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: Its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs. 2005;28:1062-1068.
16. Bartsich S, Ascherman JA, Whittier S, Yao CA, Rohde C. The breast: A clean-contaminated surgical site. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:802-806.
17. Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F, Overton J, Gravante G. Capsular contractures: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1808-1819.
18. Virden CP, Dobke MK, Stein P, Parsons CL, Frank DH. Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1992;16:173-179.
19. Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1605-1611.
20. Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D. Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:94-106.
21. Schreml S, Heine N, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L. Bacterial colonization is of major relevance for high-grade capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:126-130.
22. Rieger UM, Pierer G, Lüscher NJ, Trampuz A. Sonication of removed breast implants for improved detection of subclinical infection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:404-408.
23. Rieger UM, Mesina J, Kalbermatten DF, et al. Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants. Br J Surg. 2013;100:768-774.
24. Moyer HR, Ghazi B, Saunders N, Losken A. Contamination in smooth gel breast implant placement: Testing a funnel versus digital insertion technique in a cadaver model. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:194-199.
25. Wixtrom RN, Stutman RL, Burke RM, Mahoney AK, Codner MA. Risk of breast implant bacterial contamination from endogenous breast flora, prevention with nipple shields, and implications for biofilm formation. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:956-963.
26. Niechajev I. Mammary augmentation by cohesive silicone gel implants with anatomic shape: Technical considerations. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001;25:397-403.
27. Fanous N, Tawilé C, Brousseau VJ. Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg. 2008;16:14-17.
28. Teitelbaum S. The inframammary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:33-43, v.
29. Troilius C. Endoscopic transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2004;24:67-73.
30. Serra-Renom J, Garrido MF, Yoon T. Augmentation mammaplasty with anatomic soft, cohesive silicone implant using the transaxillary approach at a subfascial level with endoscopic assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:640-645.
31. Momeni A, Padron NT, Bannasch H, Borges J, Björn Stark G. Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: Safe and predictable procedure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:1076-1081.
32. Tebbetts JB. Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: Processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(Suppl):53S-80S.
33. Giordano PA, Rouif M, Laurent B, Mateu J. Endoscopic transaxillary breast augmentation: Clinical evaluation of a series of 306 patients over a 9-year period. Aesthet Surg J. 2007;27:47-54.
34. Pacella SJ, Codner MA. The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:49-61, vi.
35. Luan J, Mu D, Mu L. Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: Experience with 98 breasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1459-1463.
36. Kolker AR, Austen WG Jr, Slavin SA. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: Minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64:667-673.
37. Strock LL. Transaxillary endoscopic silicone gel breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:745-755.
38. Niechajev I. Improvements in transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:322-329.
39. Lang Stümpfle R, Figueras Pereira-Lima L, Alves Valiati A, da Silva Mazzini G. Transaxillary muscle-splitting breast augmentation: Experience with 160 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:343-348.
40. Huang GJ, Wichmann JL, Mills DC. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: A single surgeon's 20-year experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:781-801.
41. Hammond DC. The periareolar approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:45-48, vi.
42. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LR, Damasio RC, Auersvald A. Subfascial breast implant: A new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:904-908.
43. Góes JC, Landecker A. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: Seven years of experience with the subfascial plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:178-184.
44. Siclovan HR, Jomah JA. Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: A two-year review of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:426-431.
45. Tijerina VN, Saenz RA, Garcia-Guerrero J. Experience of 1000 cases on subfascial breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:16-22.
46. Hunstad JP, Webb LS. Subfascial breast augmentation: A comprehensive experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:365-373.
47. Sampaio Góes JC. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:23-28.
48. Davidson BA. Submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2003;23:293-299.
49. Chester DL, Hodgson E, Khanna A. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1781; author reply 1781.
50. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1255-1272.
51. Khan UD. Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: A new pocket in a different plane. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007; 31:553-558.
52. Momeni A, Padron NT, Föhn M, et al. Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29:558-564.
53. Wiener TC. Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:303-306.
54. Jacobson JM, Gatti ME, Schaffner AD, Hill LM, Spear SL. Effect of incision choice on outcomes in primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:456-462.
55. Stutman RL, Codner M, Mahoney A, Amei A. Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:1096-1104.
56. Okwueze MI, Spear ME, Zwyghuizen AM, et al. Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:73-83; discussion 84.
57. Mofid MM, Klatsky SA, Singh NK, Nahabedian MY. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: A comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1694-1698.
58. Araco A, Araco F, Sorge R, Gravante G. Sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex and areolar pain following aesthetic breast augmentation in a retrospective series of 1200 patients: Periareolar versus submammary incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:984-989.
59. Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2182-2190.
60. Schaub TA, Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ. Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: Saline versus silicone. A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2140-2149.
61. Strasser EJ. Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: One surgeon's observations. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:45-50.
62. Pereira LH, Sterodimas A. Transaxillary breast augmentation: A prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:752-759.
63. Brown T. Subfascial breast augmentation: Is there any advantage over the submammary plane? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:566-569.
64. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical devices: Silicone gel-filled breast implants. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/ucm063871.htm. Accessed March 31, 2013.
65. Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1224-1236.
66. El-Sheikh Y, Tutino R, Knight C, Farrokhyar F, Hynes N. Incidence of capsular contracture in silicone versus saline cosmetic augmentation mammoplasty: A meta-analysis. Can J Plast Surg. 2008;16:211-215.
67. Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA. Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: A multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2143-2149; discussion 2150.
68. Walker PS, Walls B, Murphy DK. Natrelle saline-filled breast implants: A prospective 10-year study. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:19-25.
69. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS; Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):8S-16S; discussion 17S.
70. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP; Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):40S-48S.
71. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: Core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:709-717.
72. Cunningham B. The Mentor Core Study on Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):19S-29S; discussion 30S-32S.
73. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:440-444.
74. Cunningham B. The Mentor Study on Contour Profile Gel Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Suppl 1):33S-39S.
75. Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA. Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants: Clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1381-1391.
76. Stevens WG, Harrington J, Alizadeh K, et al. Five-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Silimed® brand round and shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:973-981.
77. Seify H, Sullivan K, Hester TR. Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:231-235; discussion 235.
78. Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:768-779; discussion 780.
79. Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1453-1457.
80. Hedén P, Boné B, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: Safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1281-1287.
81. Niechajev I, Jurell G, Lohjelm L. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:697-710.
82. Stevens WG, Pacella SJ, Gear AJ, et al. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: A review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28:642-647.
83. Hedén P, Bronz G, Elberg JJ, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:430-436; discussion 437.
84. Stevens WG, Hirsch EM, Tenenbaum MJ, Acevedo M. A prospective study of 708 form-stable silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:693-701.
85. Jewell ML, Jewell JL. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:51-65.
86. Dancey A, Nassimizadeh A, Levick P. Capsular contracture: What are the risk factors? A 14 year series of 1400 consecutive augmentations. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:213-218.
87. Codner MA, Mejia JD, Locke MB, et al. A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1300-1310.
88. Khan UD. Muscle-splitting, subglandular, and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplasties: A 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:290-302.
89. Lista F, Tutino R, Khan A, Ahmad J. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: A review of 440 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:295-303.
90. Cairns TS, de Villiers W. Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: A comparison between gel- and saline-filled prostheses. S Afr Med J. 1980;57:951-953.
91. Hetter GP. Satisfactions and dissatisfactions of patients with augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:151-155.
92. McKinney P, Tresley G. Long-term comparison of patients with gel and saline mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72:27-31.
93. Kjøller K, Hölmich LR, Jacobsen PH, et al. Capsular contracture after cosmetic breast implant surgery in Denmark. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;47:359-366.
94. Rohrich RJ, Reece EM. Breast augmentation today: Saline versus silicone-What are the facts? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:669-672.
95. Hall-Findlay EJ. Breast implant complication review: Double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:56-66.
96. Bengston B, Brody GS, Brown MH, et al. Managing late periprosthetic fluid collections (seroma) in patients with breast implants: A consensus panel recommendation and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1-7.
97. Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Glicksman C, Brown M, Al-Attar A. Late seromas after breast implants: Theory and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:423-435.
98. Bronz G. A comparison of naturally shaped and round implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22:238-246.
99. Friedman T, Davidovitch N, Scheflan M. Comparative double blind clinical study on round versus shaped cohesive gel implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:530-536.
100. Baeke JL. Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2555-2564; discussion 2568.
101. Schots JM, Fechner MR, Hoogbergen MM, van Tits HW. Malrotation of the McGhan Style 510 prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:261-265.
102. Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Corrias F, Scuderi N. A clinical study of late seroma in breast implantation surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:97-104.
103. Pinchuk V, Tymofii O. Seroma as a late complication after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:303-314.
104. Jewell M, Spear SL, Largent J, Oefelein MG, Adams WP Jr. Anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma and breast implants: A review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:651-661.
105. Kim B, Roth C, Chung KC, et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2141-2150.
106. Kim B, Roth C, Young VL, et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: Results from a structured expert consultation process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:629-639.
107. Taylor KO, Webster HR, Prince HM. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: Five Australian cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:610e-617e.
108. Eaves FF, Haeck PC, Rohrich RJ. Breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL): Using science to guide our patients and plastic surgeons worldwide. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2501-2503.
109. Tebbetts JB. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part I. Refining practices by using motion and time study principles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:273-290; discussion 291-292.
110. Tebbetts JB. Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:293-305; discussion 306-307.