Willingness to pay for residential electricity supply quality and reliability

Applied Energy

Volumn 115, Issue , 2014, Pages 280-292

  Hensher, David A ^a   Shore, Nina ^b   Train, Kenneth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NERA ECONOMIC CONSULTING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice analysis; Reliability; Residential electricity; Service quality; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; ELECTRICITY; HOUSING; POWER QUALITY; QUALITY OF SERVICE; RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SALES;

CANBERRA , AUSTRALIA; CHOICE ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY SERVICE; RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY; SERVICE QUALITY; STATED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

OUTAGES;

ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY MARKET; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AUSTRALIA; AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY; CANBERRA;

COLAPTES;

EID: 84888987860     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Louviere J., Hensher D., Swait J. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York.
2. The Market and Operational Research Institute (MORI). Experience of the Competitive Market; 2003.
3. Goett A., Hudson K., Train K. Customers' choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes. Energy J 2000, 21(4):1-28.
4. Carlsson F., Martinsson P. Does it matter when a power outage occurs? A choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to avoid power outages. Energy Econom 2008, 30:1232-1245.
5. Abdullah S., Mariel P. Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve electricity services. Energy Policy 2010, 38:4570-4581.
6. Beenstock M., Goldin G., Haitovsky Y. The cost of power outages in the business and public sectors in Israel: revealed preference vs. subjective valuation. Energy J 1997, [April 39+].
7. Primen. The cost of power disturbances to industrial and digital economy companies, submitted to EPRI's Consortium for Electric Infrastructure for a Digital Society (CEIDS); 2001.
8. SAIIR. Service standards for 2005 to 2010. Discussion paper, February; 2002.
9. SAIIR. Developing service incentives for the 2005 electricity distribution price review. Discussion paper, July; 2002.
10. United Energy. Submission to the office of the regulator-general. 20 April 2000.
11. Mansouri I., Newborough M., Probert D. Energy consumption in UK households: impact of domestic electrical appliances. Appl Energy 1996, 54(3):211-285.
12. Wang Z., Zhang B., Zhang Y. Determinants of public acceptance of tiered electricity price reform in China: evidence from four urban cities. Appl Energy 2012, 91(1):235-244.
13. Wacker G., Billinton R. Customer cost of electric service interruptions. Proc IEEE 1989, 77(6):919-930.
14. Hensher D.A., Shore N., Train K.N. Household's willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environ Resour Econom 2005, 32:509-531.
15. Hensher D.A., Shore N., Train K. Water supply security and willingness to pay to avoid drought restrictions. Econom Record 2006, 82(256):56-66.
16. Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Hensher D.A., Rose J., Greene W.H. Applied choice analysis: a primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.